It has been a long time since the last release: Vim 7.2 was released in August 2008. There have been many patches, but not everybody will use them. It's about time for 7.3!
I will try to include a few patches that have been pending for a while. I don't have much time available, thus I will only include things that take a few hours of my time. That basically means patches that are ready to be included.
One thing that I will certainly do is improve the MS-Windows installer. I recently installed Vim on a new laptop and it didn't work very well. More and more people are using Windows 7. I think that taking Window XP as the minimal platform will work well. I hope we can make installing Vim on MS-Windows as simple and reliable as possible.
I also plan to drop the split in "lang" and "extra" archives. The burden to have several feature sets is no longer justified by the slightly smaller distribution. Putting everything together makes things a lot simpler.
Mercurial is going to be the primary method for distribution. I'll drop CVS, it slows me down too much. Someone else might be able to mirror the Mercurial repository in CVS, like it's done for Subversion.
I hope to bring out a first beta version by the end of May. That gives everybody time to send me updated and polished patches and runtime files. I need to have these halfway May, I also need some time to integrate everything.
It would also be nice if we can update the spell files. Volunteers wanted! See $VIMRUNTIME/spell/README.txt, the "MAINTAINING A LANGUAGE" section.
-- SOLDIER: What? A swallow carrying a coconut? ARTHUR: It could grip it by the husk ... "Monty Python and the Holy Grail" PYTHON (MONTY) PICTURES LTD
> It would also be nice if we can update the spell files. Volunteers > wanted! See $VIMRUNTIME/spell/README.txt, the "MAINTAINING A LANGUAGE" > section.
IIUC, Mozilla uses the same spellfile format as Vim? If that's the case, and if the Mozilla license (which, BTW, is undergoing revision, see among others http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2010/03/10/updating-the-mozilla-public... ), or whatever other license some of these dictionaries may be using, is found to be compatible with the Vim license, then maybe we could "just" borrow the desired files from the dictionaries at https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/browse/type:3 ? (Note: an .xpi is just a .zip under another name.)
Best regards, Tony. -- Heavy, adj.: Seduced by the chocolate side of the force.
Tony Mechelynck wrote: > On 11/04/10 16:33, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > [...]
>> It would also be nice if we can update the spell files. Volunteers >> wanted! See $VIMRUNTIME/spell/README.txt, the "MAINTAINING A LANGUAGE" >> section.
> IIUC, Mozilla uses the same spellfile format as Vim? If that's the case, and > if the Mozilla license (which, BTW, is undergoing revision, see among others > http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2010/03/10/updating-the-mozilla-public... > ), or whatever other license some of these dictionaries may be using, is > found to be compatible with the Vim license, then maybe we could "just" > borrow the desired files from the dictionaries at > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/browse/type:3 ? (Note: an .xpi > is just a .zip under another name.)
":help spell-mkspell" says:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- - You can create a Vim spell file from the .aff and .dic files that Myspell uses. Myspell is used by OpenOffice.org and Mozilla. You should be able to find them here: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Dictionaries --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -
The link in help file contains dictionaries for the old OpenOffice-2.x.
OpenOffice-3.x has changed the format of the dictionaries OpenOffice-3.x dictionaries are available at:
Does anybody knows whether it's possible to convert the OpenOffice-3.x dictionaries to Vim dictionaries?
OpenOffice-3.x has more dictionaries than OpenOffice-2.x. For example, I'm interested in converting the Breton dictionary to Vim, but it's only available for OpenOffice-3.x and not OpenOffice-2.x.
> It has been a long time since the last release: Vim 7.2 was released in > August 2008. There have been many patches, but not everybody will use > them. It's about time for 7.3!
> I will try to include a few patches that have been pending for a while. > I don't have much time available, thus I will only include things that > take a few hours of my time. That basically means patches that are > ready to be included.
> One thing that I will certainly do is improve the MS-Windows installer. > I recently installed Vim on a new laptop and it didn't work very well. > More and more people are using Windows 7. I think that taking Window XP > as the minimal platform will work well. I hope we can make installing > Vim on MS-Windows as simple and reliable as possible.
