Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
ValidateThis
Home
+ new post
About this group
Join this group
Message from discussion The property [n] was not found in the object passed into the validation object.
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Bob Silverberg  
View profile  
 More options Mar 23 2012, 9:26 am
From: Bob Silverberg <bob.silverb...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:26:19 -0400
Local: Fri, Mar 23 2012 9:26 am
Subject: Re: [ValidateThis] The property [n] was not found in the object passed into the validation object.
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
Are you able to isolate the code in the fw that's causing a problem?
It does seem to me that if you are only doing a custom validation that
it shouldn't care whether the property exists or not, so maybe a fix
can be made which wouldn't require any defaults to change.  I'll look
into it when I can, but I figured that if you've been looking at the
code maybe you can point out exactly where the problem is occurring.

Thanks,
Bob

On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Rawlins <rob...@supporttime.com> wrote:
> Hello Guys,

> I've got a strange issue which has crept in at some point. I have an object
> that has validation on a virtual property, this means the property
> doesn't technically exist (no getter/setter), but the rules that apply to it
> are all custom so it shouldn't need to invoke the property directly.

> <property name="NoRemainingStock" desc="No remaining stock">
> <rule type="custom" contexts="delete" failureMessage="You cannot delete a
> stock location whilst it still contains stock.">
> <param name="methodName" value="hasNoRemainingStock" />
> </rule>
> </property>

> When I try to validate this object I get an error:

>                The property NoRemainingStock was not found in the object
> passed into the validation object.

> Now, I'm sure this was working several weeks ago when we built the feature,
> however, I believe at some point I may have upgraded the framework (from
> 0.99) and this issue obviously slipped through my testing.

> Looking through GitHub it seems that some work was done on a
> ignoreMissingProperty feature - that results in exceptions like this. It
> seems I have to now pass a new argument into the validate() method if my
> object has virtual properties like this, is that correct?

> If so, then this causes quite a lot of extra leg work for me as a developer
> as I use virtual properties like this quite extensively. Is it possible to
> suggest that we have the default for this setting as a framework wide
> configuration?

> Can anyone offer any advice / opinions?

> Thanks guys,

> Robert

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "ValidateThis" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/validatethis/-/hibB8I1G-XMJ.
> To post to this group, send email to validatethis@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> validatethis+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/validatethis?hl=en.

--
Bob Silverberg
www.silverwareconsulting.com

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google