Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Query regarding Arthur Booth
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  8 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Cricketislife!  
View profile  
 More options Jul 1 2003, 10:18 am
Newsgroups: uk.sport.cricket
From: "Cricketislife!" <cricketislif.news.inva...@web2news.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 16:16:40 +0200
Local: Tues, Jul 1 2003 10:16 am
Subject: Query regarding Arthur Booth
His story seems to be amazing to me. Comes out of blue in 1946 out of
leagues and takes 111 wickets at 11 apiece and then goes back to club
cricket, coaching..  Why wasnt he chosen earlier when he was younger?
or is it something to do with Verity in yorkshire and hence he could not
get in? Or  have I simply got all my facts wrong and he was not all that
good bowler or something?

.
--
Direct access to this group with http://web2news.com
http://web2news.com/?uk.sport.cricket


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Robert Henderson  
View profile  
 More options Jul 1 2003, 12:09 pm
Newsgroups: uk.sport.cricket
From: Robert Henderson <Phi...@anywhere.demon.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 16:19:42 +0100
Local: Tues, Jul 1 2003 11:19 am
Subject: Re: Query regarding Arthur Booth
In article <46478N...@web2news.com>, Cricketislife! <cricketislif.news.i
nva...@web2news.net> writes

>His story seems to be amazing to me. Comes out of blue in 1946 out of
>leagues and takes 111 wickets at 11 apiece and then goes back to club
>cricket, coaching..  Why wasnt he chosen earlier when he was younger?
>or is it something to do with Verity in yorkshire and hence he could not
>get in?

That's about it. Second choice for Yorkshire as a SLA bowler in the
thirties was one H. Fisher, who had the distinction of taking  the first
all LBW  hat-trick. RH

> Or  have I simply got all my facts wrong and he was not all that
>good bowler or something?

>.

--
Robert Henderson
phi...@anywhere.demon.co.uk
Blair Scandal web site at http://www.geocities.com/blairscandal/
Personal web site at http://www.anywhere.demon.co.uk

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Cricketislife!  
View profile  
 More options Jul 1 2003, 12:32 pm
Newsgroups: uk.sport.cricket
From: "Cricketislife!" <cricketislif.news.inva...@web2news.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 18:30:04 +0200
Local: Tues, Jul 1 2003 12:30 pm
Subject: Re: Query regarding Arthur Booth
Robert Henderson wrote:
> That's about it. Second choice for Yorkshire as a SLA bowler in the
> thirties was one H. Fisher, who had the distinction of
> taking  the first all LBW  hat-trick. RH

==========

RH, So u r also saying that Booth, deserved a better treatment than he
got? how was he when he was young and why didnt he play more often. Is
it because of Fisher getting a spot ahead of him? could u be slightly
more elaborate and clear up my confusion, please?

.
--
Direct access to this group with http://web2news.com
http://web2news.com/?uk.sport.cricket


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Robert Henderson  
View profile  
 More options Jul 1 2003, 2:18 pm
Newsgroups: uk.sport.cricket
From: Robert Henderson <Phi...@anywhere.demon.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 18:07:21 +0100
Local: Tues, Jul 1 2003 1:07 pm
Subject: Re: Query regarding Arthur Booth
In article <46565N...@web2news.com>, Cricketislife! <cricketislif.news.i
nva...@web2news.net> writes

>Robert Henderson wrote:
>> That's about it. Second choice for Yorkshire as a SLA bowler in the
>> thirties was one H. Fisher, who had the distinction of
>> taking  the first all LBW  hat-trick. RH
>==========

>RH, So u r also saying that Booth, deserved a better treatment than he
>got?

No, I am saying  Yorkshire had better SLA  bowlers at the time. RH

> how was he when he was young and why didnt he play more often. Is
>it because of Fisher getting a spot ahead of him? could u be slightly
>more elaborate and clear up my confusion, please?

>.

Rhodes held the SLA slot (backed up by Roy Kilner until his death in
1927) in the Yorkshire side until 1930. Verity took over the position in
the same year.

Booth could have gone to another county, but would have had to spend two
years qualifying. Instead, he preferred to make a decent living in the
leagues. rH

--
Robert Henderson
phi...@anywhere.demon.co.uk
Blair Scandal web site at http://www.geocities.com/blairscandal/
Personal web site at http://www.anywhere.demon.co.uk


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Cricketislife!  
View profile  
 More options Jul 1 2003, 3:19 pm
Newsgroups: uk.sport.cricket
From: "Cricketislife!" <cricketislif.news.inva...@web2news.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 21:17:44 +0200
Local: Tues, Jul 1 2003 3:17 pm
Subject: Re: Query regarding Arthur Booth
Robert Henderson wrote:
> No, I am saying  Yorkshire had better SLA  bowlers at the time. RH
>>.
> Rhodes held the SLA slot (backed up by Roy Kilner until his death in
> 1927) in the Yorkshire side until 1930. Verity took over
> the position in the same year.

