Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: #Salt Lake (City) Tribune Endorses Obama..... That's gotta be a blow
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Dänk 42Ø
Oct 20, 2012, 1:08:39 PM10/20/12
to
On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 02:47:59 +0000, 3196 Dead quacked:
> Salt Lake (City) Tribune Endorses Obama..... That's gotta be a blow to
> Robmey!
>
> http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/opinion/55019844-82/romney-obama-state-
> president.html.csp
>
> Tribune Endorsement: Too Many Mitts
>
> Obama has earned another term First Published 8 hours ago • Updated 1
> hour ago
>
> Nowhere has Mitt Romney’s pursuit of the presidency been more warmly
> welcomed or closely followed than here in Utah. The Republican nominee’s
> political and religious pedigrees, his adeptly bipartisan governorship
> of a Democratic state, and his head for business and the bottom line all
> inspire admiration and hope in our largely Mormon, Republican, business-
> friendly state.
It doesn't matter who the Salt Lake City Tribune endorses, since the
Stepford people will vote for whoever their Ayatollah tells them to.
Though I am temporarily occupying space in Utah, I don't read or watch
the local news, because I do not care about Stepford people or the gawd-
forsaken wasteland they call "Zion." However, I would say that the SLC
Tribune is not representative of Utah majority opinion, since the
official Stepford paper is the Deseret News. Salt Lake City is only 50%
Stepford, and since Stepfords already have their own propaganda rag, the
Tribune relies on non-Stepfords to buy its newspapers and it is them it
is pandering to when it endorses Chairman Obama.
It's always Christmas in Stepford!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mW42lBPbuTc
> Salt Lake (City) Tribune Endorses Obama..... That's gotta be a blow to
> Robmey!
>
> http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/opinion/55019844-82/romney-obama-state-
> president.html.csp
>
> Tribune Endorsement: Too Many Mitts
>
> Obama has earned another term First Published 8 hours ago • Updated 1
> hour ago
>
> Nowhere has Mitt Romney’s pursuit of the presidency been more warmly
> welcomed or closely followed than here in Utah. The Republican nominee’s
> political and religious pedigrees, his adeptly bipartisan governorship
> of a Democratic state, and his head for business and the bottom line all
> inspire admiration and hope in our largely Mormon, Republican, business-
> friendly state.
It doesn't matter who the Salt Lake City Tribune endorses, since the
Stepford people will vote for whoever their Ayatollah tells them to.
Though I am temporarily occupying space in Utah, I don't read or watch
the local news, because I do not care about Stepford people or the gawd-
forsaken wasteland they call "Zion." However, I would say that the SLC
Tribune is not representative of Utah majority opinion, since the
official Stepford paper is the Deseret News. Salt Lake City is only 50%
Stepford, and since Stepfords already have their own propaganda rag, the
Tribune relies on non-Stepfords to buy its newspapers and it is them it
is pandering to when it endorses Chairman Obama.
It's always Christmas in Stepford!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mW42lBPbuTc
3196 Dead
Oct 20, 2012, 2:53:39 PM10/20/12
to
back to at least 1948. Over all those elections, were they also
pandering, or is it only pandering when they do it for the party you
don't swear allegiance to?
Dänk 42Ø
Oct 20, 2012, 3:42:45 PM10/20/12
to
On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 18:53:39 +0000, 3196 Dead quacked:
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 12:08:39 -0500, Dänk 42Ø wrote:
>> ............. since Stepfords already have their own propaganda rag,
read the Tribune, I don't what political slant it has, but since the
Deseret News has the arch-conservative theofascist slant covered, it
seems logical that its rival would take an opposing position.
> Over all those elections, were they also
> pandering, or is it only pandering when they do it for the party you
> don't swear allegiance to?
And which party does your drug-ravaged brain imagine that I swear
allegiance to? Oh, that's right, you like to accuse me of being a
Republican, even though I describe that party as "theofascist" and
demanded Emperor Bush's impeachment:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.libertarian/msg/
bb0a626142046e39?dmode=source
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:56:12 GMT "dank" wrote:
"I've always been registered as independent but usually vote Libertarian
or sometimes other minor parties as a protest vote. Since our political
crisis is so serious right now, I plan to register Democrat and vote in
that party's primary with the sole intent of defeating my Democratic
congressional representative unless he votes to impeach before then."
[Note: Why Zepp continues to accuse me of being a Republican when my
archived posts prove otherwise is a mystery, except perhaps that he has
gone senile from all the PCP he did in the 1970s.]
