Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

if it ain't scottish, its crap!

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Jason Ryder

unread,
Apr 27, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/27/99
to
Remember that! Rangers rule :0)

Roker

unread,
Apr 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/28/99
to
Sadly, only in Scotland. In England I'm sure they'd do well.......
In the first division!
Jason Ryder wrote in message <372674...@vt.edu>...
>Remember that! Rangers rule :0)

Jon Mills

unread,
Apr 29, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/29/99
to
In article <372674...@vt.edu>, Jason Ryder <jry...@vt.edu> writes

>Remember that! Rangers rule :0)

You obviously dont follow know team do you?
Sweaty twat.

Ron Healy

unread,
Apr 29, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/29/99
to

Jason Ryder wrote in message <372674...@vt.edu>...
>Remember that! Rangers rule :0)


what you meant was

"Remember that! (Queens Park) Rangers rule :0)"

Roker

unread,
Apr 30, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/30/99
to
I really don't think that he meant that at all. Oh dear.....
Ron Healy wrote in message ...

Peter McLaughlin

unread,
May 2, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/2/99
to
In article <quEW2.607$yr2...@news.indigo.ie>, Ron Healy
<heal...@esatclear.ie> writes
>
>
>
>>>Jason Ryder wrote

>>>>Remember that! Rangers rule :0)
>
>>Ron Healy wrote in message
>>>what you meant was
>>>"Remember that! (Queens Park) Rangers rule :0)"
>
>
>Roker wrote

>>I really don't think that he meant that at all. Oh dear.....
>
>
>
>Of course he did. He just didn't realise it...
>
The original post was a masterpiece and was constructed in such a manner
that nobody knows what the author meant, far less him.

Is this Dadaism making its presence felt on UK.S.F or are we dealing
with a complete fuckwit?

I don't care either way, it's surreal enough for me :-)
--
Peter McLaughlin

Ron Healy

unread,
May 2, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/2/99
to

Peter McLaughlin wrote

>Is this Dadaism making its presence felt on UK.S.F or are we dealing
>with a complete fuckwit?

>I don't care either way, it's surreal enough for me :-)


Dadaism and Surrealism in the same post? We should be on
uk.arty-farty.ponces discussing this....

BTW I love Dali's surrealistic efforts, especially the melted watches - so
representative of the qualities of time itself, don't you think? Where's the
cheese and biscuits?

stuart graham

unread,
May 3, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/3/99
to
On Sun, 2 May 1999 15:58:03 +0100, "Ron Healy" <heal...@esatclear.ie>
wrote:

Of course Dali wasnt a *true* surrealist since he was chucked out of
the movement for spending too much time on his paintings rather than
drawing automatically from dreams...
--
stuart graham
http://home.clara.net/stuartg/
The alternate suggestion:
Vote SNP.

Ron Healy

unread,
May 4, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/4/99
to

stuart graham wrote

"Ron Healy" wrote:

>>Peter McLaughlin wrote

>>>Is this Dadaism making its presence felt on UK.S.F or are we dealing with
a complete fuckwit?

>>>I don't care either way, it's surreal enough for me :-)

>>Dadaism and Surrealism in the same post? We should be on
>>uk.arty-farty.ponces discussing this....
>>BTW I love Dali's surrealistic efforts, especially the melted watches - so
representative of the qualities of time itself, don't you think? Where's the
cheese and biscuits?

>Of course Dali wasnt a *true* surrealist since he was chucked out of
>the movement for spending too much time on his paintings rather than
>drawing automatically from dreams...


But the reason why he was a surrealist of the utmost ability was because he
*was* painting subconsciously while all the other 'surrealist' painters only
*thought* they were asleep when in fact they were awake. When they were
*actually* asleep (and painting) they were really only part of Dali's dream
landscape.

Besides, I like the look of them. And the Cubists didn't only use cubes, so
there... ;0j

stuart graham

unread,
May 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/5/99
to
On Tue, 4 May 1999 21:16:53 +0100, "Ron Healy" <heal...@esatclear.ie>
wrote:


>>Of course Dali wasnt a *true* surrealist since he was chucked out of
>>the movement for spending too much time on his paintings rather than
>>drawing automatically from dreams...
>
>
>
>
>But the reason why he was a surrealist of the utmost ability was because he
>*was* painting subconsciously while all the other 'surrealist' painters only
>*thought* they were asleep when in fact they were awake. When they were
>*actually* asleep (and painting) they were really only part of Dali's dream
>landscape.

Dali was a charlatan who had read a bit of Freud. A brilliant
draughtsman but really just a showman at the end of the day.