> I also plan to drop the split in "lang" and "extra" archives. The > burden to have several feature sets is no longer justified by the > slightly smaller distribution. Putting everything together makes things > a lot simpler.
> Mercurial is going to be the primary method for distribution. I'll > drop CVS, it slows me down too much. Someone else might be able to > mirror the Mercurial repository in CVS, like it's done for Subversion.
> I hope to bring out a first beta version by the end of May. That gives > everybody time to send me updated and polished patches and runtime > files. I need to have these halfway May, I also need some time to > integrate everything.
> It would also be nice if we can update the spell files. Volunteers > wanted! See $VIMRUNTIME/spell/README.txt, the "MAINTAINING A LANGUAGE" > section.
Yes, but many of these patches are not mature. E.g., first one, "Improved regular expression engine", is still lacking the tests to verify that it doesn't break anything. That's a pity, because it can make syntax highlighting much faster.
I want to avoid that I include something that triggers a long sequence of bug fixes. "Works fine for me" is not always a good indication. 7.3 is going to be a stable release, thus I don't want to take too much risc. Part of my work will be to estimate the risc, which involves carefully looking through the code changes.
-- CART DRIVER: Bring out your dead! We follow the cart through a wretched, impoverished plague-ridden village. A few starved mongrels run about in the mud scavenging. In the open doorway of one house perhaps we jug glimpse a pair of legs dangling from the ceiling. In another doorway an OLD WOMAN is beating a cat against a wall rather like one does with a mat. The cart passes round a dead donkey or cow in the mud. And a MAN tied to a cart is being hammered to death by four NUNS with huge mallets. "Monty Python and the Holy Grail" PYTHON (MONTY) PICTURES LTD
> Yes, but many of these patches are not mature. E.g., first one, > "Improved regular expression engine", is still lacking the tests to > verify that it doesn't break anything. That's a pity, because it can > make syntax highlighting much faster.
> I want to avoid that I include something that triggers a long sequence > of bug fixes. "Works fine for me" is not always a good indication. > 7.3 is going to be a stable release, thus I don't want to take too much > risc. Part of my work will be to estimate the risc, which involves > carefully looking through the code changes.
It is true that they are in different stages of development. Here are my top five; not in preference order.
#14 (Vince Negri's conceal/ownsyntax/cursorbind) already has a long track record. I first heard about it when I first learned about Steve Hall's Vim for Windows, that must have been in Vim 6.2 or 6.3 time, and it was not new even then. Has documentation. Maybe too controversial (not enough "mainline"-like) to be included by default? OTOH it has been victim of bit-rotting in the past (i.e. conflict with "mainline" patches) and of course bringing it in would eliminate that problem forever. A compile-time option maybe (or two, or three)? You're the boss.
#13 (Access W32 clipboard from Cygwin "Unix" Vim) is interesting but still in beta. IIUC ifdeffed by whatever FEAT_* corresponds to has('win32unix'). Bring 'em in or let it bake some more?
#10 (Variable tabstops) sounds interesting. I haven't tested it. Reportedly still in alpha. Probably wait some more (Vim 8.0 ?) but keep an eye on it.
#9 (Relative line numbers) sounds interesting. I haven't tested it. Its authors say "it works". I don't feel competent to evaluate it by eyeballing the code.
#7 (Bill McCarthy's additional float functions). This one I've taken up in my "Huge" Vim. Not a single problem AFAICT. Code examination shows that it is done cleanly and simply, within #ifdef FEAT_FLOAT, and does not interfere with other stuff outside the "call function -> return value" codepath. IMHO this one is the most worthy of including into mainline Vim (and perhaps the least risky). Maybe a one-time check in a build with FEAT_EVAL on and FEAT_FLOAT off to make sure no #ifdef was forgotten. (I already compile a Tiny build without +eval in addition to my Huge build, from the same source, and no problems there either.) Documentation exists and is well-written, as a separate helpfile to avoid problems with rsync; probably merge that into eval.txt.
