In Ol' Virginny, As Foreseen, Bob McDonnell And Pat Robertson Share The Same Views!
Jesus'sPedoBoy
RUMOR has it that Robertson has directed governor-elect McDonnell to
rename the Virginia State Capitol Building "Jesus House" -- no
kidding!
--------------------
"Mr. McDonnell's albatross"
"Pat Robertson, casual bigot and major donor"
Editorial
The Washington Post
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
RELIABLE NUMBERS are hard to come by, but at a very conservative guess
there are tens of thousands of Muslims living in Virginia. Now one of
the top financial donors to Robert F. McDonnell, the state's governor-
elect, has smeared them all by saying that their faith is not a
religion at all, but rather a "violent political system." Doesn't Mr.
McDonnell owe them and other Virginians some reassurance that he
doesn't share Pat Robertson's despicable view?
Over Mr. Robertson's long and tiresome years as a television talking
head, his hate-filled and puerile utterings have been so copious that
it has been a fool's game to grace each of them with a response. Why
get in a sweat denouncing someone who says he'd like to plant a
nuclear device in the State Department; that various mainstream
Protestant denominations embody the spirit of the Antichrist; that
Hinduism is "demonic"; and that Scotland is a "dark land" overrun by
homosexuals? In general, the better retort to such drivel is
disdainful silence and occasional laughter.
Yet beyond his broadcast blather, Mr. Robertson has injected himself
into the public arena as a major financier for conservative political
candidates, in particular for Mr. McDonnell. Mr. McDonnell has tried
to have this arrangement both ways. On the one hand, he has bristled
at journalists who have asked about his ties with Mr. Robertson,
dismissing questions about their longstanding relationship as
irrelevant and insignificant. On the other hand, he has gladly
accepted Mr. Robertson's campaign cash in his various races for the
Virginia legislature, state attorney general and governor -- donations
that add up to $106,000 over the past decade, more than all but three
individuals have given Mr. McDonnell. (And that doesn't count another
$49,000 from Mr. Robertson's son and daughter-in-law.)
The fact is, the two men share a continuing personal and financial
relationship. In addition to attending law school in the 1980s at what
was then called CBN University, the Virginia Beach school founded by
Mr. Robertson and named for his Christian Broadcasting Network, Mr.
McDonnell served eight years as a trustee of the same institution
after it was renamed Regent University. He was featured last year as
the graduation speaker at Regent's law school, and has appeared as a
guest on Mr. Robertson's TV show, "The 700 Club." On election night
two weeks ago, Mr. Robertson said he was paying the candidate a call
in his hotel suite as the results came in.
It's unfair to expect politicians to be held accountable for every
asinine thing that a supporter happens to say. But in this case --
when the supporter is among Mr. McDonnell's most prominent associates,
and the level of support is extremely high -- it's important to know
that he is as disgusted by Mr. Robertson's casual bigotry as millions
of his constituents are.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/17/AR2009111703409.html
================
Swiss no longer shielding biggest U.S. tax dodgers
IRS divulges criteria for requesting UBS account disclosures
By David S. Hilzenrath
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
If your secret Swiss bank account was small enough, you can breathe
easier: A landmark deal between the United States and Switzerland to
expose American tax dodgers does not call for the Swiss to blow your
cover.
But if you exceeded certain thresholds and failed to disclose the
account to the Internal Revenue Service, don't count on Switzerland's
legendary tradition of bank secrecy to protect you any longer. Your
account details may be on their way to U.S. tax collectors and federal
prosecutors.
That is the upshot of a previously confidential annex to a settlement
reached in August by the IRS with the Swiss government and Swiss
banking giant UBS.
The IRS revealed Tuesday that Swiss authorities did not have to spill
the beans on Americans who had less than $248,200 (250,000 Swiss
francs) in their accounts or received less than $99,280 (100,000 Swiss
francs) in annual revenue from them.
Before the showdown over UBS, Swiss law generally shielded depositors
whose only offense was failing to disclose assets and income on tax
forms. To jeopardize their entitlement to secrecy, bank clients had to
engage in more overt acts of concealment, described as "fraud and the
like."
According to the newly unveiled annex, however, the Swiss appear to
have stretched the definition of that kind of subterfuge. Under the
annex, Switzerland defined "fraud and the like" to include failure to
provide a W-9 disclosure form for three years if the account met two
measures: having more than $992,802 (1 million Swiss francs) at any
time from 2001 through 2008, and generating average annual revenue of
more than 100,000 Swiss francs over three years.
The agreement also covers accounts of at least 250,000 Swiss francs if
the American depositors used an off-shore shell company to hide
ownership of the funds and if they engaged in a "scheme of lies." That
could include using calling cards to disguise trading orders, and
using debit cards, credit cards or loans to mask withdrawals from the
Swiss accounts.
Under the sometimes fuzzy terms of the international agreement, the
Swiss have not explicitly promised to turn over the account
information, only to "process" a U.S. request. Nonetheless, the U.S.
government has made clear that, once the Swiss review runs its course,
it expects to get details on about 4,450 accounts.
"Switzerland is no longer a place where Americans can freely think
that their account information will be forever protected," said Scott
D. Michel of the law firm Caplin & Drysdale, which represents UBS
clients.
The Swiss government said it has 40 people processing the disclosure
requests. UBS admitted early this year that it schemed to defraud the
U.S. government by helping Americans hide money in secret Swiss
accounts. The bank surreptitiously recruited wealthy Americans as
clients and then helped some of them set up shell companies to obscure
their connection to the accounts.
To avoid a potentially ruinous criminal prosecution, UBS agreed to pay
the U.S. government $780 million. Then, the U.S. government stepped up
a civil action against UBS, asking a federal court to force the bank
to disclose the holders of 52,000 accounts. Through the deal struck in
August, the two governments chose accommodation over confrontation,
with face-saving measures for both sides. The U.S. government has
accepted the possibility that some people who used UBS to evade taxes
will get away with it.
Details as to which accounts the two governments would target for
disclosure under the agreement were withheld until Tuesday to keep
depositors guessing about their risk of being exposed -- and to keep
them under pressure to confess in return for an IRS offer of leniency.
The offer, originally set to expire in September, was extended to mid-
October. As the deadline loomed, a crush of depositors filed voluntary
disclosures. All told, more than 14,700 people turned themselves in
under the IRS leniency program, more than 12,000 of them after the
deal with Switzerland was announced, IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman
said in a briefing Tuesday.
Those figures went beyond UBS clients to include people with accounts
at other banks and in other countries; Shulman did not provide a
subtotal for UBS.
It was not immediately clear how much money the government stands to
recoup from taxpayers who turned themselves in or face exposure under
the UBS settlement.
"We are talking about billions of dollars coming into the U.S.
Treasury," Shulman said.
On Capitol Hill, the deal came under sharp criticism from Sen. Carl M.
Levin (D-Mich.), who leads the Senate Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs Committee's permanent subcommittee on
investigations.
"[T]he tortured wording and the many limitations in this annex shows
the Swiss government trying to preserve as much bank secrecy as it can
for the future, while pushing to conceal the names of tens of
thousands of suspected U.S. tax cheats," he said in a statement. "It
is disappointing that the U.S. government went along."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/17/AR2009111701240.html
little horny
WE HAVE NOTHING TO LOSE!