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 12:08:39 -0500, Dänk 42Ø wrote:
>> the Tribune relies on non-Stepfords to buy its newspapers and it is
>> them it is pandering to when it endorses Chairman Obama.
>>
>> It's always Christmas in Stepford!
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mW42lBPbuTc
>
> This is a newspaper that has faithfully supported the GOP candidate
> going back to at least 1948.
SLC has become increasingly diversified in recent years. Since I don't
>> them it is pandering to when it endorses Chairman Obama.
>>
>> It's always Christmas in Stepford!
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mW42lBPbuTc
>
> This is a newspaper that has faithfully supported the GOP candidate
> going back to at least 1948.
read the Tribune, I don't what political slant it has, but since the
Deseret News has the arch-conservative theofascist slant covered, it
seems logical that its rival would take an opposing position.
> Over all those elections, were they also
> pandering, or is it only pandering when they do it for the party you
> don't swear allegiance to?
allegiance to? Oh, that's right, you like to accuse me of being a
Republican, even though I describe that party as "theofascist" and
demanded Emperor Bush's impeachment:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.libertarian/msg/
bb0a626142046e39?dmode=source
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:56:12 GMT "dank" wrote:
"I've always been registered as independent but usually vote Libertarian
or sometimes other minor parties as a protest vote. Since our political
crisis is so serious right now, I plan to register Democrat and vote in
that party's primary with the sole intent of defeating my Democratic
congressional representative unless he votes to impeach before then."
[Note: Why Zepp continues to accuse me of being a Republican when my
archived posts prove otherwise is a mystery, except perhaps that he has
gone senile from all the PCP he did in the 1970s.]
3196 Dead
Oct 20, 2012, 4:13:24 PM10/20/12
to
On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 14:42:45 -0500, Dänk 42Ø wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 18:53:39 +0000, 3196 Dead quacked:
>
>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 12:08:39 -0500, Dänk 42Ø wrote:
>>> ............. since Stepfords already have their own propaganda rag,
>>> the Tribune relies on non-Stepfords to buy its newspapers and it is
>>> them it is pandering to when it endorses Chairman Obama.
>>>
>>> It's always Christmas in Stepford!
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mW42lBPbuTc
>>
>> This is a newspaper that has faithfully supported the GOP candidate
>> going back to at least 1948.
>
> SLC has become increasingly diversified in recent years. Since I don't
> read the Tribune, I don't what political slant it has, but since the
> Deseret News has the arch-conservative theofascist slant covered, it
> seems logical that its rival would take an opposing position.
And you think this is a bad thing for why?
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 18:53:39 +0000, 3196 Dead quacked:
>
>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 12:08:39 -0500, Dänk 42Ø wrote:
>>> ............. since Stepfords already have their own propaganda rag,
>>> the Tribune relies on non-Stepfords to buy its newspapers and it is
>>> them it is pandering to when it endorses Chairman Obama.
>>>
>>> It's always Christmas in Stepford!
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mW42lBPbuTc
>>
>> This is a newspaper that has faithfully supported the GOP candidate
>> going back to at least 1948.
>
> SLC has become increasingly diversified in recent years. Since I don't
> read the Tribune, I don't what political slant it has, but since the
> Deseret News has the arch-conservative theofascist slant covered, it
> seems logical that its rival would take an opposing position.
>
>
>
>> Over all those elections, were they also pandering, or is it only
>> pandering when they do it for the party you don't swear allegiance to?
>
> And which party does your drug-ravaged brain imagine that I swear
> allegiance to? Oh, that's right, you like to accuse me of being a
> Republican, even though I describe that party as "theofascist" and
> demanded Emperor Bush's impeachment:
>
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.libertarian/msg/
> bb0a626142046e39?dmode=source
>
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:56:12 GMT "dank" wrote:
>
> "I've always been registered as independent but usually vote Libertarian
> or sometimes other minor parties as a protest vote. Since our political
> crisis is so serious right now, I plan to register Democrat and vote in
> that party's primary with the sole intent of defeating my Democratic
> congressional representative unless he votes to impeach before then."
>
> [Note: Why Zepp continues to accuse me of being a Republican when my
> archived posts prove otherwise is a mystery, except perhaps that he has
> gone senile from all the PCP he did in the 1970s.]
And yet here you are shrieking in outrage because a paper you don't even
>
>
>> Over all those elections, were they also pandering, or is it only
>> pandering when they do it for the party you don't swear allegiance to?