> (also note I'm using "Fossil" for source control...)
> I've started doing a Hebrew menu.vim (and I'll do a he.po as well). > But the > RTL stuff really doesn't work so well when the UI is LTR ...
There are already two possibilities for the main display: - Let Vim handle RTL or LTR at the window level (:set invrightleft) or - Run Vim in console mode in a full-bidi terminal (such as mlterm), leave 'rightleft' off, and let the terminal handle characterwise bidi.
It is possible to use menus in console mode (with 'wildmenu', :emenu, and, in the vimrc, :runtime! menu.vim); I suppose in that case mlterm will apply true-bidi but console Vim in other terminals (or gvim with :emenu) won't. Not sure how to display RTL menus at the top of the GUI (and in which GUI flavour...).
Best regards, Tony. -- He hadn't a single redeeming vice. -- Oscar Wilde
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 04:33:31PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Hello Vim users!
> [...]
> Mercurial is going to be the primary method for distribution. I'll > drop CVS, it slows me down too much. Someone else might be able to > mirror the Mercurial repository in CVS, like it's done for Subversion.
I don't think we have any reason to keep the CVS repository any longer. It's way too slow and rather user-unfriendly. Nobody will want to use CVS if he could have any other alternatives.
I think the Subversion repository should also be abandoned. I tried Mercurial, it's rather powerful and very easy to use. I suggest that we just stick with Mercurial and only use this as official repository. If any other people wish to use other forms of repositories, they can publish their unofficial mirrors, just as vim-cocoa does.
> I hope to bring out a first beta version by the end of May. That gives > everybody time to send me updated and polished patches and runtime > files. I need to have these halfway May, I also need some time to > integrate everything.
What's the feature-freeze date? I want to submit a small feature and a tiny feature. Hope I could have enough time for that.
> It would also be nice if we can update the spell files. Volunteers > wanted! See $VIMRUNTIME/spell/README.txt, the "MAINTAINING A LANGUAGE" > section.
> -- > SOLDIER: What? A swallow carrying a coconut? > ARTHUR: It could grip it by the husk ... > "Monty Python and the Holy Grail" PYTHON (MONTY) PICTURES LTD
> -- > You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. > Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. > For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
> To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
Hi Tony! (replying to vim_use and vim_dev. Should we keep the discussion on vim_dev or rather on vim_use?)
Disclaimer: I know, this is not a wishlist thread, but I could not resist ;)
On Mo, 12 Apr 2010, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> It is true that they are in different stages of development. Here are > my top five; not in preference order.
> #14 (Vince Negri's conceal/ownsyntax/cursorbind) already has a long > track record. I first heard about it when I first learned about Steve > Hall's Vim for Windows, that must have been in Vim 6.2 or 6.3 time, and > it was not new even then. Has documentation. Maybe too controversial > (not enough "mainline"-like) to be included by default? OTOH it has been > victim of bit-rotting in the past (i.e. conflict with "mainline" > patches) and of course bringing it in would eliminate that problem > forever. A compile-time option maybe (or two, or three)? You're the boss.
I'd like that too.
> #13 (Access W32 clipboard from Cygwin "Unix" Vim) is interesting but > still in beta. IIUC ifdeffed by whatever FEAT_* corresponds to > has('win32unix'). Bring 'em in or let it bake some more?
I have no opinion on that.
> #10 (Variable tabstops) sounds interesting. I haven't tested it. > Reportedly still in alpha. Probably wait some more (Vim 8.0 ?) but keep > an eye on it.
I'd like that one.
> #9 (Relative line numbers) sounds interesting. I haven't tested it. Its > authors say "it works". I don't feel competent to evaluate it by > eyeballing the code.
I'd really like that one.
