Mike 2.0 and VNA

[Mar...@cleaver.org]

Hi all,   

Has anyone here tried to put VNA into the context of Deloitte's MIKE 2.0 OPEN SOURCE STANDARD FOR INFORMATION MANAGEMENT http://mike2.openmethodology.org/ ?

VNA would seem a natural fit, but my search got no hits - either explicit or implied linkage points would be much appreciated. 

Thanks,

   Martin.

-- 
Martin Cleaver MSc MBA
Cell: 416-786-6752
Martin....@BlendedPerspectives.com
Principal, http://www.blendedperspectives.com/
Founder, http://www.torontowikituesdays.com/
Co-founder, http://meetup.knowledgeworkers.org
Industry chair, http://www.wikisym.org/

[Laurence Lock Lee]

I had a quick browse, but for me it isn't a natural fit. It looks like a typical top down information management framework with perhaps a slight acknowledgement of the networks near the bottom on the collaborative environments. Information is only one dimension of value. Top down compliance is different to the peer to peer accountability that VNA promotes.

Perhaps if they turn the model upside down it might become interesting.

Laurence Lock Lee PhD
Partner, Optimice Pty Ltd
Ph: +61 (0)407001628
www.optimice.com.au
Blog: http://governanceandnetworks.blogspot.com/
 
Learn to network, then network to learn

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Value Networks" group.
To post to this group, send email to value-n...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to value-network...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/value-networks?hl=en.

[Mar...@cleaver.org]

Ah, right, thanks Laurence.

So MIKE 2.0 strives at similar objectives - to manage the quantity and type of information - but it assumes that an authority can know the extent of the information that emerges and is capable of making central decisions about it?

Do you think that a governance model could distribute responsibility back to teams so they can collaboratively apply the MIKE 2.0 framework? Or would this still create gatekeeper issues that couldn't keep up with let along fairly represent an evolving ecosystem? 

Would MIKE 2.0 fit better for small scale organizations and VNA fit better for bigger ones?

Thanks,

   Martin.

--
Mar...@Cleaver.org
http://twitter.com/mrjcleaver
+1 416-786-6752 (GMT-5)

[Laurence Lock Lee]

I don't think size is a factor for either. In my ONA work when we have surveyed what critical information people receive either from others or information repositories I typically find the information demands rarely reflect what top down governance might design. In fact I believe the top down approach leads to a lot of waste and information repositories that are heavily under-utilised. The other common finding is the much larger degree of human brokers to information repositories that exist than one might expect. In other words people rely more on other people to access information repositories because they can get a qualified response rather than having to rely on the quality of the raw data. 

Laurence Lock Lee PhD
Partner, Optimice Pty Ltd
Ph: +61 (0)407001628
www.optimice.com.au
Blog: http://governanceandnetworks.blogspot.com/
 
Learn to network, then network to learn