Border a seive but "Taco Breath" Bush picks nose
Tom
illegals are pouring across our southern border. Bush would suck a
dead skunk's pecker for a handful of votes, for that latino vote he is
willing to compromise the social and cultural future of America.
Tom
Morton Davis
"Tom" <Vandi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:275fc558.03062...@posting.google.com...
around on fire, you cross posting off topic fucking troll.
<plonk>
-*MORT*-
Papp...@city.net
I agree the U.S. Government could and should put troops on the borders
of the U.S..
All that name calling isn't going to get it done.
It only lowers your status as a credible poster.
Morton Davis
<Papp...@city.net> wrote in message news:3EFAEC84...@city.net...
>
>
> Tom wrote:
> >
> > Whatta turd is the President! US troops all over the world and the
> > illegals are pouring across our southern border. Bush would suck a
> > dead skunk's pecker for a handful of votes, for that latino vote he is
> > willing to compromise the social and cultural future of America.
> >
> > Tom
>
> I agree the U.S. Government could and should put troops on the borders
> of the U.S..
I don't. It's a stupoid idea and likely illegal.
>
> All that name calling isn't going to get it done.
>
> It only lowers your status as a credible poster.
Cross posting a stupid message to newsgroups where it is OFF TOPIC achieved
that right off the bat.
-*MORT*-
Douglas Berry
Vandi...@hotmail.com (Tom) warmed at our fire and told this tale:
Fine. You go pick lettuce. Or be preparedfor the frice to jump 500%
when Americans start demanding living wages.
--
Douglas E. Berry grid...@mindspring.com
http://gridlore.home.mindspring.com/index.html
"Where is the prince who can afford so to cover
his country with troops for its defense, as that
ten thousand men descending from the clouds, might
not,in many places, do an infinite deal of mischief
before a force could be brought together to repel
them?" - BENJAMIN FRANKLIN-1784
Douglas Berry
Papp...@city.net warmed at our fire and told this tale:
>
>
>Tom wrote:
>>
>> Whatta turd is the President! US troops all over the world and the
>> illegals are pouring across our southern border. Bush would suck a
>> dead skunk's pecker for a handful of votes, for that latino vote he is
>> willing to compromise the social and cultural future of America.
>>
>> Tom
>
>I agree the U.S. Government could and should put troops on the borders
>of the U.S..
And do what, fire on unarmed Mexicans families?
Something that both our leadership and the people are just going to
have to learn. The Army are not cops, and using them as cops will be
a disaster. Unless you want to have several hyndred dead men, women
and children a year.
AH#49
>
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 08:52:20 -0400, a wanderer, known to us only as
> Papp...@city.net warmed at our fire and told this tale:
> >I agree the U.S. Government could and should put troops on the borders
> >of the U.S..
>
> And do what, fire on unarmed Mexicans families?
If they OR the more Evil Canadians are entering illegally, I don't have
a problem with that.
Tom
Upon reflection, Americans would pay more for food to avoid their
nation being flooded with third-world biocultural aliens.
Tom
~Nins~
> >
> > Whatta turd is the President! US troops all over the world and the
> > illegals are pouring across our southern border. Bush would suck a
> > dead skunk's pecker for a handful of votes, for that latino vote he is
> > willing to compromise the social and cultural future of America.
> >
> > Tom
>
> I agree the U.S. Government could and should put troops on the borders
> of the U.S..
I have mixed feelings about the military taking on the role of border
patrol. They are not cops, they are soldiers. Perhaps there is a viable
alternative? Perhaps they could build more installations/bases (small ones)
at different points relatively close to the borders (yes, it would be
costly)? This way, the mere presence of the military could provide the
needed deterrence and the military would not have to serve a function they
were not trained to serve and nothing would be violated. Is this what you
mean when you say the US should put troops on the borders?
>
> All that name calling isn't going to get it done.
>
> It only lowers your status as a credible poster.
True. Good advice/point, hope the person it is directed at considers it.
fl0w3r_w13l...@salmahayeksknockers.edu
> If they OR the more Evil Canadians are entering illegally, I don't have
> a problem with that.
For some reason, I don't think one sees many Canadians trying to smuggle
themselves into a "better life" in the US.
We're doing A-OK, thank you!
--
.............................................................................
The power of accurate observation is often called cynicism by those who have
not got it.
-George Bernard Shaw
.............................................................................
ds...@m3m3t1ccand1ru.com http://www.memeticcandiru.com
Sid Viscous
fl0w3r_w13ld1ng_$0ld...@salmahayeksknockers.edu wrote:
>In us.military.army AH#49 <"=?iso-8859-1?Q?Asshole=99=2349?="@your.net> wrote:
>
>> If they OR the more Evil Canadians are entering illegally, I don't have
>> a problem with that.
