uw-nt-reu-2011

FYI, all of these values are correct in isomorphism_classes.txt -- I rebuilt this table in May, and

Alright, great, I think the pull request "Added Halberstadt...." has everything for 3.4 now

The version of the sieving code from last summer had a lot of bugs in it causing to frequently miss

Hi, It turns out that we can support a few more participants for this workshop [1] at the end of this

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:39 PM, R. Andrew Ohana <andrew...@gmail.com> wrote: > The

Regarding the Sqrt(5) paper, I'm working on something, and you don't need to do anything

Hi UW Number Theory 2011 REU participants, This is a heads up that there will be a conference April

On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Ben LeVeque <ben.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's so

This is another email relevant to the Q(sqrt(5)) project... ---------- Forwarded message ----------

Hi everyone! Good news -- the T-shirts have arrived at my house in Seattle (I am now in Providence...

That sounds interesting. I'll take a look at it when I get the chance. Ariah On Wed, Aug 24, 2011

Hi everybody! Some slight bad news -- it turns out that using the table as the design for the back of

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Noam Elkies <elk...@math.harvard.edu> Date: Tue,

I got 1) and 2) by showing a) H_{i,i} | H_{j,j} for i > j b) H_{i,i} = gcd(H_i) where H_i is the i

On Aug 16, 2011 8:04 AM, "Noam Elkies" <elk...@math.harvard.edu> wrote: > >

Yes, the code works with the correct a_p. This will "re-find" the 1476 in a few minutes:

On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Noam Elkies <elk...@math.harvard.edu> wrote: > Hi William,

Also, attached is the PDF version of the table(without graphs) On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Paul

I'll be there. On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Ben LeVeque <ben.l...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Paul, Can you make it a super-high priority for today to make this table complete to norm

On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Jonathan Bober <jwb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Awesome! >

I have an implementation of the Theorem 4.4.1 (finding an upper bound on the difference between naive

Hi Tom, Sorry I didn't respond to this, because I've been pretty busy with an undergrad REU

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Jonathan Bober <jwb...@gmail.com> wrote: > No time for me

Hi, Is anyone interested in grabbing lunch today? I think we will be heading out a bit after 1:00. -

Did we find curve with Norm conductor 1984? If so, could someone post the curve for me please, as I

-- William Stein Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org

On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Jonathan Bober <jwb...@gmail.com> wrote: Does anyone know a

I am finishing up reading about height and saturation. I am currently reading through Martin

Sounds good! On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 12:20 PM, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: Want to