> #7 (Bill McCarthy's additional float functions). This one I've taken up > in my "Huge" Vim. Not a single problem AFAICT. Code examination shows > that it is done cleanly and simply, within #ifdef FEAT_FLOAT, and does > not interfere with other stuff outside the "call function -> return > value" codepath. IMHO this one is the most worthy of including into > mainline Vim (and perhaps the least risky). Maybe a one-time check in a > build with FEAT_EVAL on and FEAT_FLOAT off to make sure no #ifdef was > forgotten. (I already compile a Tiny build without +eval in addition to > my Huge build, from the same source, and no problems there either.) > Documentation exists and is well-written, as a separate helpfile to > avoid problems with rsync; probably merge that into eval.txt.
If you consider that, would you also consider including a random() function call?
Additionally I'd like persistent undo (#4), unified colors (#12) and correctly indent wrapped lines (#15) and maybe quickfix-title from the extended git repository as well as fast-join and really nice would be the margincolumn patch that was floating around vim_dev for some time.
On 12-Apr-2010 Tony Mechelynck <antoine.mechely...@gmail.com> wrote:
> #10 (Variable tabstops) sounds interesting. I haven't tested it. > Reportedly still in alpha. Probably wait some more (Vim 8.0 ?) but > keep an eye on it.
Pretty stable alpha, I'd say. It's of limited use for programming but I've been using it for configuration files and it's been totally reliable since the last update in Nov 2009.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Lech Lorens <lech.lor...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12-Apr-2010 Tony Mechelynck <antoine.mechely...@gmail.com> wrote: > > #10 (Variable tabstops) sounds interesting. I haven't tested it. > > Reportedly still in alpha. Probably wait some more (Vim 8.0 ?) but > > keep an eye on it.
> Pretty stable alpha, I'd say. It's of limited use for programming but > I've been using it for configuration files and it's been totally > reliable since the last update in Nov 2009.
> -- > Cheers, > Lech
> -- > You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. > Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. > For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
> To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 04:03 PM PDT, Jordan Lewis wrote:
JL> Any thoughts about including persistent undo in Vim 7.3? It's being JL> maintained in Markus Heidelberg's vim_extended repository here JL> http://repo.or.cz/w/vim_extended.git/shortlog/refs/heads/feat/persist.... JL> It's also the 3rd most popular new feature on the new feature voting list.
I'd like to see the persistent undo patch included in v7.3 . But I would also like greater control than provided by 'undofile' (as mentioned in an old thread).
Along these same lines, if persistent undo is included it would be beneficial if the Undo Branches were tagged by Time *and* Date; rather than just Time.
Jordan Lewis wrote: > Any thoughts about including persistent undo in Vim 7.3? It's being > maintained in Markus Heidelberg's vim_extended repository here > http://repo.or.cz/w/vim_extended.git/shortlog/refs/heads/feat/persist.... > It's also the 3rd most popular new feature on the new feature voting list.
I do like the functionality of this patch, but this is something that requires a lot of testing. You don't want your text to be changed in unexpected ways (lines go missing or duplicated where you aren't looking).
What helps with this is someone writing a good test. One that also tries to find the border cases. In this specific case it's not so easy, since it involves restarting Vim to check that loading undo information from a file works as expected. But it doesn't involve writing C code, any advanced Vim user should be able to do this.
-- DENNIS: Look, strange women lying on their backs in ponds handing out swords ... that's no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. "Monty Python and the Holy Grail" PYTHON (MONTY) PICTURES LTD
>> Any thoughts about including persistent undo in Vim 7.3?
> I do like the functionality of this patch, but this is something that > requires a lot of testing. You don't want your text to be changed in > unexpected ways (lines go missing or duplicated where you aren't > looking).
I'm unfamiliar with the internal operation of this patch. Does it verify that the file in question, with persistent undo info, has not been modified since last open. For example with a crc?
> What helps with this is someone writing a good test. One that also > tries to find the border cases. In this specific case it's not so easy, > since it involves restarting Vim to check that loading undo information > from a file works as expected. But it doesn't involve writing C code, > any advanced Vim user should be able to do this.
