Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

New Met office web site (Beta)

5 views
Skip to first unread message

Will Hand

unread,
Sep 8, 2011, 1:27:59 PM9/8/11
to
Anyone tried it yet?
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/public/beta/

-----------------------------------------------------------
Will (Haytor, Devon, 1017 feet asl)
-----------------------------------------------------------

Roger Smith

unread,
Sep 8, 2011, 1:39:29 PM9/8/11
to

"Will Hand" <wi...@lyneside.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:PW6aq.8028$QO3....@newsfe08.ams2...
Yes - but I cannot find the 15-minute rainfall radar sequence that used to
be on Invent.
:(
Roger


Nick Gardner

unread,
Sep 8, 2011, 2:05:05 PM9/8/11
to
On 08/09/2011 18:27, Will Hand wrote:
> Anyone tried it yet?
> http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/public/beta/

I've tried Will, but the Met Offices' website has been really slow for
the last few days that I have given up for now.
____________________________
Nick G
Otter Valley, Devon
83 m amsl
http://www.ottervalley.co.uk

Graham P Davis

unread,
Sep 8, 2011, 2:21:56 PM9/8/11
to
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/public/beta/weather/observations/?tab=map

Unfortunately, as I see it, the radar and forecast have been separated.
However, I'll see how I get on with it.



--
Graham Davis, Bracknell
Whilst it's true that money can't buy you happiness, at least you can
be miserable in comfort.
Newsreader for Windows, Mac, Unix family: http://pan.rebelbase.com/

Adam Lea

unread,
Sep 8, 2011, 2:24:57 PM9/8/11
to
Where will the tropical cyclone pages be located?

John Hall

unread,
Sep 8, 2011, 2:49:33 PM9/8/11
to
In article <PW6aq.8028$QO3....@newsfe08.ams2>,
Just given it a very brief visit as a result of your message, Nice
graphics, but that means that it seems to take longer to load. And I
don't like the emphasis on cities rather than on regions. Not all of us
live in one of the featured cities.
--
John Hall
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick
themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened."
Winston S Churchill (1874-1965)

Dawlish

unread,
Sep 8, 2011, 3:21:39 PM9/8/11
to
On Sep 8, 6:27 pm, "Will Hand" <w...@lyneside.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> Anyone tried it yet?http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/public/beta/
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Will (Haytor, Devon, 1017 feet asl)
> -----------------------------------------------------------

My first inpressions are that I like it. The functionality seems
better and I like the video presentation of precipitation
probabilities, but we'll have to wait to judge that properly. I've
only had a cursory view, but I couldn't easily see a link to the
rainfall radar and I was disapppointed that you couldn't build that in
to your customised page. Maybe i'm missing something there and you
will be able to. I've long said that could provide people with more
info than much of the rest of the precipitation forecast, especially
when severe precipitation warnings are in effect and I've emailed the
meto to suggest that. Am I missing something, or have the MetO missed
a trick there? Some easily accessible info about how to interpret the
radar would be necessary, of course.

Still got to see the new warnings site, but that simply *has* to be an
improvement. It would be hard to design something quite so useless, to
so many, so often.

Len Wood

unread,
Sep 8, 2011, 4:21:12 PM9/8/11
to
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Radar rainfall is there OK but it ought to be made a bit easier to
find.
It has images back every 15 mins over only the last 3 hrs which I
think is disappointing. At present it is the last 6 hrs.

Forecast radar rain is there as well but it seems to take a long time
to load and then is jerky.
I prefer to have time imprinted on the image rather than on the bar
below which requires you pointing to it with your mouse.

Len in foggy Wembury



Roger Smith

unread,
Sep 8, 2011, 5:13:53 PM9/8/11
to

"Graham P Davis" <new...@scarlet-jade.com> wrote in message
news:9csfe4...@mid.individual.net...
Thanks Graham. For me the site is very slow (but maybe because my machine
is not in a good mood today) so I assumed that when nothing happened when I
clicked links there was nothing at the other end.

Further exploration will have to await clean-up of memory or something.

The radar map seems lacking in detail so for the moment I shall have to
guess* where I am located.
:)
Roger
Farnborough Hants

* No help please!

PS for Len the 15 min interval radar on Invent was only 3 hours - it was the
30 min radar that went back 6 hours. A pity lt has not been upgraded to
give the best of both worlds.