>
> And which party does your drug-ravaged brain imagine that I swear
> allegiance to? Oh, that's right, you like to accuse me of being a
> Republican, even though I describe that party as "theofascist" and
> demanded Emperor Bush's impeachment:
>
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.libertarian/msg/
> bb0a626142046e39?dmode=source
>
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:56:12 GMT "dank" wrote:
>
> "I've always been registered as independent but usually vote Libertarian
> or sometimes other minor parties as a protest vote. Since our political
> crisis is so serious right now, I plan to register Democrat and vote in
> that party's primary with the sole intent of defeating my Democratic
> congressional representative unless he votes to impeach before then."
>
> [Note: Why Zepp continues to accuse me of being a Republican when my
> archived posts prove otherwise is a mystery, except perhaps that he has
> gone senile from all the PCP he did in the 1970s.]
care about had the temerity to endorse Obama. Why should that bother you?
libitardia
Oct 21, 2012, 6:22:42 PM10/21/12
to
On 10/20/2012 2:13 PM, 3196 Dead wrote:
> Why should that bother you?
It may be time to reaquaint people with your lunacy:
> Why should that bother you?
obese bastard:
http://thelunaticgazette.com/zepp/
Zepp was born in Ottawa, Ontario, and spent his formative years living in
various parts of Canada from Halifax to Victoria, and then the UK, South
Africa, and Australia before moving to the United States, where he has
lived for 40 years. Aside from writing, his interests include hiking,
raising dogs and cats, and making computers jump through hoops. His wife of
25 years edits his copy, and bravely attempts to make him sound coherent.
Zepp lives on Mount Shasta.
"Well, that's the funny thing about terrorists. If they get what they
want, they stop being terrorists."
--Zepp Jamieson
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=q5sc50lf1id03ms1i9truk78v2dk6052f5%...
"No plane hit the Pentagon. I don't know what did,[...]"
-- Zepp Jamieson
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/39d98c910d3...
If Nevermore tries paying cap gains with a 1040, he'll
be in jail soon enough.
--Zepp Jamieson, Dec 3, 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/30fdaff423e2029b?hl=en&
Message has been deleted
3196 Dead
Oct 21, 2012, 11:05:42 PM10/21/12
to
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 18:24:52 -0600, Yoorghis wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 16:22:42 -0600, libitardia <d...@o.rats> wrote:
>
>>Zepp was born in Ottawa, Ontario, and spent his formative years living
>>in various parts of Canada from Halifax to Victoria, and then the UK,
>>South Africa, and Australia before moving to the United States, where he
>>has lived for 40 years. Aside from writing, his interests include
>>hiking, raising dogs and cats, and making computers jump through hoops.
>>His wife of 25 years edits his copy, and bravely attempts to make him
>>sound coherent. Zepp lives on Mount Shasta.
>
>
> Where's the part about him kicking wingers ass---and making them so
> pissed they have to use personal information as a diversion?
It's pretty pathetic.
Libtardia used to be an American, you know.
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 16:22:42 -0600, libitardia <d...@o.rats> wrote:
>
>>Zepp was born in Ottawa, Ontario, and spent his formative years living
>>in various parts of Canada from Halifax to Victoria, and then the UK,
>>South Africa, and Australia before moving to the United States, where he
>>has lived for 40 years. Aside from writing, his interests include
>>hiking, raising dogs and cats, and making computers jump through hoops.
>>His wife of 25 years edits his copy, and bravely attempts to make him
>>sound coherent. Zepp lives on Mount Shasta.
>
>
> pissed they have to use personal information as a diversion?
It's pretty pathetic.
Libtardia used to be an American, you know.
libitarded
Oct 26, 2012, 2:54:25 PM10/26/12
to
http://online.wsj.com
REVIEW & OUTLOOK
Updated August 24, 2012
Negative $4,019
The Obama years have been brutal on middle-class incomes..
In January 2009, the month President Obama entered the Oval Office and
shortly before he signed his stimulus spending bill, median household
income was $54,983. By June 2012, it had tumbled to $50,964, adjusted
for inflation. (See the chart nearby.) That's $4,019 in lost real
income, a little less than a month's income every year.
el Dorado
Nov 2, 2012, 8:08:23 PM11/2/12
to
On 10/20/2012 1:42 PM, Dänk 42Ø wrote:
> And which party does your drug-ravaged brain imagine that I swear
> allegiance to?
Out of touch with reality on all counts...
> And which party does your drug-ravaged brain imagine that I swear
> allegiance to?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OvnAE8olUxU
And "not as shovel-ready as we expected"...
heh, heh, heh....
0 new messages