And if you're having any trouble accessing the forums: Registration is tied to having a USA

The committee discussed it and agreed on the interpretation of the current rule: II.O.2 applies and

Assuming it wasn't dangerous, and that the catch was made prior to the contact, it sounds like no

I'm having a hard time actually picturing this example. What I mean is, if I, as a thrower about

How about if you include the proper number combined with the word up, such as upfour, so that the

Hey, I'm putting together an explanation of the rules on disc space (for a 'rule of the week

XVI.J. states, in part, "[...] The thrower must establish a pivot at the appropriate spot on the

Sorry Darrin, that was a mistake on my part, that scenario isn't at the beginning of this thread,

Yes, Thanks, Jon! I had never picked up on the fact that the "thrower" stays the thrower,

Howdy Alan, cool deal on the OCR.... I'll talk to TK, Tom Kennedy, & see if he has those

Hi Mark, thanks for responding. The fact that it would also be effective in aiding the throwers team

Hi Jon, I'm new to the web, so not sure about protocol, sorry. I didn't believe there was any

pacemaker nailed it. If it was as you described it was clearly an offensive (blocking) foul, no foul

Howdy Mark, Thank you so much for responding back this quickly! I really appreciate it. No, since TK

Yes, mostly agreed, although I don't care if the defender got his feet stationary or not, if that

> > Situation: > > Thrower sets up with pivot foot at front corner of endzone. Marker

In complete agreement with Mark below. Just a follow-up on Chris's point. For an infraction that

As promised, some closure: In this situation, the disc was intentionally advanced (upward), so it is

The original post seemed do describe gripping to me (it's always hard to say without actually

Despite the name, as far as I know there's nothing preventing poutine-lovers from joining USAU (

I'm pretty much in agreement with Jon here and especially in agreement on the very strict

(1) Team O now has possession. Because the disc was purposefully dropped, it is a turnover by the

Just to be clear, in this hypothetical, did the player ever come to a stop? This sounds like someone

Apologies for the inconsistent text. You can ignore " If the disc was uncatchable anyways (to be

Being a rules board, I thought you might like to hear about a new iPhone app with search-able 11th

What fun is a greatest with no risk of turnover? Seriously though, the question is whether putting a

If an observer is 90% certain (our standard for making a ruling) that the foul occurred before the

Hey Crotty, how's Iowa? Personally I'd be in favor of everyone always counting the pre-stalls

My bad, Steve. I retracted my "Wonged again". I suppose it should be "Wanged again

Sorry, another question -- I thought this rule was fairly self- explanatory, but I was confused by