Received: by 10.229.191.137 with SMTP id dm9mr2922982qcb.17.1286397068710;
        Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: ul-developers@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.229.19.84 with SMTP id z20ls2924739qca.2.p; Wed, 06 Oct 2010
 13:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.192.137 with SMTP id dq9mr2993841qcb.14.1286397067984;
        Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.192.137 with SMTP id dq9mr2993840qcb.14.1286397067942;
        Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <jmiah...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-vw0-f49.google.com (mail-vw0-f49.google.com [209.85.212.49])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id m5si180873qcu.0.2010.10.06.13.31.06;
        Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jmiah...@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.49 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.49;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jmiah...@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.49 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jmiah...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by vws11 with SMTP id 11so222046vws.22
        for <ul-developers@googlegroups.com>; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=gB/1+63P09Upa0mz9gCmHllb7GGf+MS0iKR0YwIy6N8=;
        b=LLTmi9JYr2E1ud4Ok23qSH5ZUZf9tqhaSFf+KO5enUclB0V2+yixKM6unrPIec7PVO
         uqLfVXfCo5+r1H1ByEGmmg+eTHMxoEIn84NXO1fuqdsAtdATZkubns2ZxBfgqpjQXOQz
         BlVHEt4KebCZUjHCJ2W/UGB6jd0cJZlgs9U5g=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=LYMLDxwC26eUKh8f3CqO+p59S9jp41ypwsWFFqn9Mx012X7rUqBnmAoaRdOwftmP9A
         leAxWeUBRtd2D5ehOYDyN2nWlRbgWYQ/p7RBzPwVmOuoEy4ejtkyLhB5aSgLvqmwWBLc
         R8m/u77tbG3l8J/PfojfN3cGjvGcjKNgWMTv0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.216.16 with SMTP id hg16mr9081762qcb.55.1286397066648;
 Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.74.20 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 13:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikjZmZ5EvU9yJ-nDfi=CbfV6xxXkxaW_ddMh...@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimYCR3vdfACodNu=cgtFVkeb+nYdvJNDx_O4...@mail.gmail.com>
	<4cab1f64.c706df0a.6423.7...@mx.google.com>
	<AANLkTimNP3m5Fnkif+1re9SzA1LkymhbN=UOLomd-...@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikjZmZ5EvU9yJ-nDfi=CbfV6xxXkxaW_ddMh...@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 13:31:06 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTim8ARF+-WyLWEVkfexZRgntZJPtMdJRgCte0...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ul-developers] poppler
From: Jeremiah Summers <jmiah...@gmail.com>
To: ul-developers@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Gianvacca <gianva...@unity-linux.org> wrote:
> Jeremiah,
>
> I honestly don't see any reason why even qt4 should reside in KDE channel.
> The equation qt=KDE is simply not true.
> I would fit there only packages that require kdelibs, but in the end I don't
> really mind.

Quite frankly it's in the KDE 4 channel because I maintain it and
pretty much all the Qt4 packages and I like them to all be in one
place, so yes QT4=KDE because I maintain both and heavily. I hate how
there is no organization in Unity SVN. It makes its hard to sort
through and track packages that are based on Qt4 and when a version of
Qt4 changes if the Qt based packages are in the KDE 4 channel they get
updated if they're not than it's up to the person that packaged them
to track the new Qt4 release and beings there's maybe a handful of
packagers here and not many do or wanted to do KDE/Qt4 packages than
my guess would be it would go unnoticed until someone reported the
package as broke. Also I don't know of any other set of 1000+ packages
that depend on it, as opposed to the maybe 10 that aren't KDE centric
that we have in the repos that pull it. Those packages are in main
however, to my knowledge no other DE pulls in Qt4 only KDE. So it wins
out.