On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> wrote:Correction: if you use an UNLocker in library-level code, be sure that at
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Charles Lowell <cowb...@thefrontside.net>wrote:
>> I noticed that if I initialize v8 in one thread, and then try and do
> To expand a tiny bit on Mads' answer: if your library-level routines will
least one Locker is in place (ideally in main() or equivalent).
A bit of background: i added a v8 binding for the C sleep() routine and it
the point being to free up v8 for activity while sleep() was doing nothing.
The problem is that if there is no Locker in place, the Unlocker will
So i recommend adding a Locker to the base v8 initialization code for a
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.