James Brown

unread,
Sep 8, 2011, 5:29:41 PM9/8/11
to
In message <WNSdnQdbj5aGnvTT...@bt.com>, Nick Gardner
<nickg...@nospambtinternet.com> writes
Regarding the radar side - if you zoom in the resolution seems better
than the previous site, but I find the blanks between each image
distracting. Give me Rain Today by the Meteo group any day.

Cheers
--
James Brown

Graham P Davis

unread,
Sep 8, 2011, 5:52:03 PM9/8/11
to
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 22:29:41 +0100, James Brown wrote:


>
> Regarding the radar side - if you zoom in the resolution seems better
> than the previous site, but I find the blanks between each image
> distracting. Give me Rain Today by the Meteo group any day.
>

I was about to post a message asking what you were talking about, as
there were no blanks on the display I was watching. Now there are. Is it
catching?

Will Hand

unread,
Sep 9, 2011, 4:01:53 AM9/9/11
to

"Len Wood" <wave...@fsmail.net> wrote in message
news:37aab1b4-a6e1-4fe5...@c29g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...

Len in foggy Wembury
==================================

Thanks for all your comments. I cannot answer detailed queries as the web
site is nothing to do with me. I agree with the lack of high visibility of
the radar data, it took me ages to find it as well! Rest assured *all* your
comments will be read by appropriate people at the Met Office, so don't be
afraid to keep them coming in this one thread.

Will
--


Andy M.

unread,
Sep 9, 2011, 5:07:49 AM9/9/11
to
On Sep 9, 9:01 am, "Will Hand" <w...@lyneside.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> "Len Wood" <wavetr...@fsmail.net> wrote in message

I can't find the radar expect the last frame under rain. Where is the
radar animation? I am afraid I will stay with xcweather and avbrief
et al. than come here. The only thing I regularly take from the Met
Office is the satellite images and have a look at weather warnings.

Howard Neil

unread,
Sep 9, 2011, 5:27:33 AM9/9/11
to
On 08/09/2011 19:21, Graham P Davis wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:39:29 +0100, Roger Smith wrote:
>
>> "Will Hand"<wi...@lyneside.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:PW6aq.8028$QO3....@newsfe08.ams2...
>>> Anyone tried it yet? http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/public/beta/
>>>
>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>> Will (Haytor, Devon, 1017 feet asl)
>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>> Yes - but I cannot find the 15-minute rainfall radar sequence that used
>> to be on Invent.
>> :(
>> Roger
>
> http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/public/beta/weather/observations/?tab=map
>
> Unfortunately, as I see it, the radar and forecast have been separated.
> However, I'll see how I get on with it.
>
>
>


All I can see there is a page of text. That is in both Firefox and
Chrome. In fact, I don't seem to have any graphics anywhere. Is there a
program (e.g.jave, javascript, flash, etc) update needed? If there is,
I'm not getting any prompts for it.

--
Howard Neil

Howard Neil

unread,
Sep 9, 2011, 5:39:13 AM9/9/11
to


The map has finally appeared in Chrome but still nothing in Firefox. It
is sooooo slooooowwwww.


--
Howard Neil

Howard Neil

unread,
Sep 9, 2011, 5:51:02 AM9/9/11
to

I have now tried in Firfox safe mode (to eliminate the possibility that
this problem is being caused by one of my add-ons and it is still not
working. It is Firefox 6.0.2 (the latest stable release)

Perhaps I will have to say bye bye to the Met Office until they fix it.

--
Howard Neil

Ken

unread,
Sep 9, 2011, 6:44:24 AM9/9/11
to
In article <PW6aq.8028$QO3....@newsfe08.ams2>,
wi...@lyneside.demon.co.uk says...
At first I could only see the text - no map - using Firefox 6.0.2. Had
to set exceptions within Adblock Plus to get it to display the map.

Nice to be able to zoom in on the radar.

Sir Loin Steak

unread,
Sep 9, 2011, 7:01:32 AM9/9/11
to
On Sep 9, 11:44 am, Ken <m...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> In article <PW6aq.8028$QO3.7...@newsfe08.ams2>,
> w...@lyneside.demon.co.uk says...> Anyone tried it yet?

Hmm... I thought I'd posted this message but perhaps not. Unless I
sent it directly to Howard by mistake! Anyway...

I use Firefox at home and at uni, and while I can see everything fine
at home, I can only see text at uni. I'm guessing it's got something
to do with flash/java.

