Being an employee, I'm afraid that I'll have to disagree with you on the
opinion that Bluehost is retarded BJ.
Deploying a Ruby on Rails application on Bluehost is actually quite
straight forward. You simply have to deploy it to run through
fcgid instead of the typical Webserver proxy/Mongrel approach. Granted,
running apps through fcgid is not ideal for Rails apps while
in development mode, but functions well enough for apps that are in
production mode.
With the ability to install and manage your own gems locally, freeze
applications, and basically install virtually anything you want from the
command line I really don't see how you are making a valid point.
I will admit that shared hosting is not for everybody and Bluehost does
not put a lot of emphasis on Rails hosting since there are a lot of
companies out there that specialize in it, but most of the problems that
I see are user based and not server side.
--Erick
Sure. I didn't want to go into the whole discussion of why BlueHost
has been "retarded" for me since that wasn't what the thread was
about. It was a vague slam, so sorry on that bit. What I meant was
that the deployment was not as "straight forward" as you suggest,
since I'm still not up and running after spending several hours
getting things to work on saturday. This deployment would have been
done in 5 minutes on my Slicehost box. I was just adding to the thread
that I wouldn't go with BlueHost due to my issues.
> I will admit that shared hosting is not for everybody and Bluehost
> does
> not put a lot of emphasis on Rails hosting since there are a lot of
> companies out there that specialize in it,
Agreed. Were it my decision, we wouldn't be on BlueHost, but it's not
as I'm just helping a friend out with his fledgling company.
BJ
Here are some capistrano tasks, from our very own JohnnyT, that can set
up a slicehost slice in a few minutes... can't get much easier than that. :)
http://github.com/johnnyt/strano
-Ben
I use linode with a 32-bit OS for production--I can run several rails
instances there without running out of RAM.
I currently host a rails app on BlueHost, and one on linode.
Bluehost's tech support has been kind recently but traditionally
they've blown off support requests. Also they once switched ruby
versions on me *without notifying* and then again later with a new
rails version--no notification, site went down until customer
complained to me. Powerful servers though, and unlimited bandwidth
which is nice.
I would note that once my account was disabled because I was running
an svn process that was "using too many resources" -- and all I was
doing was an svn export of the ruby tree. That was surprising.
-r
What problems can occur because of it being unmanaged? Isn't
linode/slicehost also "unmanaged"? How has your experience been? They
look cheap...
-r
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Utah Ruby Users Group
ur...@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/urug/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---