Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Breaking!: Massive voter fraud reported in Wisconsin election. Portent of things to come in November?
4 views
Skip to first unread message
anodial tow
Jun 9, 2012, 3:55:31 PM6/9/12
to
Bill Shatzer wrote:
> Sancho Panza wrote:
>> On 6/9/2012 1:13 AM, Bill Shatzer wrote:
>>
>>> Sancho Panza wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/8/2012 6:36 PM, anodial tow wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Bill Shatzer wrote:
>
>>>>>>> The candidates and supporters are anxious to learn the results so I
>>>>>>> suspect there would be a lot of opposition to such a measure.
>
>>>>>> No doubt. Still, waiting 12 or even 24 hours is not going to
>>>>>> seriously
>>>>>> inconvenience anyone.
>
>>>>>> Putting the victory parties and concession speeches off for a day is
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> a big deal.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Well now, it looks like the proto-fascist Moder@tor has a fellow news
>>>>> "suppression" partner who's equally willing to place a time-delay
>>>>> button
>>>>> on our Constitutional freedom of press.
>>>>>
>>>>> How interesting a pairing they make. One wonders how many others will
>>>>> sign on to turn the water up to a rolling boil on the "frog" that our
>>>>> Constitution has become...
>>>
>>>
>>>> This group of posters has quite a history of disrespecting the
>>>> Constitution and what surrounds it.
>
>>> Article 1, section 4. Congress may regulate the time, place, and manner
>>> of federal elections.
>
>> Which has what to do with censoring what is supposed to be the free
>> press?
>
> No one is censoring the free press.
Not presently, but it is what you fascists are proposing - "suppression".
> What Moder@tor and I are suggesting is merely slightly delaying the
> release of certain information to the "free press".
What he stated was:
"No one is forbidding the media of freedom of speech, just asking them
to surpress information for one day while the voting process happens."
"Only taking the temporary ban a step further."
"Unconstitutional to forbid election day coverage? How so?"
"I'm all for a media blackout on election data and stories on election
day..."
> Or, with my
> suggestion to delay the counting of ballots for 12 to 24 hours after the
> polls close, delaying the creation of the actual information itself.
Ah yes, an even further abuse, suppressing the actual election itself!
You fascists are simply not to be trusted with OUR Constitution!
What in earth is wrong with you anyway?
> The press remains free to say what it will. It merely does so without
> the official election vote counts - which counts would not exist until
> the counting machines are turned on or the ballot boxes opened and the
> ballots actually tabulated.
>
> peace and justice,
How many times will you "delay" US elections MORE than your proposed
12-24 hours if you terrorists get your way?
Did you consult Putin before you came up with this creative revision of
our democratic process?
> Sancho Panza wrote:
>> On 6/9/2012 1:13 AM, Bill Shatzer wrote:
>>
>>> Sancho Panza wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/8/2012 6:36 PM, anodial tow wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Bill Shatzer wrote:
>
>>>>>>> The candidates and supporters are anxious to learn the results so I
>>>>>>> suspect there would be a lot of opposition to such a measure.
>
>>>>>> No doubt. Still, waiting 12 or even 24 hours is not going to
>>>>>> seriously
>>>>>> inconvenience anyone.
>
>>>>>> Putting the victory parties and concession speeches off for a day is
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> a big deal.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Well now, it looks like the proto-fascist Moder@tor has a fellow news
>>>>> "suppression" partner who's equally willing to place a time-delay
>>>>> button
>>>>> on our Constitutional freedom of press.
>>>>>
>>>>> How interesting a pairing they make. One wonders how many others will
>>>>> sign on to turn the water up to a rolling boil on the "frog" that our
>>>>> Constitution has become...
>>>
>>>
>>>> This group of posters has quite a history of disrespecting the
>>>> Constitution and what surrounds it.
>
>>> Article 1, section 4. Congress may regulate the time, place, and manner
>>> of federal elections.
>
>> Which has what to do with censoring what is supposed to be the free
>> press?
>
> No one is censoring the free press.
Not presently, but it is what you fascists are proposing - "suppression".
> What Moder@tor and I are suggesting is merely slightly delaying the
> release of certain information to the "free press".
What he stated was:
"No one is forbidding the media of freedom of speech, just asking them
to surpress information for one day while the voting process happens."
"Only taking the temporary ban a step further."
"Unconstitutional to forbid election day coverage? How so?"
"I'm all for a media blackout on election data and stories on election
day..."
> Or, with my
> suggestion to delay the counting of ballots for 12 to 24 hours after the
> polls close, delaying the creation of the actual information itself.
Ah yes, an even further abuse, suppressing the actual election itself!
You fascists are simply not to be trusted with OUR Constitution!
What in earth is wrong with you anyway?
> The press remains free to say what it will. It merely does so without
> the official election vote counts - which counts would not exist until
> the counting machines are turned on or the ballot boxes opened and the
> ballots actually tabulated.
>
> peace and justice,
How many times will you "delay" US elections MORE than your proposed
12-24 hours if you terrorists get your way?
Did you consult Putin before you came up with this creative revision of
our democratic process?
0 new messages