The blanks between the radar image annoy me too, as does the speed. It
it possible to make it go faster than 2x? It seems really slow and
monotonous as it is.

Finally, I preferred the temperature 'map' as used on Invent (where
the country is shaded to represent temperature), rather than the
temperature symbols that appear on the beta site. Is there no way of
getting the temperature map back? It makes it a lot easier to see the
changes in temperature, and determine which direction the warm/cool
air is moving from.

That is all for now!

--
Liam (Milton Keynes)
http://www.physics.open.ac.uk/~lsteele/

Ken

unread,
Sep 9, 2011, 7:02:58 AM9/9/11
to

>
> I have now tried in Firfox safe mode (to eliminate the possibility that
> this problem is being caused by one of my add-ons and it is still not
> working. It is Firefox 6.0.2 (the latest stable release)
>
> Perhaps I will have to say bye bye to the Met Office until they fix it.
>
>
See my other post. Adblock Plus in Firefox if you're running it?

James Brown

unread,
Sep 9, 2011, 3:54:28 AM9/9/11
to
In message <9csro3...@mid.individual.net>, Graham P Davis
<new...@scarlet-jade.com> writes
>On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 22:29:41 +0100, James Brown wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Regarding the radar side - if you zoom in the resolution seems better
>> than the previous site, but I find the blanks between each image
>> distracting. Give me Rain Today by the Meteo group any day.
>>
>
>I was about to post a message asking what you were talking about, as
>there were no blanks on the display I was watching. Now there are. Is it
>catching?
>
>
>

Is what catching Graham?

;-))
--
James Brown

Graham P Davis

unread,
Sep 9, 2011, 7:15:17 AM9/9/11
to
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 10:51:02 +0100, Howard Neil wrote:

> On 09/09/2011 10:39, Howard Neil wrote:
>> On 09/09/2011 10:27, Howard Neil wrote:

<snip>


>>>
>>> All I can see there is a page of text. That is in both Firefox and
>>> Chrome. In fact, I don't seem to have any graphics anywhere. Is there
>>> a program (e.g.jave, javascript, flash, etc) update needed? If there
>>> is, I'm not getting any prompts for it.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The map has finally appeared in Chrome but still nothing in Firefox. It
>> is sooooo slooooowwwww.
>>
>>
>>
> I have now tried in Firfox safe mode (to eliminate the possibility that
> this problem is being caused by one of my add-ons and it is still not
> working. It is Firefox 6.0.2 (the latest stable release)
>
> Perhaps I will have to say bye bye to the Met Office until they fix it.

I'm also using Firefox 6.0 and have no trouble with the site. Mostly
loads in under a second and I haven't seen it take as long as two.
However, just trying Konqueror and in never loads. One difference is that
I've got Adblock on Firefox but not on Konqueror - or, more precisely,
it's not working on Konqueror.

Sir Loin Steak

unread,
Sep 9, 2011, 6:16:23 AM9/9/11
to
On Sep 9, 10:51 am, Howard Neil <inva...@invalid.co.uk> wrote:
> On 09/09/2011 10:39, Howard Neil wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 09/09/2011 10:27, Howard Neil wrote:
> >> On 08/09/2011 19:21, Graham P Davis wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:39:29 +0100, Roger Smith wrote:
>
> >>>> "Will Hand"<w...@lyneside.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
> >>>>news:PW6aq.8028$QO3....@newsfe08.ams2...
> >>>>> Anyone tried it yet?http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/public/beta/

>
> >>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> Will (Haytor, Devon, 1017 feet asl)
> >>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> >>>> Yes - but I cannot find the 15-minute rainfall radar sequence that used
> >>>> to be on Invent.
> >>>> :(
> >>>> Roger
>
> >>>http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/public/beta/weather/observations/?tab=map
>
> >>> Unfortunately, as I see it, the radar and forecast have been separated.
> >>> However, I'll see how I get on with it.
>
> >> All I can see there is a page of text. That is in both Firefox and
> >> Chrome. In fact, I don't seem to have any graphics anywhere. Is there a
> >> program (e.g.jave, javascript, flash, etc) update needed? If there is,
> >> I'm not getting any prompts for it.
>
> > The map has finally appeared in Chrome but still nothing in Firefox. It
> > is sooooo slooooowwwww.
>
> I have now tried in Firfox safe mode (to eliminate the possibility that
> this problem is being caused by one of my add-ons and it is still not
> working. It is Firefox 6.0.2 (the latest stable release)
>
> Perhaps I will have to say bye bye to the Met Office until they fix it.
>
> --
> Howard Neil

I have the same problem too. I use Firefox both at home and uni, but I
get no graphics at uni. I'm guessing it's got something to do with
java/flash.