>
>For some reason, I don't think one sees many Canadians trying to smuggle
>themselves into a "better life" in the US.
Over twenty-one thousand left that socialist paradise for a better
life in the U.S. of A in 2000. 191,987 left between 1991 and 2000.
http://www.immigration.gov/graphics/shared/aboutus/statistics/IMM00yrbk/ExcIMM00/Table2.xls
Colin Campbell
fl0w3r_w13ld1ng_$0ld...@salmahayeksknockers.edu wrote:
>For some reason, I don't think one sees many Canadians trying to smuggle
>themselves into a "better life" in the US.
Actually, there is a very large number of Canadians living illegally
in the US. In fact there are more canadians in Los Angeles than in
any Canadian city.
"It's not American foreign policy, or the plight of the
Palestinians, or America's longstanding support for Israel.
A group of people with money and weaponry have simply
decided that we, as a civilization, are unfit to live, and
want, eventally, to exterminate us."
'Christian Century' magazine
gavnook
>>I agree the U.S. Government could and should put troops on the borders
>>of the U.S..
>
> And do what, fire on unarmed Mexicans families?
Oh, the poor Mexican invaders. <sniff>
But anyway, you detain them at gun point and put them on the bus back to
the border. Oh yeah, and quite often they are armed.
Morton Davis
"gavnook" <gavnook@ya_EYEh8SPAM_hoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns93A6D24A...@68.6.19.6...
I ho[e they catch you in a crossfire, fucktard.
-*MORT*-
gavnook
news:52LKa.25515$R73.4662@sccrnsc04:
>
> <Papp...@city.net> wrote in message
> news:3EFAEC84...@city.net...
>>
>>
>> Tom wrote:
>> >
>> > Whatta turd is the President! US troops all over the world and the
>> > illegals are pouring across our southern border. Bush would suck a
>> > dead skunk's pecker for a handful of votes, for that latino vote he
>> > is willing to compromise the social and cultural future of America.
>> >
>> > Tom
>>
>> I agree the U.S. Government could and should put troops on the
>> borders of the U.S..
>
> I have mixed feelings about the military taking on the role of border
> patrol. They are not cops, they are soldiers. Perhaps there is a
> viable alternative? Perhaps they could build more installations/bases
> (small ones) at different points relatively close to the borders (yes,
> it would be costly)? This way, the mere presence of the military
> could provide the needed deterrence and the military would not have to
> serve a function they were not trained to serve and nothing would be
> violated. Is this what you mean when you say the US should put troops
> on the borders?
Patroling a border is more of a military mission than a police action. We
think it's not their job because our military hasn't done anything on our
shores in over 100 years.
In the Army I was stationed at Fort Huachuca (pronounced WA-CHOO-KA), AZ
which is right on the Mexican border in Cochise county. Last I heard,
Cochise county was the #1 worst spot in the US for border crossings.
Rural property down there is practically worthless because of it. The
Army currently does nothing about it there, but the Border Patrol runs a
blimp on the post.
Hell, I'd re-enlist if I could get stationed down there to defend the
border. As it stands though, I have no desire go back in and end up
somewhere even hotter than where I currently live (Phoenix).
-gavnook
Michael Power
"gavnook" <gavnook@ya_EYEh8SPAM_hoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns93A6D24A...@68.6.19.6...
The smugglers who guide the illegals (and often abandon them) are armed and
ought to be shot. Mexican army units that cross the border and fire on our
Border Patrol officers ought to be on the ka-BOOM end of a Hellfire.
gavnook
$nG.3...@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net:
>> Oh, the poor Mexican invaders. <sniff>
>> But anyway, you detain them at gun point and put them on the bus back to
>> the border. Oh yeah, and quite often they are armed.
>
> I ho[e they catch you in a crossfire, fucktard.
>
> -*MORT*-
Mort! You're quickly becomming my hero. Just what exactly got you so upset?
What do you advocate if sending them back is not the answer?
I got it! Why don't we send the bus over there to pick them up! Then there
wouldn't be so many dead Mexicans out in the desert and in the backs of
trucks, and everyone would live happily ever after!
Have you no sense of security? Maybe you would if you lived where these
people do: http://www.ranchrescue.com./stories.htm
-gavnook
gavnook
news:bdgfcb$9dr$1...@bob.news.rcn.net:
>> Oh, the poor Mexican invaders. <sniff>
>> But anyway, you detain them at gun point and put them on the bus back
>> to the border. Oh yeah, and quite often they are armed.
