Value Networks Google Group

Strategic Mapping for Networks - excellent by Steve Waddell

f...@vernaallee.com (Fran) — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:42:46 UT

Steve Waddell has posted an excellent blog here - [link]
Steve has been active on his blog and it is certainly worth a look at
his website - [link]
This particular post was reposted at [link]

Psychogeography: Remapping the World

kisl...@yahoo.com (Khaled Islaih) — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 01:04:03 UT

Hi,

Interesting inclusive geographical perceptions generated by the growing use of social media and social networking in our lives around the world....!

Khaled
Remapping the World

"Political borders remain among the most fundamental obstacles to human progress around the world. And yet while a borderless world could be a great thing, we can't assume it into being. We have to actually build it. Nothing would make a greater contribution toward removing justifications for armed conflict and toward economic development. In the next decade, drawing a new map of the world won't be just a worthy goal, it will become a moral, economic and strategic imperative.

Re: Business ecosystem orchestrator

m...@davidmeggitt.com (David Meggitt) — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:09:32 UT

Hi, I've stuck something up on Wikipedia which does not conform to the
formal standards, but, hopefully, something will emerge!
I am using the term with some ease now in circles ranging from
manufacturing to Islamic finance. No problem. Try it out.Join the
fray!!
David

Change in Complex Systems with Dennis O'Donoghue, VP Boeing Test & Evaluation

f...@vernaallee.com (Fran) — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:56:58 UT

This Pegasus Webinar will be March 10.
Adapt and Perform: What Boeing Can Teach You about Change in Complex
Systems with Dennis O’Donoghue, VP Boeing Test & Evaluation, a 90-
minute live webinar for leaders and managers grappling with large-
scale change Wednesday, March 10 at 2:00–3:30 pm EST.
Dennis O’Donoghue will explain how Boeing’s Flight Validation and Test

CFP : ASONAM 2010 (Deadline Extended)

tansel...@gmail.com (tanseletu@gmail.com) — Mon, 01 Mar 2010 08:23:22 UT

Apologies if you receive multiple copies of this announcement and
please let me know if you prefer to be excluded from all further
ASONAM communications.)
ASONAM 2010 - CALL FOR PAPERS
(Extended papers will appear in two special issues)
Please note that OSINT-WM 2010 ([link]) will be held in

Re: Mike 2.0 and VNA

llock...@optimice.com.au (Laurence Lock Lee) — Fri, 19 Feb 2010 03:32:26 UT

I don't think size is a factor for either. In my ONA work when we have surveyed what critical information people receive either from others or information repositories I typically find the information demands rarely reflect what top down governance might design. In fact I believe the top down approach leads to a lot of waste and information repositories that are heavily under-utilised. The other common finding is the much larger degree of human brokers to information repositories that exist than one might expect. In other words people rely more on other people to access information repositories because they can get a qualified response rather than having to rely on the quality of the raw data.

Re: Mike 2.0 and VNA

mar...@cleaver.org (Martin@Cleaver.org) — Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:13:55 UT

Ah, right, thanks Laurence.
So MIKE 2.0 strives at similar objectives - to manage the quantity and type
of information - but it assumes that an authority can know the extent of the
information that emerges and is capable of making central decisions about
it?
Do you think that a governance model could distribute responsibility back to

Re: Mike 2.0 and VNA

llock...@optimice.com.au (Laurence Lock Lee) — Thu, 18 Feb 2010 22:43:46 UT

I had a quick browse, but for me it isn't a natural fit. It looks like a typical top down information management framework with perhaps a slight acknowledgement of the networks near the bottom on the collaborative environments. Information is only one dimension of value. Top down compliance is different to the peer to peer accountability that VNA promotes.

Mike 2.0 and VNA

mar...@cleaver.org (Martin@Cleaver.org) — Thu, 18 Feb 2010 20:52:38 UT

Hi all,
Has anyone here tried to put VNA into the context of Deloitte's MIKE
2.0 OPEN SOURCE STANDARD FOR INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
[link] ?
VNA would seem a natural fit, but my search got no
hits<[link]>

Re: Mesoeconomics

bd...@nextnow.net (Bill Daul) — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:19:04 UT

Khaled,
Do you live in Canada or ? I would love to meet/chat sometime.
--bill

Re: Mesoeconomics

kisl...@yahoo.com (Khaled Islaih) — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 04:24:59 UT

Hi Eric,

Thanks for sharing these informative links. During my navigation in these links I found other relevant transformational concepts such as binary economics and integral nondualisim.
[link]

[link]

Again thank you very much for this enlightenment,

Re: Enriching Context for Business Processes

m3pou...@yahoo.com (Michael _P) — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:07:50 UT

I do agree with << Value Network modeling is a fast and effective way
to capture the context behind business processes. The Enterprise
Edition can bring together data from workflow and process tools along
with HR staffing tools to predict exactly where your work packages or
processes are most likely to break down - and show how to more

Re: Enriching Context for Business Processes

f...@vernaallee.com (Fran) — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 18:33:57 UT

Apologies for links not showing up.
Here is Jim Sinur -
[link]
Here is Carol Rozwell -
[link]

Enriching Context for Business Processes

f...@vernaallee.com (Fran) — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 18:29:46 UT

Instead of plugging people into processes, why not wrap processes
around people?
In a recent blog, The Winds of Change, Gartner's Jim Sinur suggests
this and more:
"Processes need to wrap themselves around people in way that seems
unthinkable today. This will only happen when the processes are
context enriched.

Re: Mesoeconomics

ejhof...@gmail.com (Eric Hoffer) — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 16:39:17 UT

This paper is a good place to start: [link] [1] particularly
for its relating to (all) the traditional elements (and references for
you). The point, for me, being that it isn't a thing unto itself, but a
recognition of holistics <[link]> [2]. And after all, isn't
that the nature, if not the point, of vna?