Could you elaborate on that (maybe taking this to private mail, in case this is disturbing here)? I am willing to help out and write test cases.
regards, Christian -- Wer sich zum Alleinherrscer erhebt und Brutus nicht t tet, oder wer einen Freistaat gr ndet und die S hne des Brututs nicht hinrichten l t, wird sich nicht lange halten. -- Niccol Machiavelli (Vom Start)
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Ernie Rael <e...@raelity.com> wrote: > On 4/13/2010 5:49 AM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>> Jordan Lewis wrote:
>>> Any thoughts about including persistent undo in Vim 7.3?
>> I do like the functionality of this patch, but this is something that
>> requires a lot of testing. You don't want your text to be changed in >> unexpected ways (lines go missing or duplicated where you aren't >> looking).
> I'm unfamiliar with the internal operation of this patch. Does it verify > that the file in question, with persistent undo info, has not been modified > since last open. For example with a crc?
> -ernie
It does a basic check using file modification times, which is sufficient barring a pathological user who modifies a file's mtime to match the last time Vim wrote out the file, after modifying the file itself.
Christian Brabandt wrote: > On Di, 13 Apr 2010, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > What helps with this is someone writing a good test. One that also > > tries to find the border cases. In this specific case it's not so easy, > > since it involves restarting Vim to check that loading undo information > > from a file works as expected. But it doesn't involve writing C code, > > any advanced Vim user should be able to do this.
> Could you elaborate on that (maybe taking this to private mail, in case > this is disturbing here)? I am willing to help out and write test cases.
Basically: - look at the documentation - look at what the code does (fix documentation when needed) - test that what it's supposed to do actually works, possibly trying every documented feature - think of border cases (empty file, one very long line, missing line break, binary file, etc.) and test that all works - have a brainstorm about what could go wrong and test that (e.g., changing the file with another editor, renaming another file in its place)
Using some kind of script to make this less work. Could perhaps be a Vim script that writes a script file and runs another Vim with "!vim -S scriptfile filename". That way it's portable.
-- BLACK KNIGHT: The Black Knight always triumphs. Have at you! ARTHUR takes his last leg off. The BLACK KNIGHT's body lands upright. BLACK KNIGHT: All right, we'll call it a draw. "Monty Python and the Holy Grail" PYTHON (MONTY) PICTURES LTD
On 11-Apr-2010 Bram Moolenaar <B...@Moolenaar.net> wrote:
> I hope to bring out a first beta version by the end of May. That gives
> everybody time to send me updated and polished patches and runtime
> files. I need to have these halfway May, I also need some time to
> integrate everything.
I attached a patch enabling the quickfix window titles which I sent to
vim-dev about a year ago. This is against Vim 7.2.411.
-- Cheers,
Lech
-- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
> Yes, but many of these patches are not mature. E.g., first one,
> "Improved regular expression engine", is still lacking the tests to
> verify that it doesn't break anything. That's a pity, because it can
> make syntax highlighting much faster.
> I want to avoid that I include something that triggers a long sequence
> of bug fixes. "Works fine for me" is not always a good indication.
> 7.3 is going to be a stable release, thus I don't want to take too much
> risc. Part of my work will be to estimate the risc, which involves
> carefully looking through the code changes.
Unfortunately, this means that some features are very unlikely to make
it into Vim 7.3 (or any later version for that matter). If it's the bug
fixes that worry you, then I can't think of a solution. But if you
simply don't like the idea of providing the users with Vim that might be
unstable, then maybe you would accept one of the solutions:
- let Vim stay in 7.3-alpha stage for a longer while,
- release Vim 7.3 but then create a testing branch of Vim. The main
branch and the testing branch would get normal bug fixes, but the
testing branch would also be the place for developing new features.
Either way, I believe there are people who would be willing to accept
Vim of alpha quality for the price of getting interesting features in
(I for one would, perhaps the vim-dev subscribers as well).
By the way, if there is any task during preparing Vim 7.3 that you think
you could "outsource" ;-) I can commit myself to spending a day a week
on Vim for the next month or two.
