Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Endogenous versus Exogenous Money
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  4 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Joe Leote  
View profile  
 More options May 4 2012, 8:38 pm
From: Joe Leote <tech_advi...@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 20:38:43 -0400
Local: Fri, May 4 2012 8:38 pm
Subject: Endogenous versus Exogenous Money
This is a short essay covering much information about the debate over
Endo/Exo -genous money:

http://cas.umkc.edu/econ/economics/faculty/wray/papers/Desai.pdf

one item of note is the idea that Treasury securities provide a type of
"endogenous" liquidity that renders Fed control over the monetary base
less effective as an "exogenous" factor. Very good discussion of money
as unique to an economic context.

Joe


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Joe Leote  
View profile  
 More options May 4 2012, 10:20 pm
From: Joe Leote <tech_advi...@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 22:20:03 -0400
Local: Fri, May 4 2012 10:20 pm
Subject: Re: Endogenous versus Exogenous Money
Padagogical Approaches to Theories of Endogenous versus Exogenous Money
http://www.boeckler.de/pdf/v_2008_10_31_kinsella.pdf

This paper compares the treatment of money in post graduate
macro-economic textbook models, one conventional and the other stock
flow consistent model. Excellent discussion of core ideas.

Joe

On 5/4/2012 8:38 PM, Joe Leote wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
John Hermann  
View profile  
 More options May 4 2012, 10:50 pm
From: John Hermann <herm...@picknowl.com.au>
Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 12:20:41 +0930
Local: Fri, May 4 2012 10:50 pm
Subject: Re: Endogenous versus Exogenous Money

Thanks Joe.

It may be argued that the processes of the government selling sovereign
bonds to the private sector, and their subsequent purchase from the
private sector by the central bank, are the equivalent (putting aside
the issue of the flow of interest) of the government selling those bonds
directly to the central bank, thereby enabling it to introduce newly
created money into the economy -- as required for its healthy
development.  On this basis it has been argued that it is not really
necessary to have the government going to the trouble of manufacturing
bonds at all.  Thus the central bank would simply create base money
according to the economy's perceived needs, in collaboration with
Treasury.  This is the pure exogenous route -- with all its attendant
potential dangers.

If one prefers the endogenous route (which is my position), then one
needs to devise a mechanism for implementing it.  And at present the
universally accepted mechanism is open market operations (buying and
selling sovereign securities, in order to manipulate interest rates in
such a manner as to keep inflation within certain agreed bounds).  If
anyone can think of a better mechanism for implementing an endogenously
driven banking system, I would be very interested to learn how it operates.

John Hermann

On 5/05/2012 10:08 AM, Joe Leote wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jean Erick  
View profile  
 More options May 6 2012, 12:43 pm
From: "Jean Erick" <jeaner...@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 09:43:02 -0700
Local: Sun, May 6 2012 12:43 pm
Subject: Re: Endogenous versus Exogenous Money

     Add a tier exponent to all money accounts.  The tier number would increase everytime the money was loaned.  Interpolate for partials.  Lower numbers equal
call priority.
     The problem of money has been its secrecy.  This idea identifies money as to it's characteristic, not its owner.
 Market risk analysis would take care of the issue.  This is a mechanism which would allow an entirely free market based approach to work.
     The main problem has always been increasing debt.  This is the first time it would be quantified and subject to the restrictions inhearant in market risk analysis.
Nobody would like it.  It would subjugate everybody to the reality of the risk analysis of the market.  It would force a smoothly funtional system on everybody.

James


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »