Received: by 10.50.171.102 with SMTP id at6mr3530529igc.1.1349348101584;
        Thu, 04 Oct 2012 03:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: v8-users@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.43.90.135 with SMTP id bi7ls5701962icc.3.gmail; Thu, 04 Oct
 2012 03:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.146.4 with SMTP id h4mr2998275icv.21.1349348098377;
        Thu, 04 Oct 2012 03:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.146.4 with SMTP id h4mr2998274icv.21.1349348098368;
        Thu, 04 Oct 2012 03:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <rossb...@google.com>
Received: from mail-ob0-f170.google.com (mail-ob0-f170.google.com [209.85.214.170])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i2si2092257igl.1.2012.10.04.03.54.58
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Thu, 04 Oct 2012 03:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rossb...@google.com designates 209.85.214.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.170;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rossb...@google.com designates 209.85.214.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rossb...@google.com; dkim=pass header...@google.com
Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id ni5so334034obc.29
        for <v8-users@googlegroups.com>; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 03:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type:x-system-of-record;
        bh=6nruNtdFSQuE3f/i+pA9K0zHFYqFL8PTBE1fNgQgb+A=;
        b=NHgPqKSDSbwrfnf73gy35ub4EzAjyWWqKBa9ejm+QUJE7cSP9IEPdFekigYbiM4KMS
         nQ353y3QanYPJ1mBfUwJeDnh4gdn2k2fSV9TLoc+X0+zhtO5cK2tCQRg1ALTpQM+SUB7
         c2VqoRwhTv1tsPOG6HBHzncFzGdStj2eNs7P8/8iWJEPX/Fc/L7fnf+aQ4PrhlIXseTj
         PlWf9t8E4cOBl8v+z4DomUttH/uEIAV2R0b2NhjfY15y40GQdiyJBvWPfIw2tYzbN7EA
         rkg7tCcoc7J5Be2Y6hyuDk4ZqqRjNlhy8iRQEV9kzCqhTCC0hwdK/O3N9uXyJGepzwXQ
         LcEA==
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type:x-system-of-record:x-gm-message-state;
        bh=6nruNtdFSQuE3f/i+pA9K0zHFYqFL8PTBE1fNgQgb+A=;
        b=NW7Q5owDk76AUavNve/6V8PJqsmJBizNleBL9qQ5ZRVx8QNJTOia79HL7U3lDHqlAY
         x+6BtciZd9mXSnKta0O1HcRJr7o7z12fLit30+nLjtVnzPU9KqKhiGeRBVdlEYYLDICR
         fn9gfRuFSelgjaff5yALfETwmSROycdK2q44xvQkvEBD2WP2XnQxT0n7T56VPNPrXe4T
         SdBG71gEXaZeLK29RzeVsn8EzS7bjUVW72alFD+nQLHq5PJtQJEKU+VDTcv84732THu8
         K4ReQuwnapUZCvHWfR/mfXaTVylqjZ+QyOX97F48TkWZTf9tUnu4hVYHmJFn55dksdF9
         HntA==
Received: by 10.60.169.134 with SMTP id ae6mr3973576oec.55.1349348098042; Thu,
 04 Oct 2012 03:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.77.74 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 03:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8f14f530-036a-4ccf-b04e-e6ccd73a4c0a@googlegroups.com>
References: <8f14f530-036a-4ccf-b04e-e6ccd73a4c0a@googlegroups.com>
From: Andreas Rossberg <rossb...@google.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 12:54:37 +0200
Message-ID: <CADjR9NrHNXjhVXWfrMxiPt9iVvgOAo7GHb3_QSz9heCAkVF...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [v8-users] Are generators or `yield` coming any time soon?
To: v8-users@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkFQrWkKXm++iUoIzxj6SyzEEP+SBEez7xMpQ235RT3LmfraTN5DkxH2r9cKUI4NP0UXnGmzUCrv3dE1nPOBDojl+yUVEgfDZvTfzCHRHGGp1BGy8BgM40qqHYEvPF3rnekdWxr6N6CqdleVHB/TwoZEgcNYRh0PJYhGFuk9T29pKPVbcbowjCQLRZgQLjOnaFe0s3cJTcxqNONurXMBcJ7BSoyzg==

On 2 October 2012 22:36, James Long <longs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is `yield` on the roadmap at all for v8? It would be awesome if so. I think
> it's about time.

It's certainly on the radar, and will probably be one of the next
major features we turn our attention to. But there are no concrete
plans yet.

/Andreas