>
> The smugglers who guide the illegals (and often abandon them) are
> armed and ought to be shot. Mexican army units that cross the border
> and fire on our Border Patrol officers ought to be on the ka-BOOM end
> of a Hellfire.
Can I get a "Hell YEAH!"?
I can't believe usenet has got me so pumped up.
-gavnook
karm1c...@salmahayeksknockers.edu
> Actually, there is a very large number of Canadians living illegally
> in the US. In fact there are more canadians in Los Angeles than in
> any Canadian city.
I challenge you to substantiate your claim.
--
.............................................................................
"The human rights organization Amnesty International said in a report in
December that Israel has made about 16,700 Palestinians homeless by
destroying at least 2,650 houses since 1987"
-Associated Press (04/23/2000)
.............................................................................
ds...@m3m3t1ccand1ru.com http://www.memeticcandiru.com
Colin Campbell
karm1c...@salmahayeksknockers.edu wrote:
>Colin Campbell <activa...@earthlink.net (remove underscore)> wrote:
>
>> Actually, there is a very large number of Canadians living illegally
>> in the US. In fact there are more canadians in Los Angeles than in
>> any Canadian city.
>
>I challenge you to substantiate your claim.
That's - mildly interesting. If you demonstrate how this conversation
is relevant to this newsgroup, I may be willing to even indulge you in
this.
Douglas Berry
Vandi...@hotmail.com (Tom) warmed at our fire and told this tale:
>Upon reflection, Americans would pay more for food to avoid their
>nation being flooded with third-world biocultural aliens.
Um, I'm Bicultural. English and Californian. and if you don't
believe me, then I suggest you call me next Guy Fawkes Day.
The last guy to suggest that Americans should be happy to pay more for
essentials is still running.
Douglas Berry
Viscous <viscous@fifty_weight.com> warmed at our fire and told this
tale:
>Over twenty-one thousand left that socialist paradise for a better
>life in the U.S. of A in 2000. 191,987 left between 1991 and 2000.
>http://www.immigration.gov/graphics/shared/aboutus/statistics/IMM00yrbk/ExcIMM00/Table2.xls
How many Americans went north?
Sid Viscous
<grid...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 23:44:07 GMT, a wanderer, known to us only as Sid
>Viscous <viscous@fifty_weight.com> warmed at our fire and told this
>tale:
>
>>Over twenty-one thousand left that socialist paradise for a better
>>life in the U.S. of A in 2000. 191,987 left between 1991 and 2000.
>>http://www.immigration.gov/graphics/shared/aboutus/statistics/IMM00yrbk/ExcIMM00/Table2.xls
>
>How many Americans went north?
What do I look like, Doug, the freakin' librarian?
It looks like in 2000 the number was 5,809.
http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/pdf/pub/facts2000.pdf
Daryl Hunt
"Sid Viscous" <viscous@fifty_weight.com> wrote in message
news:af8bd22c13c4eccd...@free.teranews.com...
You are being trolled.
Sid Viscous
It could be worse- I could be emigrating to Canada.
Douglas Berry
"Daryl Hunt" <dh...@i70west.nospam.net> warmed at our fire and told
this tale:
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/pdf/pub/facts2000.pdf
>
>You are being trolled.
No, I was curious about the number of Americans moving north. So I
asked..
Douglas Berry
>
>What do I look like, Doug, the freakin' librarian?
Well, when you tilt your head just a little to the right..
>It looks like in 2000 the number was 5,809.
>
>http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/pdf/pub/facts2000.pdf
Thanks.
l1nux...@salmahayeksknockers.edu
> That's - mildly interesting. If you demonstrate how this conversation
> is relevant to this newsgroup, I may be willing to even indulge you in
> this.
I shouldn't have to fullfill "conditions" in order to get you to
substanitate a claim. If you don't consider the claim relevant, then you
shouldn't have made it.
Personally, I think the claim made is BS. I've given you the chance to
prove otherwise, and you've failed.
--
.............................................................................
"The human rights group [Amnesty International] said Israel has arrested
more than 1,500 Palestinians in the past year, and that many of the
detainees were tortured"
-Laurie Copans, Associated Press, (28/08/2001)
.............................................................................
ds...@m3m3t1ccand1ru.com http://www.memeticcandiru.com
~Nins~
<l1nux...@salmahayeksknockers.edu> wrote in message
news:kdjLa.36947$T85.4...@news1.telusplanet.net...
> Colin Campbell <activa...@earthlink.net (remove underscore)> wrote:
>
> > That's - mildly interesting. If you demonstrate how this conversation
> > is relevant to this newsgroup, I may be willing to even indulge you in
> > this.
