Swine flu fatal? Or Tamiflu fatal?
john
25 Harrisville Road,
Tuakau 2121.
092368990.
Reference:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/health/news/article.cfm?c_id=204&objectid=10603818&ref=emailfriend
Swine flu fatal? Or Tamiflu fatal?
Dear Sir,
A question needing an answer by Dr Claire McLintoch's study of pregnant
women with swine flu, is whether or not Tamiflu is safe in pregnant women.
In Australia
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/newshome/6214085/footy-friends-rally-after-perkin-loses-wife-and-son/
Claire Perkins was given became ill and was given Tamiflu. Tests later found
she did not have Swine Flu. Two days into the course of Tamiflu, she was
having sudden headaches, double vision and stomach cramps and a blotchy red
rash, and was rushed to hospital. Her still born baby was later delivered
by caesarian and six days afterwards the mother died.
Is "the" flu killing mothers and babies, or "Tami"flu?
Tamiflu has not been tested in pregnant women with swine flu before, because
real life 2009 is that "test". Since women are immunosuppressed in
pregnancy, and because swine flu is a "new" virus, Tamiflu's safety,
concurrent with swine flu infection, would seem a fundamental question
needing an answer.
Hilary Butler.
Happy Oyster
>Hilary Butler.
is an extremely clueless person.
.
--
How a sect kills YOUR children
http://www.pharmamafia.com
Mark Probert
> Hilary Butler,
>
> 25 Harrisville Road,
>
> Tuakau 2121.
>
> 092368990.
>
>
> Swine flu fatal? Or Tamiflu fatal?
>
> Dear Sir,
>
> A question needing an answer by Dr Claire McLintoch's study of pregnant
> women with swine flu, is whether or not Tamiflu is safe in pregnant women.
> Claire Perkins was given became ill and was given Tamiflu. Tests later found
> she did not have Swine Flu. Two days into the course of Tamiflu, she was
> having sudden headaches, double vision and stomach cramps and a blotchy red
> rash, and was rushed to hospital. Her still born baby was later delivered
> by caesarian and six days afterwards the mother died.
>
> Is "the" flu killing mothers and babies, or "Tami"flu?
>
> Tamiflu has not been tested in pregnant women with swine flu before, because
> real life 2009 is that "test". Since women are immunosuppressed in
> pregnancy, and because swine flu is a "new" virus, Tamiflu's safety,
> concurrent with swine flu infection, would seem a fundamental question
> needing an answer.
>
> Hilary Butler.
Hilary Butler is an anti-vac liar.
Period.
Peter Bowditch
>On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 08:54:40 +0100, "john" <nos...@bt.com> wrote:
>
>>Hilary Butler.
>
>is an extremely clueless person.
>.
I was extremely pleased to find out one day that she was defaming me
in some comments on the British Medical Journal's web site, although
she was careful (or frightened) enough to refrain from actually using
my name. She was defending the right to beat children to death and
blame vaccines for it at the time.
--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
Happy Oyster
wrote:
>Happy Oyster <happy....@ariplex.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 08:54:40 +0100, "john" <nos...@bt.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Hilary Butler.
>>
>>is an extremely clueless person.
>>.
>
>I was extremely pleased to find out one day that she was defaming me
>in some comments on the British Medical Journal's web site, although
>she was careful (or frightened) enough to refrain from actually using
>my name. She was defending the right to beat children to death and
>blame vaccines for it at the time.
WHAT!? What did she write? Do you have copies?
Peter Bowditch
>On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:01:46 GMT, Peter Bowditch <myfir...@ratbags.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Happy Oyster <happy....@ariplex.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 08:54:40 +0100, "john" <nos...@bt.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hilary Butler.
>>>
>>>is an extremely clueless person.
>>>.
>>
>>I was extremely pleased to find out one day that she was defaming me
>>in some comments on the British Medical Journal's web site, although
>>she was careful (or frightened) enough to refrain from actually using
>>my name. She was defending the right to beat children to death and
>>blame vaccines for it at the time.
>
>WHAT!? What did she write? Do you have copies?
>.
It was some years ago and I don't know if I could still find it on the
BMJ site. If I remember correctly she said that I must be demented to
doubt that a violent criminal could harm a baby.