Issue 1609 in v8: NewGC: Code flushing is disabled by MarkCompactCollector::Prepare

6 views
Skip to first unread message

codesite...@google.com

unread,
Aug 12, 2011, 9:32:14 AM8/12/11
to v8-...@googlegroups.com
Status: Accepted
Owner: vego...@chromium.org
Labels: Type-Bug Priority-Critical NewGC

New issue 1609 by vego...@chromium.org: NewGC: Code flushing is disabled by
MarkCompactCollector::Prepare
http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=1609

It's not entirely clear how to implement code flushing for the incremental
marker but at least we should reenable it for non-incremental collections.

codesite...@google.com

unread,
Sep 29, 2011, 8:34:33 AM9/29/11
to v8-...@googlegroups.com
Updates:
Labels: -Priority-High Priority-Medium

Comment #2 on issue 1609 by veg...@chromium.org: NewGC: Code flushing is

disabled by MarkCompactCollector::Prepare
http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=1609

(No comment was entered for this change.)

codesite...@google.com

unread,
Sep 29, 2011, 10:03:00 AM9/29/11
to v8-...@googlegroups.com

Comment #3 on issue 1609 by veg...@chromium.org: NewGC: Code flushing is
disabled by MarkCompactCollector::Prepare
http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=1609

I have partially re-enabled code flushing in r9484 (full collections will
try to age and flush code).

Work still has to be done on integration with incremental marker.

codesite...@google.com

unread,
Oct 2, 2012, 10:52:00 AM10/2/12
to v8-...@googlegroups.com
Updates:
Owner: mstar...@chromium.org
Cc: veg...@chromium.org

Comment #4 on issue 1609 by mstar...@chromium.org: NewGC: Code flushing
is disabled by MarkCompactCollector::Prepare
http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=1609

I am stealing this one.

codesite...@google.com

unread,
Oct 25, 2012, 6:43:48 AM10/25/12
to v8-...@googlegroups.com
Updates:
Status: Fixed

Comment #5 on issue 1609 by mstar...@chromium.org: NewGC: Code flushing
is disabled by MarkCompactCollector::Prepare
http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=1609

Fixed in r12796, r12734 and r12714. With this we should now be able to
perform incremental code flushing.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages