Received: by 10.180.94.105 with SMTP id db9mr573348wib.2.1334923301593;
        Fri, 20 Apr 2012 05:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: vim-perl@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.180.76.202 with SMTP id m10ls1020651wiw.1.canary; Fri, 20 Apr
 2012 05:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.137.196 with SMTP id y46mr397613wei.7.1334923301091;
        Fri, 20 Apr 2012 05:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.216.204 with SMTP id g54mswep;
        Fri, 20 Apr 2012 04:54:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.137.196 with SMTP id y46mr396054wei.7.1334922881262;
        Fri, 20 Apr 2012 04:54:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.137.196 with SMTP id y46mr396053wei.7.1334922881245;
        Fri, 20 Apr 2012 04:54:41 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <google01...@rainslide.net>
Received: from kitt.vm.bytemark.co.uk (kitt.vm.bytemark.co.uk. [89.16.173.113])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id w8si884822wiv.3.2012.04.20.04.54.41;
        Fri, 20 Apr 2012 04:54:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 89.16.173.113 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of google01...@rainslide.net) client-ip=89.16.173.113;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 89.16.173.113 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of google01...@rainslide.net) smtp.mail=google01...@rainslide.net
Received: by kitt.vm.bytemark.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 01E4764318; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:54:40 +0100 (BST)
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:54:40 +0100
From: Paul <google01...@rainslide.net>
To: vim-perl@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [vim-perl] Changes/Update to efm_perl.pl question(s).
Message-ID: <20120420115440.GA16454@rainslide.net>
Mail-Followup-To: vim-perl@googlegroups.com
References: <32106631.57.1334875258823.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcgs4>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <32106631.57.1334875258823.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcgs4>
Content-Language: en-GB

On Thursday, 19 April, 2012 at 23:40:58 BST, HarleyPig wrote:
>Also, if any of the following modules are installed; circular::require,
>indirect, warnings::method or warnings::unused, it is assumed you want to
>use them to check your code, and are included in the call to 'perl -c'.

I wouldn't assume that just because something's installed, it should always be used. That could get very annoying very quickly.

-- 

.