[UML Forum] structured vs object oriented analysis and design

[Motaz K. Saad]

Hello,

I am preparing a presentation about "structured vs object oriented
analysis and design"

it is available at:

http://www.slideshare.net/mksaad/structure-vs-object-oriented-analysis-and-design



I would appreciate your comments,
Thank You,
--
Motaz K. Saad

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "UML Forum" group.
To post to this group, send email to umlf...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to umlforum+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/umlforum?hl=en.

[RJB]

Not bad!
The collaboration/communication diagram is UML1.? not UML2.

And I don't see any use cases! Just bubbles in a use case diagram. A
use case is a textual artifact.

I disagree with conclusions. The to techniques are complementary not
competitors.
SAD is more about how the enterprise works but
OOAD is focussed on the software components in the enterprise.

Example: SAD helps you choose hardware. OOAD assumes you've got it
already!

IMHO.

On May 13, 3:35 am, "Motaz K. Saad" <motaz.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am preparing a presentation about "structured vs object oriented
> analysis and design"
>
> it is available at:
>

> http://www.slideshare.net/mksaad/structure-vs-object-oriented-analysi...

[Motaz K. Saad]

Thanks for your comments.

would you explain what do you mean by "Just bubbles in a use case diagram. A use case is a textual artifact."

SAD and OOAD are not competitors. But I have to choose which one is more suitable for my project. I think I cannot use both for a given project? (correct me if I am wrong)

Regards,
--
Motaz K. Saad