> Using 2010 as the base reference, the big gainer in the population
> derby will be blacks or sub-Sahara Africans. This group will expand
> almost 133% to 2.7 billion by 2060. By the middle of this century
> blacks will represent 25.38% of world population, which is up
> dramatically from the 8.97% they recorded in 1950.

> The big population story of the 21st Century is shaping up to be the
> status reversal of whites and blacks and the Indian baby boom. A side
> bar will be the single digit minority role that whites will assume. Of
> the 7 population groups studied, only whites are projected to sustain
> an absolute decline in numbers.

> In 1950 whites and blacks were respectively 27.98% and 8.97% of world
> population. By 2060 these figures will almost reverse as blacks surge
> to 25.38% and whites shrink to 9.76%. From 2010 the white population
> will decline while blacks will add 1.2 billion to their numbers. In
> this time frame the the Indian subcontinent will gain 1.2 billion
> people. These groups and their governments will be looking for elbow
> room, and the diminished presence of whites in Europe, and especially
> in the relatively wide open spaces North America, will provide such an
> opportunity. Specifically, countries like Canada, the United States,
> Argentina, Brazil, Australia, New Zealand, and Russia can expect to be
> pressured to accept collectively hundreds of millions of refugees from
> India, and sub-Sahara Africa.

> http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute.org/publications.php?b=population

> The Utter Normality Of Ethonationalism—Except For Whites by Prof Kevin
> McDonald http://www.vdare.com/macdonald/080327_muller.htm

> Kevin MacDonald's The Culture of Critique Reviewed by Stanley Hornbeck
> http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/review-AR.html

> In The Culture of Critique, Kevin MacDonald advances a carefully
> researched but extremely controversial thesis: that certain 20th
> century intellectual movements -- largely established and led by Jews
> -- have changed European societies in fundamental ways and destroyed
> the confidence of Western man. He claims that these movements were
> designed, consciously or unconsciously, to advance Jewish interests
> even though they were presented to non-Jews as universalistic and even
> utopian. He concludes that the increasing dominance of these ideas has
> had profound political and social consequences that benefited Jews but
> caused great harm to gentile societies. This analysis, which he makes
> with considerable force, is an unusual indictment of a people
> generally thought to be more sinned against than sinning.

> The intellectual movements Prof. MacDonald discusses in this volume
> are Marxism, Freudian psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt school of
> sociology, and Boasian anthropology. Perhaps most relevant from a
> racial perspective, he also traces the role of Jews in promoting multi-
> culturalism and Third World immigration. Throughout his analysis Prof.
> MacDonald reiterates his view that Jews have promoted these movements
> as Jews and in the interests of Jews, though they have often tried to
> give the impression that they had no distinctive interests of their
> own. Therefore Prof. MacDonald's most profound charge against Jews is
> not ethnocentrism but dishonesty -- that while claiming to be working
> for the good of mankind they have often worked for their own good and
> to the detriment of others. While attempting to promote the
> brotherhood of man by dissolving the ethnic identification of
> gentiles, Jews have maintained precisely the kind of intense group
> solidarity they decry as immoral in others.

> Immigration Prof. MacDonald argues that it is entirely natural for
> Jews to promote open immigration. It brings about the "diversity" Jews
> find comforting and it keeps America open to persecuted co-
> religionists throughout the world. He says Jews are the only group
> that has always fought for mass immigration; a few European ethnic
> organizations have made sporadic efforts to make it easier for their
> own people to come, but only Jews have consistently promoted open
> borders for all comers. Moreover, whatever disagreements they may have
> had on other issues, Jews of every political persuasion have favored
> high immigration.

> This, too, goes back many years, and Prof. MacDonald traces in
> considerable detail the sustained Jewish pro-immigration effort.
> Israel Zangwill, author of the eponymous 1908 play The Melting Pot,
> was of the view that "there is only one way to World Peace, and that
> is the absolute abolition of passports, visas, frontiers, custom
> houses... " He was nevertheless an ardent Zionist and disapproved of
> Jewish intermarriage.

> Although the statue of liberty, properly known as Liberty Enlightening
> the World, was a gift to the United States from France as a tribute to
> American political traditions, the sonnet by the Jewish Emma Lazarus
> helped change it into a symbol of immigration. Affixed to the base of
> the statue several decades after its construction, the poem welcomes
> to America "huddled masses yearning to breath free/The wretched refuse
> of your teeming shore."

