From: Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:28:39 +0200
Local: Tues, Jun 7 2011 10:28 am
Subject: Re: [v8-users] Crash in webserver when declaring very first HandleScope
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> wrote: Correction: if you use an UNLocker in library-level code, be sure that at > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Charles Lowell <cowb...@thefrontside.net>wrote: >> I noticed that if I initialize v8 in one thread, and then try and do > To expand a tiny bit on Mads' answer: if your library-level routines will least one Locker is in place (ideally in main() or equivalent). A bit of background: i added a v8 binding for the C sleep() routine and it Unlocker sentry; the point being to free up v8 for activity while sleep() was doing nothing. The problem is that if there is no Locker in place, the Unlocker will So i recommend adding a Locker to the base v8 initialization code for a -- You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||