Message from discussion fix test29, [patch] improve line join algorithm was: Re: Planning Vim 7.3
Received: by 10.223.60.83 with SMTP id o19mr765662fah.42.1274126922306;
Mon, 17 May 2010 13:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.213.70.78 with SMTP id c14ls859506ebj.2.p; Mon, 17 May 2010
13:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.213.55.4 with SMTP id s4mr751313ebg.15.1274126918034;
Mon, 17 May 2010 13:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.213.55.4 with SMTP id s4mr751312ebg.15.1274126917974;
Mon, 17 May 2010 13:08:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from viefep18-int.chello.at (viefep18-int.chello.at [220.127.116.11])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 12si349259ewy.10.2010.05.17.13.08.37;
Mon, 17 May 2010 13:08:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 18.104.22.168 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of b...@moolenaar.net) client-ip=22.214.171.124;
Received: from edge02.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.237])
(InterMail vM.8.01.02.02 201-2260-120-106-20100312) with ESMTP
Mon, 17 May 2010 22:08:36 +0200
Received: from moolenaar.net ([126.96.36.199])
by edge02.upcmail.net with edge
id Jk8Y1e07G3AZFUG02k8cYj; Mon, 17 May 2010 22:08:36 +0200
Received: from masaka.moolenaar.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by moolenaar.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9ubuntu1) with ESMTP id o4HK90Sf007833;
Mon, 17 May 2010 22:09:00 +0200
To: Milan Vancura <mi...@ucw.cz>
Delivery-Date: Sun May 16 23:56:17 2010
Subject: [Patch] fix test29, [patch] improve line join algorithm was: Re:
Planning Vim 7.3
From: Bram Moolenaar <B...@Moolenaar.net>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 22:08:59 +0200
X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=kR1739jI04gsLPPBAx/k25XPeS1fzQof9TaPDYrpM2k= c=1 sm=0 a=Y3F-zHNTox8A:10 a=yQWWgrYGNuUA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=TrCfgy7aAAAA:8 a=UEyZKOYoAAAA:8 a=aNqopb9TAAAA:8 a=z5NtPgpyAAAA:8 a=GT6c83Ez5cn2zC_jWMcA:9 a=GRrHjpKCvFN8m2x4B2rwQB0hyjIA:4 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=G9Hz8oCEjZkA:10 a=XfVSpU5EmJAZevgs:21 a=JdQ2qVwsp-2fl1ON:21 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com:
188.8.131.52 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain
of b...@moolenaar.net) smtp.mail=b...@moolenaar.net
Mailing-list: list email@example.com; contact firstname.lastname@example.org
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:email@example.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Milan Vancura wrote:
> > I will try to include a few patches that have been pending for a while.
> > I don't have much time available, thus I will only include things that
> > take a few hours of my time. That basically means patches that are
> > ready to be included.
> Hi Bram,
> I resend my fixes of test29 and also a patch replacing O(n2) algorithm
> of line join by O(n) one. There are no significant changes in those
> patches since I published them on this list in past, they are just
> updated to current vim73 sources from mercurial.
> A fix of test29 is straigthforward, it is clear that (and how) it was
> A line join algorithm replacement may be considered as a feature but
> it was tested for a long time by all users of git branch vim-extended
> with no negative report for all that time.
> May you include them in vim 7.3, please?
I'll update the todo list for these patches.
I have a long list of patches that could be included, I'll have to stop
some time, otherwise 7.3 never gets done.
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
59. Your wife says communication is important in a marriage...so you buy
another computer and install a second phone line so the two of you can
/// Bram Moolenaar -- B...@Moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php