I do actually like the new site, but agree that the blanks between
radar frames is annoying. And why only 3 hours?

Oh, and I preferred the temperature 'map' as used on invent (where the
country was shaded for temp) rather than just having the circular
symbols with temps in them. Is there any way of getting the
temperature map on there? Or is it already there and I jus can't
see?!!

Graham P Davis

unread,
Sep 9, 2011, 7:48:00 AM9/9/11
to
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 02:07:49 -0700, Andy M. wrote:

> I can't find the radar expect the last frame under rain. Where is the
> radar animation? I am afraid I will stay with xcweather and avbrief et
> al. than come here. The only thing I regularly take from the Met Office
> is the satellite images and have a look at weather warnings.

First, click on the "weather" tab - UK observations - map. Secondly,
click on "rainfall" on the map menu.

Graham P Davis

unread,
Sep 9, 2011, 7:51:15 AM9/9/11
to
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:01:53 +0100, Will Hand wrote:

> Thanks for all your comments. I cannot answer detailed queries as the
> web site is nothing to do with me. I agree with the lack of high
> visibility of the radar data, it took me ages to find it as well! Rest
> assured *all* your comments will be read by appropriate people at the
> Met Office, so don't be afraid to keep them coming in this one thread.

I think it's only more difficult to find because most of us had the old
one bookmarked. On the odd occasion that I had to look for the old UK
radar from the home page, it took more time to find than this one.

Graham P Davis

unread,
Sep 9, 2011, 7:55:47 AM9/9/11
to
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 03:16:23 -0700, Sir Loin Steak wrote:

> Oh, and I preferred the temperature 'map' as used on invent (where the
> country was shaded for temp) rather than just having the circular
> symbols with temps in them. Is there any way of getting the temperature
> map on there? Or is it already there and I jus can't see?!!


On the map menu for forecasts, have you tried Temp.Map ?

Graham P Davis

unread,
Sep 9, 2011, 7:57:48 AM9/9/11
to
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 04:01:32 -0700, Sir Loin Steak wrote:

> Hmm... I thought I'd posted this message but perhaps not. Unless I sent
> it directly to Howard by mistake! Anyway...

You did post it. I replied to that one.

Howard Neil

unread,
Sep 9, 2011, 8:53:43 AM9/9/11
to


Well done Ken (and Graham who also said Adblock) and thank you. I do run
Adblock and applied an exception filter for the met office. It is now
working properly.

--
Howard Neil

Ken

unread,
Sep 9, 2011, 9:27:45 AM9/9/11
to
In article <z8Cdnf_48-7LkffT...@brightview.co.uk>,
inv...@invalid.co.uk says...
Glad that sorted it for you. I had the problem with Windows XP at first
and setting the exception filters like you did fixed it.

However, I then tried viewing it on a Vista laptop with the identical
Adblock setup and it was fine without any filters.

I've now come back to the XP machine, disabled the filters and - it's
OK!

So either summat funny is going on or maybe the Met Office fixed the
problem since this morning.

Ken.

Howard Neil

unread,
Sep 9, 2011, 9:33:50 AM9/9/11
to
or both. ;-)

--
Howard Neil

Will Hand

unread,
Sep 9, 2011, 10:30:17 AM9/9/11
to

"Ken" <m...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:MPG.28d424af2...@news.eternal-september.org...
I run Windows Vista and everything works fine with adblock on. Thank
goodness, as I cannot stand annoying adverts flashing away.

Will
--

liams...@lavabit.com

unread,
Sep 9, 2011, 3:57:03 PM9/9/11
to
I am sure that temperature map wasn't there yesterday!

--
Liam

Roger Smith

unread,
Sep 9, 2011, 6:44:23 PM9/9/11
to

"Will Hand" <wi...@lyneside.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:PW6aq.8028$QO3....@newsfe08.ams2...
> Anyone tried it yet?
> http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/public/beta/
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Will (Haytor, Devon, 1017 feet asl)
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
Not sure if this is part of the beta site but weather warnings have recently
been set out in an almost illegible, seriffed font. Compare their
legibility with the clear, sans-serif headers "Issued at", "Valid from" etc
at the top of the section (see the wind warning for Monday as an example).

