Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion TOT Conundrum - Kettles
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Alan  
View profile  
 More options Apr 20 2007, 1:53 pm
Newsgroups: uk.tech.digital-tv
From: Alan <junk_re...@amac.f2s.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:53:33 +0100
Local: Fri, Apr 20 2007 1:53 pm
Subject: Re: TOT Conundrum - Kettles
In message <4628d022$0$514$bed64...@news.gradwell.net>,
tinn...@isbd.co.uk wrote

>Java Jive <j...@evij.com> wrote:

>> Russell Hobbs:    Model 3161-40, 2.5-3.0kW, concealed element, newest model,
>> probably a little over 5 years old
>> Morphy Richards:    Model 24343, 1850-2200W, exposed element, older model,
>> probably nearly 15 years old

>I think that may be the clue - concealed element versus exposed
>element.  The exposed element probably loses less heat to the outside
>world than the concealed element does.

One element may have been 'printed' as a method of manufacture and be
purely resistive and the other element may be wound (a coil) and be
inductive. How did you measure the power?
--
Alan
news2006 {at} amac {dot} f2s {dot} com

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google