>
> I shouldn't have to fullfill "conditions" in order to get you to
> substanitate a claim. If you don't consider the claim relevant, then you
> shouldn't have made it.
>
> Personally, I think the claim made is BS. I've given you the chance to
> prove otherwise, and you've failed.
I think Colin knows what he's talking about. I took the liberty of doing a
bit of research on this and see below for some interesting info. Does Colin
really need to provide anything further to substantiate his claim that there
is a large number in LA and the US? He just stated "a large number" and he
didn't specify how many....below are the *estimated* numbers per INS. Keep
in mind that California is one of the states known to hold a large
percentage of illegal immigrants for the US.
http://www.immigration.gov/graphics/shared/aboutus/statistics/299.htm If
you go to this page, a table of stats from the INS for FY96, scroll down to
Illegal at the bottom of the page. Note 'Illegal Alien Population',
'Illegal Immigration', and then 'Aliens Apprehended'. You will notice that
Canada is/has been in the top 10, matter of fact they are number 4 in
illegal population w/n the US and immigration status in the US.
1996: Population: Canada: 120,000
Growth 92-96: Canada: 8,000
Apprehended: Canada: 3,160
Now, this was from a few years ago and am sure it has grown steadily over
the years. Notice the number difference between those in
population/immigration and those apprehended. Not many have been
apprehended. An illegal immigrant understandably would prefer a largely
populated areas (i.e., Los Angeles) as opposed to an area less populated to
where they might be caught more readily.
California is one of the states with largest numerical increases in the
1990s for unauthorized population. It was estimated that California has the
appx 32% of the national total of unauthorized population in January of
2000, that would be about 2.2 million. In Table B of the link I am
referencing from and for the 10-year period of 90-2000 Canada is in the top
15 for unauthorized population in the US. Now if I'm reading the table
correctly there has been an increase since 1990. 1990: 25,000....2000:
47,000...that's a growth of 22,000 (and this is an estimate) in a 10-year
period with California as previously noted carrying a third in percentage of
overall unauthorized population by illegal immigrants for the entire
USA..that is at least 2000 per year, and this is 2003.
http://www.immigration.gov/graphics/shared/aboutus/statistics/Ill_Report_1211.pdf
<Q>Quebec man arrested after cross-border fill-up released from Maine jail
Last Updated Fri, 15 Nov 2002 8:42:39
BANGOR, MAINE - The man who was arrested in October after zipping across the
border for gas was let out of jail in Maine on Thursday afternoon and is now
back home in Quebec.
http://www.cbc.ca/stories/2002/11/14/jalbert_michel021113 </Q>
Visa Waiver for Canadian Landed Immigrants Eliminated
http://www.usvisanews.com/memo2070.html
Waivers such as this one that has been done away with could have helped to
increase the size of illegal immigrants in the US.
<Q>INS estimates that the total undocumented population residing in the
United States was 7.0 million in January 2000. </Q>
http://www.immigration.gov/graphics/publicaffairs/summaries/undocres.htm
Colin Campbell
wrote:
>Colin Campbell <activa...@earthlink.net (remove underscore)> wrote:
>
>> That's - mildly interesting. If you demonstrate how this conversation
>> is relevant to this newsgroup, I may be willing to even indulge you in
>> this.
>
>I shouldn't have to fullfill "conditions" in order to get you to
>substanitate a claim. If you don't consider the claim relevant, then you
>shouldn't have made it.
>
>Personally, I think the claim made is BS. I've given you the chance to
>prove otherwise, and you've failed.
In that case I suggest that you punish me by not posting to
us.military.army
fl0w3r_w13l...@salmahayeksknockers.edu
None of this Substantiates Colin's proctonumerological claim that
"...there are more canadians in Los Angeles than in any Canadian city."
--
.............................................................................
"Arabs tend to confess; it's part of their nature"
- Moshe Etzioni, an Israeli high court justice,
on Israel's use of Torture in interrogation
.............................................................................
ds...@m3m3t1ccand1ru.com http://www.memeticcandiru.com
~Nins~
<fl0w3r_w13ld1ng_$0ld...@salmahayeksknockers.edu> wrote in message
news:zjKLa.38101$T85.4...@news1.telusplanet.net...
> ~Nins~ <nin...@mchsi.com> wrote:
>
<snip>
> None of this Substantiates Colin's proctonumerological claim that
> "...there are more canadians in Los Angeles than in any Canadian city."
Actually, it does, you just don't want to accept it. :) By the info I
provided it is reasonable to believe or state such.