> Prof. MacDonald has discovered that implausible arguments about
> diversity being a quintessentially American strength have been made by
> Jews for a long time. He reports that in 1948 the American Jewish
> Committee was urging Congress to believe that "Americanism is the
> spirit behind the welcome that America has traditionally extended to
> people of all races, all religions, all nationalities." Of course,
> there had never been such a tradition. In 1952, the American Jewish
> Congress argued in hearings on immigration that "our national
> experience has confirmed beyond a doubt that our very strength lies in
> the diversity of our peoples." This, too, was at a time when U.S.
> immigration law was still explicitly designed to maintain a white
> majority.

> It is often said that when the old immigration policy was scrapped in
> 1965, scarcely anyone knew, and no one predicted, that the new law
> would change the racial makeup of the country. Prof. MacDonald
> disputes this, arguing that this had been the objective of Jewish
> groups from the beginning.

> Prof. MacDonald finds that Jews have been the foremost advocates of
> immigration in England, France, and Canada, and that Jewish groups
> were the most vocal opponents of independence for Quebec. Australian
> Jews led the effort to dismantle the "white Australia" policy, one
> reason for which was cited in an editorial in the Australian Jewish
> Democrat: "The strengthening of multi-cultural or diverse Australia is
> also our most effective insurance policy against anti-Semitism. The
> day Australia has a Chinese Australian Governor General I would feel
> more confident of my freedom to live as a Jewish Australian." Like
> Earl Raab writing about the United States, this Australian Jew is
> prepared to sacrifice the traditional culture, people, and identity of
> Australia to specifically Jewish interests. It would not be surprising
> if such an openly expressed objective did not have the opposite effect
> from the intended, and increase anti-Jewish sentiment.[..]

> www.davidduke.com
> http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/Blog.htm

>> Less talking, more breeding.

> The Pope would love you!

>> Less talking, more breeding.

>The Pope would love you!

>> On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:06:51 +0000,
>> uk.politics.misc,uk.people.health,uk.sci.med.nursing,uk.local.london,uk.tra nsport.london
>> was polluted by, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax, with this sort of nonsense:

>>> Less talking, more breeding.
>> The Pope would love you!

> Are you a Cork Asian?

> >> Less talking, more breeding.

> > The Pope would love you!

> Well, you know the alternative - import excess pop from the Third World

> --
> Dirk

> http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK
> http://www.theconsensus.org/ - A UK political party
> http://www.onetribe.me.uk/wordpress/?cat=5 - Our podcasts on weird stuff

> Using 2010 as the base reference, the big gainer in the population
> derby will be blacks or sub-Sahara Africans. This group will expand
> almost 133% to 2.7 billion by 2060. By the middle of this century
> blacks will represent 25.38% of world population, which is up
> dramatically from the 8.97% they recorded in 1950.

> The big population story of the 21st Century is shaping up to be the
> status reversal of whites and blacks and the Indian baby boom. A side
> bar will be the single digit minority role that whites will assume. Of
> the 7 population groups studied, only whites are projected to sustain
> an absolute decline in numbers.

> In 1950 whites and blacks were respectively 27.98% and 8.97% of world
> population. By 2060 these figures will almost reverse as blacks surge
> to 25.38% and whites shrink to 9.76%. From 2010 the white population
> will decline while blacks will add 1.2 billion to their numbers. In
> this time frame the the Indian subcontinent will gain 1.2 billion
> people. These groups and their governments will be looking for elbow
> room, and the diminished presence of whites in Europe, and especially
> in the relatively wide open spaces North America, will provide such an
> opportunity. Specifically, countries like Canada, the United States,
> Argentina, Brazil, Australia, New Zealand, and Russia can expect to be
> pressured to accept collectively hundreds of millions of refugees from
> India, and sub-Sahara Africa.

> http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute.org/publications.php?b=population

> The Utter Normality Of Ethonationalism—Except For Whites by Prof Kevin
> McDonald http://www.vdare.com/macdonald/080327_muller.htm

> Kevin MacDonald's The Culture of Critique Reviewed by Stanley Hornbeck
> http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/review-AR.html

> In The Culture of Critique, Kevin MacDonald advances a carefully
> researched but extremely controversial thesis: that certain 20th
> century intellectual movements -- largely established and led by Jews
> -- have changed European societies in fundamental ways and destroyed
> the confidence of Western man. He claims that these movements were
> designed, consciously or unconsciously, to advance Jewish interests
> even though they were presented to non-Jews as universalistic and even
> utopian. He concludes that the increasing dominance of these ideas has
> had profound political and social consequences that benefited Jews but
> caused great harm to gentile societies. This analysis, which he makes
> with considerable force, is an unusual indictment of a people
> generally thought to be more sinned against than sinning.

