Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Is it Possible to Apply Mathematics to Find Visual Patterns?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

MeAmI.org

unread,
Aug 14, 2009, 9:25:12 AM8/14/09
to
MMM scribed:

T.H. Ray wrote:
> Jack wrote:
>
> > On Aug 11, 2:53 am, "gratis-_+_8_Sum_"
> > <scribio_v...@mail.org> wrote:
> > > Simple try
> > >
> > > Truth like beauty need only be sometimes skin deep.
> > >
> > > Jack wrote:
> > > > It's fine. I'll admit I am still confused as to
> > how that was supposed
> > > > to let me know how to derive one set of rules
> > from an infinite list of
> > > > possibilities. Sure, I can claim a principle to
> > be valid once tested
> > > > on the given, but I do not know how to work
> > backwards effectively in
> > > > such a way as to find rules that truly hold given
> > the valid conditions
> > > > for this particular scenario without a
> > ridiculously intense process of
> > > > trial and error. My entire point in creating this
> > post was to find
> > > > some sort of superior methodology and surpass the
> > rigors of numerous
> > > > processes, but I've had no such fortune.
> > >
> > > Start with this:
> > >
> > > Any rule which contradicts A~>B is invalid no
> > matter C.
> >
> > Yet I do not even know where to start. There is not
> > even a constant
> > rate of decrease in the number of circles or x's, nor
> > a rate of
> > increase for the blank tiles. There is no parallel in
> > the way each row
> > or column alone changes from what I can detect. I
> > cannot tell whether
> > or not each item in the set acts independently of
> > another. The only
> > thing I can really tell you for sure based on the
> > change from A to B
> > is that there are less circles and x's than before
> > and more blank
> > tiles. Sure, I can see where the changes occur, but
> > when comparing B
> > to C, it seems completely different than the change
> > from A to B, and
> > no set of rules comes to mind which are capable of
> > predicting the
> > change from B to C based on A to B.
>
> You're wrong about the rate of decrease. It is constant
> both for Os and Xs.
>
> Os decrease in the pattern 2, 4, 6 ...
>
> Xs decrease in the pattern 1, 3, 5 ...
>
> accounting for the differential between the numbers of
> figures. So the final square should have no Os and 1 X.
>
> Where should the X be in the square? :-)
>
> Tom
X should be where it is when it is where it is.

144 Theorem

Οτι γυρναει, επιστρεφει Δουλεψε, λοιπον, σαν να μην εχεις αναγκη απο
χρηματα.Αγαπησε, σαν να μη φοβασε οτι θα πονεσεις.Χορεψε, σαν να μη σε
βλεπει κανεις.Τραγουδα, σαν να μη σ' ακουει κανεις.Ζησε, σαν να ειναι
η Γη ο Παραδεισος

That it turns, it returns It worked, therefore, as if you don't have
need from [cremate].[Agapes], as if not [vibes] that [pansies].
[Chirps], as if it doesn't see you [Keats].[Tragedy], as if not [s]'
it hears [Keats].[Rise], as if they is the Ground the Paradise.

Martin Musatov

AP Lead for MeAmI.org

unread,
Sep 20, 2009, 9:16:29 AM9/20/09
to
> Martin Musatov- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Again I, Musatov, your humble narrator, do state the case in perfect
open ... Three times the same to Jesus have you and He Greater than I
comes... more » ... Is it Possible to Apply Mathematics to Find Visual
Patterns? ...
groups.google.com/group/us.arts

0 new messages