--

Oh, ok. thanks. thats what was my first feeling too but I was just
wondering at that 1946 season his. Amazing, topped the national averages
for Eng and at that age too. Bit like Padmalkar Shivalkar, a wonderful
left arm spinner in India whose career coincided with Bedi and hence
could never get a look in. Gavaskar rates him as highly as he does Bedi.

.
--
Direct access to this group with http://web2news.com
http://web2news.com/?uk.sport.cricket


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
John Hall  
View profile  
 More options Jul 1 2003, 4:47 pm
Newsgroups: uk.sport.cricket
From: John Hall <news_ma...@jhall.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 21:12:42 +0100
Local: Tues, Jul 1 2003 4:12 pm
Subject: Re: Query regarding Arthur Booth
In article <46645N...@web2news.com>,

 Cricketislife! <cricketislif.news.inva...@web2news.net> writes:
>Robert Henderson wrote:
>> No, I am saying  Yorkshire had better SLA  bowlers at the time. RH
>>>.
>> Rhodes held the SLA slot (backed up by Roy Kilner until his death in
>> 1927) in the Yorkshire side until 1930. Verity took over
>> the position in the same year.
>--

>Oh, ok. thanks. thats what was my first feeling too but I was just
>wondering at that 1946 season his. Amazing, topped the national averages
>for Eng and at that age too.

There were a lot of elderly bowlers around in 1946. Booth might well
have played at least a few games for Yorkshire earlier than he did, had
the Championship not been suspended from 1940-5 inclusive. OTOH, had
Verity not lost his life in the war, it's possible that Booth might
never had got to play for Yorkshire at all.
--
John Hall

          "Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong."
                                                             Oscar Wilde


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
jim brant  
View profile  
 More options Jul 1 2003, 5:01 pm
Newsgroups: uk.sport.cricket
From: "jim brant" <j...@brantj.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 22:01:29 +0100
Local: Tues, Jul 1 2003 5:01 pm
Subject: Re: Query regarding Arthur Booth
"John Hall" <news_ma...@jhall.co.uk> wrote in message

news:RSVNsEW6seA$EwnE@jhall.demon.co.uk...

He did in fact play two games for Yorkshire in 1931. When he played his last
game for them he was 45 yo.

The story current in my village after the war was that Yorkshire had a
number of good SLA bowlers to pick from to replace Verity. They had a sort
of competition, which Wardle won. One of the other possibles was Allan
Mason, who came from the village, and played 18 games for Yorkshire. Apart
from the fact that he turned out not to be as good as Wardle ( he took
50-odd wickets, but at 28.8 or so), Wardle was much the better batsman.

Jim


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
David North  
View profile  
 More options Jul 2 2003, 4:46 pm
Newsgroups: uk.sport.cricket
From: "David North" <dno...@abbeymanor.fsbusiness.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 21:46:18 +0100
Local: Wed, Jul 2 2003 4:46 pm
Subject: Re: Query regarding Arthur Booth

Not much of a chance - 27 overs in the two matches, taking 1-41. Yorkshire won both matches by 10
wickets.

He also played a couple of f-c games for Minor Counties, taking 5-131 against the 1936 Indian
tourists, including Merchant, Wazir Ali and Amarnath (couldn't prevent an innings defeat, though -
Nissar and Amar Singh rolled MC over for 42 in their second innings, despite Bill Edrich and Paul
Gibb being in the line-up).

http://www.cricketarchive.co.uk/Archive/Scorecards/f/15/f15157.html

> When he played his last
> game for them he was 45 yo.

> The story current in my village after the war was that Yorkshire had a
> number of good SLA bowlers to pick from to replace Verity. They had a sort
> of competition, which Wardle won. One of the other possibles was Allan
> Mason, who came from the village, and played 18 games for Yorkshire. Apart
> from the fact that he turned out not to be as good as Wardle ( he took
> 50-odd wickets, but at 28.8 or so), Wardle was much the better batsman.

Batting would not have helped Booth's case, either, compared to Verity and Fisher.
--
David North
Email to this address will be deleted as spam
Use usenetATlaneHYPHENfarm.fsnet.co.uk

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »