Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
vim_dev
Home
+ new post
About this group
Join this group
Message from discussion move to next error
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Charles Campbell  
View profile  
 More options Aug 3 2011, 4:39 pm
From: Charles Campbell <Charles.E.Campb...@nasa.gov>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 16:39:20 -0400
Local: Wed, Aug 3 2011 4:39 pm
Subject: Re: [patch] move to next error
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Hi Bram!

> On Di, 02 Aug 2011, Bram Moolenaar wrote:

>> Christian Brabandt wrote:

>>> this patch fixes this issue from the todo list:

>>> ,----
>>> | 8   Add a command to jump to the next character highlighted with
>>> | "Error".
>>> `----

>>> It implements the [e and ]e movement commands, which move to the
>>> previous or next error. And while I was at it, I also made [t ]t move to
>>> the previous/next item that is highlighted with TODO highlighting.

>> Thanks, I'll put it on the todo list.

>> We are running out of command characters, taking two more from the ] and
>> [ list makes me wonder how many users will use them.  Perhaps we should
>> have one "move to highlight" command with an argument to specify what
>> kind of highlighting?  That would be more future safe.

> Like what? Something like ]h plus a char, that identifies the
> highlighting?

What about  [h and ]h, which would move to the next/previous instance of
the highlighting group specified in a new vim option; as a suggestion,
jumphlgroup .  This would be instead of [t and ]t, and could be used
instead of [e and]e, too, I suppose.

Regards,
Chip Campbell


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google