Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Anyone else seen this and thourght light pollution?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Kev Lawrence

unread,
Nov 15, 2009, 3:53:51 AM11/15/09
to

Martin Brown

unread,
Nov 15, 2009, 5:06:02 AM11/15/09
to
Kev Lawrence wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8350770.stm
>
> Kev

More seriously I am inclined to think "Dreamspace" or "Colourspace" and
the ensuing disaster when the wind rips it from its moorings will be
considerably enhanced by the 120m fall to the ground. See.

http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/crime/dreamspace/4155621.Eerie_similarities_with_earlier_German_accident/

Personally I don't have a problem with people writing on the cloudbase
with lasers when the sky is *cloudy*. I do object to them putting beams
into the sky when it is clear (unless for LIDAR scientific work).

Regards,
Martin Brown

Mike Williams

unread,
Nov 15, 2009, 2:32:02 PM11/15/09
to
Wasn't it Kev Lawrence who wrote:
>
>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8350770.stm

I would have thought that worrying about light pollution in the East End
of London was already a lost cause.

--
Mike Williams
Gentleman of Leisure

Kev

unread,
Nov 16, 2009, 7:39:49 AM11/16/09
to

"Mike Williams" <nos...@econym.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:0xyfSvCy...@econym.demon.co.uk...

> Wasn't it Kev Lawrence who wrote:
>>
>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8350770.stm
>
> I would have thought that worrying about light pollution in the East End
> of London was already a lost cause.

True but we don't want anything that sets a standard do we?

kev


0 new messages