Hi
Personally I don't know of a 100% reliable method
of tracking a payload - but the most reliable method is a radio
tracker IMO. The main advantage of the radio trackers are
continual updates on position and predicted flight path.
I don't know of any off the shelf system (Spot, InReach or
GSM tracker) that does that. I'm not really opposed to
them - I just don't think there is a better method than
a radio tracker. In fact when I fly expensive kit for other
people I always go for a radio tracker and a GSM tracker.
The most commonly available GSM trackers use the
SiRFIII GPS chipset -
which is known to pack up above 60K ft.
Some trackers get very confused by this and won't report their
position on descent. They tend to recover well after the payload
has landed. If it then lands upside down on the ground or in a hollow
or ditch with no mobile coverage - you have had it. I have certainly
had flights in the UK carrying a GSM tracker where the only way I
have found it has been the radio tracker. On the other hand I know
of flights where the reverse was true due to dodgy hardware or code.
Having said that I would say that you stand a bit better than
50% chance of locating the payload with a GSM tacker alone.
I haven't tried a GTU10 - I have tried a TK102 (SiRFIII based as above)
I believe the Loc8tor GSM device was used successfully
on
one flight.
The other reason I'm in favour of making your own radio tracker
is that it drives people toward UKHAS - where they can get lots of
help, guidance and encouragement from people experienced
in HABing.
I personally hope that no-one ever offers a ready made solution
so that anyone can put one together without finding out about all
the other aspects (e.g. safety, regulatory).
Just a personal opinion.
Steve G8KHW