Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
x86_64 support
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  4 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
roelof.na...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Sep 3 2008, 3:54 am
From: roelof.na...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 00:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Sep 3 2008 3:54 am
Subject: x86_64 support
hi

are there any plans to support x86_64? from the code it looks like
only ia32 and arm are supported.

regards
roelof.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Christian Plesner Hansen  
View profile  
 More options Sep 3 2008, 4:42 am
From: Christian Plesner Hansen <christian.plesner.han...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 01:42:15 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Sep 3 2008 4:42 am
Subject: Re: x86_64 support
There should be no problems running v8 on x86_64.  Internally v8 only
ever runs 32 bit so the ia32 architecture is also used on x86_64.

On Sep 3, 9:54 am, roelof.na...@gmail.com wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Erik Corry  
View profile  
 More options Sep 3 2008, 7:24 am
From: Erik Corry <erik.co...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 04:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Sep 3 2008 7:24 am
Subject: Re: x86_64 support
I think what roslof probably meant was whether we planned to create a
64 bit version of V8.

This hasn't been decided yet.  Chromium is 32 bit at the moment, and
since all OSs still support 32 bit programs this isn't a pressing
issue.

Since JavaScript is a dynamically typed language you always have to
reserve space for an object reference so a 64 bit version of V8 would
use almost twice as much memory for objects and on stacks.  Code would
also grow.  At the moment there is no register allocation worth
speaking of in the code generator so there would be no immediate
benefit from the extra registers available to 64 bit code.

On Sep 3, 10:42 am, Christian Plesner Hansen


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
roelof.na...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Sep 3 2008, 7:27 am
From: roelof.na...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 04:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Sep 3 2008 7:27 am
Subject: Re: x86_64 support
On Sep 3, 1:24 pm, Erik Corry <erik.co...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think what roslof probably meant was whether we planned to create a
> 64 bit version of V8.

> This hasn't been decided yet.  Chromium is 32 bit at the moment, and
> since all OSs still support 32 bit programs this isn't a pressing
> issue.

> Since JavaScript is a dynamically typed language you always have to
> reserve space for an object reference so a 64 bit version of V8 would
> use almost twice as much memory for objects and on stacks.  Code would
> also grow.  At the moment there is no register allocation worth
> speaking of in the code generator so there would be no immediate
> benefit from the extra registers available to 64 bit code.

thank you for the answer. i was thinking of support for 64bit code
generation etc.

roelof.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google