These warnings are usually composed in officialese prose and I feel that to
further compromise their assimilation by a questionable choice of typeface
somewhat defeats their object.

Roger


Graham P Davis

unread,
Sep 10, 2011, 2:25:33 AM9/10/11
to
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 23:44:23 +0100, Roger Smith wrote:


> Not sure if this is part of the beta site but weather warnings have
> recently been set out in an almost illegible, seriffed font. Compare
> their legibility with the clear, sans-serif headers "Issued at", "Valid
> from" etc at the top of the section (see the wind warning for Monday as
> an example).
>

I have looked at the warnings on both beta and standard site and see no
serifs. If you could provide a link to the page you are looking at it
would help.

Jeff

unread,
Sep 10, 2011, 3:30:48 AM9/10/11
to
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 18:27:59 +0100, "Will Hand"
<wi...@lyneside.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>Anyone tried it yet?
>http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/public/beta/
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>Will (Haytor, Devon, 1017 feet asl)
>-----------------------------------------------------------

Site did not work yesterday

Appears to be OK today.

Jeff

Roger Smith

unread,
Sep 10, 2011, 5:17:30 AM9/10/11
to

"Graham P Davis" <new...@scarlet-jade.com> wrote in message
news:9d0e6t...@mid.individual.net...
Graham, try

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/weather/uk/se/se_forecast_warnings.html?day=3

It is the only section that I can find on the Met O website that has
seriffed font, and the legibility problem is compounded by the text being in
white on a black background.

Roger


Col

unread,
Sep 10, 2011, 5:50:55 AM9/10/11
to

"Will Hand" <wi...@lyneside.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:8Kjaq.8046$QO3....@newsfe08.ams2...

>
>
>
> Thanks for all your comments. I cannot answer detailed queries as the web
> site is nothing to do with me. I agree with the lack of high visibility of
> the radar data, it took me ages to find it as well! Rest assured *all*
> your comments will be read by appropriate people at the Met Office, so
> don't be afraid to keep them coming in this one thread.

I thought widespread snow was being predicted for early on
Wednsday morning, before I realised that the snowflakes
were in fact little stars :)
If you really must depict night-time weather in this way, just
stick to the crescent moon.
--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl


Col

unread,
Sep 10, 2011, 6:01:41 AM9/10/11
to

"Col" <reddw...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:3eSdnZVvCYucrvbT...@bt.com...

Also, the temp map, with it's dotted lines looks very 'cluttered'.

Mike Causer

unread,
Sep 10, 2011, 6:41:56 AM9/10/11
to
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 10:17:30 +0100
"Roger Smith" <r.sm...@ntlworld.com> wrote:

> It is the only section that I can find on the Met O website that has
> seriffed font, and the legibility problem is compounded by the text being in
> white on a black background.

They load a pile of style-sheets, then a load of javascript, then change
which of all those are in use by taking a guess at what browser you're
using. Flogging through that lot to work out what exactly is going to
be displayed is going to be hard work.

The very extensive use of javascript for pop-up bubble thingies
probably needs a browser that's pretty up-to-date, and any IE older
than 7 is unlikely to handle it.

It displays OK in Firefox 3.6 and Google Chrome 8.0, have you tried
either of those (or newer)?

Mike

Graham P Davis

unread,
Sep 10, 2011, 6:48:11 AM9/10/11
to
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 10:17:30 +0100, Roger Smith wrote:

> "Graham P Davis" <new...@scarlet-jade.com> wrote in message
> news:9d0e6t...@mid.individual.net...
>> On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 23:44:23 +0100, Roger Smith wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Not sure if this is part of the beta site but weather warnings have
>>> recently been set out in an almost illegible, seriffed font. Compare
>>> their legibility with the clear, sans-serif headers "Issued at",
>>> "Valid from" etc at the top of the section (see the wind warning for
>>> Monday as an example).
>>>
>>>
>> I have looked at the warnings on both beta and standard site and see no
>> serifs. If you could provide a link to the page you are looking at it
>> would help.
>>

> Graham, try
>
> http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/weather/uk/se/se_forecast_warnings.html?
day=3


>
> It is the only section that I can find on the Met O website that has
> seriffed font, and the legibility problem is compounded by the text
> being in white on a black background.
>

That's one of the pages I was looking at. No serifs to be seen on
Firefox, Opera, Epiphany. Could it be that there is something about your
settings that is causing the problem?