-- Cheers,
Lech
-- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Lech Lorens wrote:
> On 11-Apr-2010 Bram Moolenaar <B...@Moolenaar.net> wrote:
> > I hope to bring out a first beta version by the end of May. That gives
> > everybody time to send me updated and polished patches and runtime
> > files. I need to have these halfway May, I also need some time to
> > integrate everything.
> I attached a patch enabling the quickfix window titles which I sent to
> vim-dev about a year ago. This is against Vim 7.2.411.
This is what's in the todo list about this:
6 In the quickfix window statusline add the command used to get the list of
errors, e.g. ":make foo", ":grep something *.c".
Patch by Lech Lorens, 2009 Mar 23.
Comments from Andreas Bernauer 24th, Dominique Pelle 24th
Docs patch by Dominique Pelle, Mar 25
Update 2009 Mar 28.
Fix for invalid memory access. (Lech Lorens, 2009 Apr 17)
Did others try it out the version of 2009 Apr 17?
-- Team-building exercises come in many forms but they all trace their roots back
to the prison system. In your typical team-building exercise the employees
are subjected to a variety of unpleasant situations until they become either a
cohesive team or a ring of car jackers.
(Scott Adams - The Dilbert principle)
-- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
> I will try to include a few patches that have been pending for a while.
> I don't have much time available, thus I will only include things that
> take a few hours of my time. That basically means patches that are
> ready to be included.
Hi,
a few months ago I posted an updated patch for the margincolumn
feature that actually allows you to highlight a specified column (i.e.
to show the current buffer's textwidth). Since then I kept updating it
and use it without any problems.
The patch for vim-7.2.411 is attached.
Cheers,
Gregor
-- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
> > I will try to include a few patches that have been pending for a while.
> > I don't have much time available, thus I will only include things that
> > take a few hours of my time. That basically means patches that are
> > ready to be included.
> Hi,
> a few months ago I posted an updated patch for the margincolumn
> feature that actually allows you to highlight a specified column (i.e.
> to show the current buffer's textwidth). Since then I kept updating it
> and use it without any problems.
> The patch for vim-7.2.411 is attached.
> Cheers,
> Gregor
I like the feature very much. However, I used the version of the patch
which called it 'guidecolumn'. I can remember an argument that
'guidecolumn' is not a good name because it would be confusing to get
the option when trying to complete ":help gui". But in the same manner
isn't it confusing that ":help win" completes both the functions for
window interaction and features related to the Windows OS?
I prefer 'guidecolumn' to 'margincolumn' and feel that the former name
better reflects what the option is about since other editors allegedly
call it guide lines. Try searching the web for images of "Visual Studio
margin line" (no hits in the first 40 results) vs "Visual Studio guide
line" (I got 6 hits among the first 8 images; don't feel like checking
the first 40 results).
-- Cheers,
Lech
-- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
> On 18-Apr-2010 Gregor Uhlenheuer <kongo2...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > a few months ago I posted an updated patch for the margincolumn
> > feature that actually allows you to highlight a specified column (i.e.
> > to show the current buffer's textwidth). Since then I kept updating it
> > and use it without any problems.
> > The patch for vim-7.2.411 is attached.
> > Cheers,
> > Gregor
> I like the feature very much. However, I used the version of the patch
> which called it 'guidecolumn'. I can remember an argument that
> 'guidecolumn' is not a good name because it would be confusing to get
> the option when trying to complete ":help gui". But in the same manner
> isn't it confusing that ":help win" completes both the functions for
> window interaction and features related to the Windows OS?
> I prefer 'guidecolumn' to 'margincolumn' and feel that the former name
> better reflects what the option is about since other editors allegedly
> call it guide lines. Try searching the web for images of "Visual Studio
> margin line" (no hits in the first 40 results) vs "Visual Studio guide
> line" (I got 6 hits among the first 8 images; don't feel like checking
> the first 40 results).
I attached an updated patch for 'margincolumn' with a tiny fix.
-- Cheers,
Lech
-- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
since I had to set up windows I updated the patch for the python3 support to vim trunk 7.2.411.
It is attached.
regards, Roland
-- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php