http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/telecoms/article7099128.ece
Orange deal with BT stirs up fight for broadband supremacy
Orange has opened up a new front in the fight for broadband customers
after abandoning its fixed-line network and cutting a deal with BT to
offer better high-speed internet.
BT will take over Orange’s fixed-line infrastructure and integrate it
into its network, which should vastly improve the experience for
Orange’s 840,000 broadband customers
"Allan" <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:82qnfh...@mid.individual.net...
I noted this last para.
"The decision to pass its network to BT mirrors a similarly dramatic move
last year by Kingston Communications, the Hull-based fixed-line telecoms
company now trading as KCOM. It handed over its network to BT and signed a
wholesale deal to get national coverage and reduce its costs substantially.
"
I have read here in the past that people in Hull could only have BB with the
Hull company does this mean they now have same choices/prices as rest of us?
I have always felt sorry for those living in Hull.
Regards
David
Bugger! I've just moved from a BT landline to Orange to get away from
BT's endless sales calls and from TalkTalk (who took over Freedom2Surf)
to Orange broadband, just to get away from TalkTalk.
I'm saving money but I'm now stuck for another 16 months.
Another Dave
George
Openreach is a tight profitable little company, kept that way by OfCom.
BT Retail ought to be hung out to dry and sold off.
Really?
Most people i know on BT says it's one of the most over priced and poorest
services out. There was some thing in the news recently about BT giving the
poorest broad band speeds per package than any one else, i believe some
people on 10Mb or more were only getting a little over 1Mb. So here we have
one of the cheapest broad band providers (due mainly to the input from
advertising revenue as can be seen on there website pages and through what
seems to be their sellling of your email addresses to certain marketing
companies) but who provide a fairy reasonable service apart from the spam
involved, joining up with one of the most expensive but poorest service
providers.
I can't see anything good coming out of that other than a growing monopoly
which could end up making every ones services poorer and/or more costly.
George
>Most people i know on BT says it's one of the most over priced and poorest
>services out.
They should stop whinging and vote with their feet... and wallet.
>There was some thing in the news recently about BT giving the
>poorest broad band speeds per package than any one else, i believe some
>people on 10Mb or more were only getting a little over 1Mb.
I wonder why it has more subscribers than any other UK Internet
provider?
See <http://www.ispreview.co.uk/review/top10.php> and
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BT_Total_Broadband>.
--
Martin Jay
Back the Ban: <http://www.backtheban.com/>
League Against Cruel Sports: <http://www.league.org.uk/>
Ahh, i think i get it now, you mean that the o/p was regarding BT
Wholesale/Openreach (the network).
These things can get confusing!
(something)
Naughty, naughty, very naughty..................
> BT will take over Orange’s fixed-line infrastructure and integrate it
> into its network, which should vastly improve the experience for
> Orange’s 840,000 broadband customers
This is pretty embarrassing for a subsidiary of a national incumbent
telco like Orange. You would think surely France Telecom have the
necessary expertise to make this sort of stuff work. On the other hand,
perhaps we're the last country in Europe stuck on ADSL so they've given
up ;-)
Maybe they decided if BT are going to roll out FTTC, LLU is going to be
obsolete within a couple of years anyway so might as not waste the money
on it.
--
<http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) (UnSoEs...@ale.cx)
09:32:16 up 7 days, 22:45, 2 users, load average: 0.13, 0.21, 0.18
It is better to have been wasted and then sober
than to never have been wasted at all
Who says TV commercials don't work
BT, experts on separating idiots from their money
Steve Terry
--
Get a free Three 3pay Sim with £2 bonus after £10 top up
http://freeagent.three.co.uk/stand/view/id/5276
It's all subjective though isn't it? Back in 1995/96 or whenever it was, I
was a beta tester for the ISP BT Internet, using either a 9.6 or 14.4kbps
dial-up modem (can't remember which). As soon as our exchange was ADSL
enabled in 2003, I got it a few days later. In the last 15 years, I've had
just two "internet" faults, one on dial-up and one on broadband, and they
were both dealt with quickly and efficiently.
If you want to go back further than that, we've had our actual phone line
since 1969 and only ever had one fault on that too (that was in 1972 - I
remember because it was the week of Preston Guild). So for me, yes, BT _are_
the best and I wouldn't dream of going elsewhere. I'll admit that they
aren't as cheap as they could be but that's my only gripe.
Its not the Openreach bit one objects to. Its the sales, support and
marketing layer of BT retail.
Which I have circumvented by going with IDnet. What I pay extra on
broadband I save on phone line and call charges.
As I keep repeating, BT is not one monolithic company any more. Bits of
it are good. Bits of it are appallingly bad.
Who was the BT CEO who in 2000 said Broadband was only for Nerds
How many faults did you here about on other providers in that period?
Not just BT, but any 'Brand'. People like them because it makes them
feel like a safe choice...
I'm the complete opposite. I have an innate distrust of brands.
will it offer any improvement to customers on Orange who are not on an
LLU exchange?