Colin Youngs

unread,
Sep 10, 2011, 7:18:15 AM9/10/11
to
"Graham P Davis" <new...@scarlet-jade.com> schreef

: On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 10:17:30 +0100, Roger Smith wrote:
: > http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/weather/uk/se/se_forecast_warnings.html?
: day=3

: > It is the only section that I can find on the Met O website that has
: > seriffed font, and the legibility problem is compounded by the text
: > being in white on a black background.


: That's one of the pages I was looking at. No serifs to be seen on
: Firefox, Opera, Epiphany. Could it be that there is something about your
: settings that is causing the problem?

Using Internet Explorer, I too see the text of the warning in a seriffed
font.

Colin Youngs
Brussels


Roger Smith

unread,
Sep 10, 2011, 10:10:47 AM9/10/11
to

"Mike Causer" <m.r.c...@goglemail.com> wrote in message
news:20110910114156.2ae1cc75@surya...
Thanks Mike.

Just went down to view the warning on the laptop (with Firefox v6.0.2 loaded
on Windows 7) only to find that the warning had been cancelled, at least for
SE England! However, after checking and finding warnings for up north I
viewed them only to find the appearance identical, viz headings in
sans-serif, the warning text seriffed.

The only commonality between the two machines is the cable link to the modem
from Virgin, but surely that cannot be relevant. What setting adjustments
might be worth trying?

Roger


Mike Causer

unread,
Sep 10, 2011, 12:11:10 PM9/10/11
to
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:10:47 +0100
"Roger Smith" <r.sm...@ntlworld.com> wrote:

> The only commonality between the two machines is the cable link to the modem
> from Virgin, but surely that cannot be relevant.

I have known something vaguely along those lines cause an immense
amount of trouble tracking down a file-transfer problem, but that was
20 years ago and I don't think it's an issue now.


> What setting adjustments might be worth trying?

As well as specifying your preferred fonts there's normally a button or
tick-box for "Allow pages to chose their own fonts, instead of my
selections" (that's the Firefox version). Checking that is the first
thing I'd do.



Mike

Roger Smith

unread,
Sep 10, 2011, 1:24:58 PM9/10/11
to

"Mike Causer" <m.r.c...@goglemail.com> wrote in message
news:20110910171110.5a89e63a@surya...
Thanks Mike. Done that, undone that, saved my default to arial, etc. No
joy. This warning is the only seriffed text passage I have found in any of
my favorite (sic) sites.

Roger


Graham P Davis

unread,
Sep 10, 2011, 2:06:01 PM9/10/11
to
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:10:47 +0100, Roger Smith wrote:

> The only commonality between the two machines is the cable link to the
> modem from Virgin, but surely that cannot be relevant.

I'm also with VM so that's not the problem.

Graham P Davis

unread,
Sep 10, 2011, 4:59:11 PM9/10/11
to
I'm running Linux; you and Roger are on MS. I see Mike's posting using
Claws but that could be on any OS. Not sure why the OS should matter but
you never know.

Mike Causer

unread,
Sep 10, 2011, 6:02:55 PM9/10/11
to
On 10 Sep 2011 20:59:11 GMT
Graham P Davis <new...@scarlet-jade.com> wrote:

> I'm running Linux; you and Roger are on MS. I see Mike's posting using
> Claws but that could be on any OS. Not sure why the OS should matter but
> you never know.

Claws requires "Linux or other POSIX-compliant Unix-like operating system
GTK+ 2.10.x or later", so yes, I'm running Linux too.

Could be a factor, but OTOH I'd expect MetO to check out their new site
with MS browsers first, or even only :-(


Mike

Graham P Davis

unread,
Sep 10, 2011, 7:29:29 PM9/10/11
to
I know that, in the past, they always aimed for W3C compliance. In some
cases, this has meant they've had to use special exceptions for IE-users
as Microsoft has never really cottoned on to the concept of standards.
I've checked the home page and the warnings pages and the operational
ones are compliant but the beta page has some errors relating to HTML5
code.

What I was wondering about the importance - or not - of the OS, was
whether the system fonts are being used for these particular warning
windows instead of the browser's fonts.
0 new messages