>
>Besides, I like the look of them. And the Cubists didn't only use cubes, so
>there... ;0j
>

Doh! Interestingly Picasso was also a surrealist at one point, though
I beleive he got chucked out for being a member of the communist
party.

Ronnie the Tim

unread,
May 6, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/6/99
to
In article <37318d0...@news.clara.net>, stuart graham
<stu...@clara.net> writes

Nah, he was chucked out the Surrealist movement for doing homers;
Artexing Miro's living room ceiling IIRC.
--
Ronnie the Tim

Robert Poleson

unread,
May 6, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/6/99
to
On Wed, 05 May 1999 18:41:50 GMT, stuart graham wrote...

>
>Doh! Interestingly Picasso was also a surrealist at one point, though
>I beleive he got chucked out for being a member of the communist
>party.
>
How, exactly, does one get thrown out of being surreal? Do you mean
they actually had an official group of artists who decided whether or
not you were allowed to paint a certain type of picture?
--
Robert Poleson
email: rob at rjp.clara.net

Doc Gonz0

unread,
May 6, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/6/99
to
On Thu, 06 May 1999 12:49:26 GMT, s...@m.no (Robert Poleson) wrote:

>On Wed, 05 May 1999 18:41:50 GMT, stuart graham wrote...
>>
>>Doh! Interestingly Picasso was also a surrealist at one point, though
>>I beleive he got chucked out for being a member of the communist
>>party.
>>
>How, exactly, does one get thrown out of being surreal? Do you mean
>they actually had an official group of artists who decided whether or
>not you were allowed to paint a certain type of picture?

They just took his lobster away.

HTH.
--
The Doctor.
West Ham United F.C. Aprilia RS125.
The Doctor prescribes:
Bill Hicks: Rant in E Minor.

Ron Healy

unread,
May 6, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/6/99
to

Doc Gonz0 wrote

>>>Doh! Interestingly Picasso was also a surrealist at one point, though

>>>I beleive he got chucked out...


>>How, exactly, does one get thrown out of being surreal? Do you mean they
actually had an official group of artists who decided whether or not you
were allowed to paint a certain type of picture?

>They just took his lobster away.

That's what they used to do. Of course, in these days of modern technology
they just ask a duck.

Ron Healy

unread,
May 6, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/6/99
to

stuart graham wrote

>>>Of course Dali wasnt a *true* surrealist since he was chucked out of
>>>the movement for spending too much time on his paintings rather >>>than
drawing automatically from dreams...


>>But the reason why he was a surrealist of the utmost ability was because
he *was* painting subconsciously while all the other 'surrealist' painters
only *thought* they were asleep when in fact they were awake. When they were
*actually* asleep (and painting) they were really only part of Dali's dream
landscape.


>Dali was a charlatan who had read a bit of Freud.


You mean he was a qualified Psychiatrist, too?

>A brilliant
>draughtsman but really just a showman at the end of the day.

Thank you. Oh, sorry - you meant Dali?


>>Besides, I like the look of them. And the Cubists didn't only use cubes,
so there... ;0j

>Doh! Interestingly Picasso was also a surrealist at one point, though

>I beleive he got chucked out for being a member of the communist
>party.

So he was the ultimate surrealist? He even believed in a surreal world and
surreal politics? By the way, Dali *was* painting from the unconscious most
of the time if you count drunken stupor as unconscious ;0)

Alasdair Allan

unread,
May 7, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/7/99
to
Robert Poleson <s...@m.no> wrote

> On Wed, 05 May 1999 18:41:50 GMT, stuart graham wrote...
> >
> >Doh! Interestingly Picasso was also a surrealist at one point, though
> >I beleive he got chucked out for being a member of the communist
> >party.
> >
> How, exactly, does one get thrown out of being surreal?

Timing.

--
Alasdair Allan, Ibrox, Glasgow |England - Country where Marx developed
x-st...@null.net | the basis of Communism
X-Static's Rangers Webzine |Scotland - Country where Smith developed
http://www.x-static.demon.co.uk/ | the basis of Capitalism

Robert Poleson

unread,
May 7, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/7/99
to
On Thu, 6 May 1999 20:35:43 +0100, Ron Healy wrote...
>
>Doc Gonz0 wrote

>
>>>>Doh! Interestingly Picasso was also a surrealist at one point, though
>>>>I beleive he got chucked out...
>
>
>>>How, exactly, does one get thrown out of being surreal? Do you mean they
>actually had an official group of artists who decided whether or not you
>were allowed to paint a certain type of picture?
>
>
>
>>They just took his lobster away.
>
>
>
>That's what they used to do. Of course, in these days of modern technology
>they just ask a duck.
>
>
>
I didn't pluck my bicycle just so you could have monkfish tails.

--
Robert Poleson
email: rob at rjp.clara.net
This Post's Top Tip:
Optrex.

Ron Healy

unread,
May 8, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/8/99
to

Robert Poleson wrote in message ...

>>Ron Healy wrote...

>>Doc Gonz0 wrote

>>Doh! Interestingly Picasso was also a surrealist at one point, though
>>I beleive he got chucked out...


>>>>How, exactly, does one get thrown out of being surreal? Do you mean they
actually had an official group of artists who decided whether or not you
were allowed to paint a certain type of picture?


>>>They just took his lobster away.


>>That's what they used to do. Of course, in these days of modern technology
they just ask a duck.


>I didn't pluck my bicycle just so you could have monkfish tails.

Which raises the obvious question: Are we here because the Monkfish wanted
it, or is the Monkfish here at our behest? Furthermore, Monkfish and bicycle
in the same sentence leads to the obvious comparison to the old saying "I
need that like a monkfish needs a P45"

Doc Gonz0

unread,
May 8, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/8/99
to
On Sat, 8 May 1999 14:55:51 +0100, "Ron Healy" <heal...@esatclear.ie>
wrote:

>

A bit thundery later...


--
The Doctor.
West Ham United F.C. Aprilia RS125.
The Doctor prescribes:

Dunlop Sportmax III D207GP tyres.

StephenC

unread,
May 9, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/9/99
to

Doc Gonz0 wrote ...

>"Ron Healy" wrote:
>
>>
>>Robert Poleson wrote in message ...
>>
>>>>Ron Healy wrote...
>>
>>>>Doc Gonz0 wrote
>>
>>>>Doh! Interestingly Picasso was also a surrealist at one point, though
>>>>I beleive he got chucked out...
>>
>>
>>>>>>How, exactly, does one get thrown out of being surreal? Do you mean
they
>>actually had an official group of artists who decided whether or not you
>>were allowed to paint a certain type of picture?
>>
>>
>>>>>They just took his lobster away.
>>
>>
>>>>That's what they used to do. Of course, in these days of modern
technology
>>they just ask a duck.
>>
>>
>>>I didn't pluck my bicycle just so you could have monkfish tails.
>>
>>
>>
>>Which raises the obvious question: Are we here because the Monkfish wanted
>>it, or is the Monkfish here at our behest? Furthermore, Monkfish and
bicycle
>>in the same sentence leads to the obvious comparison to the old saying "I
>>need that like a monkfish needs a P45"
>>
>A bit thundery later...


I wish that you and that giraffe would stop eating my carpet.
--
Today's recommendation:
Don't get talking to an ugly girl - you'll regret it later
Goan the Hoops
Stephen

Doc Gonz0

unread,
May 9, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/9/99
to

Here, accept this photograph of a gold ingot as compensation.


--
The Doctor.
West Ham United F.C. Aprilia RS125.
The Doctor prescribes:

Absinth (Yes I know it's been done before, but I can't reccomend it highly enough)

Ron Healy

unread,
May 9, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/9/99
to

Doc Gonz0 wrote

"StephenC" wrote:
>>Doc Gonz0 wrote ...
>>>"Ron Healy" wrote:
>>>>Robert Poleson wrote in message ...
>>>>>>Ron Healy wrote...
>>>>>>Doc Gonz0 wrote

>>>>>>Doh! Interestingly Picasso was also a surrealist at one point, though
I beleive he got chucked out...

>>How, exactly, does one get thrown out of being surreal? Do you >>mean they
actually had an official group of artists who decided >>whether or not you
were allowed to paint a certain type of picture?

>>>>>>>They just took his lobster away.

>>>>>>That's what they used to do. Of course, in these days of modern
technology they just ask a duck.

>>>>>I didn't pluck my bicycle just so you could have monkfish tails.

>>>>Which raises the obvious question: Are we here because the Monkfish
wanted it, or is the Monkfish here at our behest? Furthermore, Monkfish and
bicycle in the same sentence leads to the obvious comparison to the old
saying "I need that like a monkfish needs a P45"

>>>A bit thundery later...

>>I wish that you and that giraffe would stop eating my carpet.

>Here, accept this photograph of a gold ingot as compensation.

In the meantime, if you want to replace the damaged carpet there is a shop
near here that sells carpets (although only Purple ones) and it is called
"Purple Carpets aren't us because we don't sell carpets".

0 new messages