> The intellectual movements Prof. MacDonald discusses in this volume
> are Marxism, Freudian psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt school of
> sociology, and Boasian anthropology. Perhaps most relevant from a
> racial perspective, he also traces the role of Jews in promoting multi-
> culturalism and Third World immigration. Throughout his analysis Prof.
> MacDonald reiterates his view that Jews have promoted these movements
> as Jews and in the interests of Jews, though they have often tried to
> give the impression that they had no distinctive interests of their
> own. Therefore Prof. MacDonald's most profound charge against Jews is
> not ethnocentrism but dishonesty -- that while claiming to be working
> for the good of mankind they have often worked for their own good and
> to the detriment of others. While attempting to promote the
> brotherhood of man by dissolving the ethnic identification of
> gentiles, Jews have maintained precisely the kind of intense group
> solidarity they decry as immoral in others.

> Immigration Prof. MacDonald argues that it is entirely natural for
> Jews to promote open immigration. It brings about the "diversity" Jews
> find comforting and it keeps America open to persecuted co-
> religionists throughout the world. He says Jews are the only group
> that has always fought for mass immigration; a few European ethnic
> organizations have made sporadic efforts to make it easier for their
> own people to come, but only Jews have consistently promoted open
> borders for all comers. Moreover, whatever disagreements they may have
> had on other issues, Jews of every political persuasion have favored
> high immigration.

> This, too, goes back many years, and Prof. MacDonald traces in
> considerable detail the sustained Jewish pro-immigration effort.
> Israel Zangwill, author of the eponymous 1908 play The Melting Pot,
> was of the view that "there is only one way to World Peace, and that
> is the absolute abolition of passports, visas, frontiers, custom
> houses... " He was nevertheless an ardent Zionist and disapproved of
> Jewish intermarriage.

> Although the statue of liberty, properly known as Liberty Enlightening
> the World, was a gift to the United States from France as a tribute to
> American political traditions, the sonnet by the Jewish Emma Lazarus
> helped change it into a symbol of immigration. Affixed to the base of
> the statue several decades after its construction, the poem welcomes
> to America "huddled masses yearning to breath free/The wretched refuse
> of your teeming shore."

> Prof. MacDonald has discovered that implausible arguments about
> diversity being a quintessentially American strength have been made by
> Jews for a long time. He reports that in 1948 the American Jewish
> Committee was urging Congress to believe that "Americanism is the
> spirit behind the welcome that America has traditionally extended to
> people of all races, all religions, all nationalities." Of course,
> there had never been such a tradition. In 1952, the American Jewish
> Congress argued in hearings on immigration that "our national
> experience has confirmed beyond a doubt that our very strength lies in
> the diversity of our peoples." This, too, was at a time when U.S.
> immigration law was still explicitly designed to maintain a white
> majority.

> It is often said that when the old immigration policy was scrapped in
> 1965, scarcely anyone knew, and no one predicted, that the new law
> would change the racial makeup of the country. Prof. MacDonald
> disputes this, arguing that this had been the objective of Jewish
> groups from the beginning.

> Prof. MacDonald finds that Jews have been the foremost advocates of
> immigration in England, France, and Canada, and that Jewish groups
> were the most vocal opponents of independence for Quebec. Australian
> Jews led the effort to dismantle the "white Australia" policy, one
> reason for which was cited in an editorial in the Australian Jewish
> Democrat: "The strengthening of multi-cultural or diverse Australia is
> also our most effective insurance policy against anti-Semitism. The
> day Australia has a Chinese Australian Governor General I would feel
> more confident of my freedom to live as a Jewish Australian." Like
> Earl Raab writing about the United States, this Australian Jew is
> prepared to sacrifice the traditional culture, people, and identity of
> Australia to specifically Jewish interests. It would not be surprising
> if such an openly expressed objective did not have the opposite effect
> from the intended, and increase anti-Jewish sentiment.[..]

> www.davidduke.com
> http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/Blog.htm