It's nice to see
flower of romance
rhiannon s
"flower of romance" <whoc...@me.net> wrote in message
news:M8sUj.305$rM5...@newsfe3-win.ntli.net...
> A newsgroup not full of squabbling. It makes a nice change.
No it doesn't :op
Just kidding. Hi there, welcome, we aren't the most hig traffic newsgroup,
but I like tothink we've got a fairly together vibe type thing going....
That sentence worked a lot better in my head.
--
Rhiannon_s
I am me, this is now, we are here!
trin
> A newsgroup not full of squabbling. It makes a nice change.
Ha! You know you've doomed us all to troll-invasion oblivion by saying
that, don't you?
--
trin
trin
> trin blethered:
> And immediate frantic disputes about everything up to and including
> whether water is wet. <g>
And, of course, what is a bloody pagan when its at home (strangely
typoed as 'horn' *slightly bewildered head shake) anyway?
--
trin
(using the right log-in this time - WHOOPS!)
rhiannon s
"trin" <ur...@lokeandimensions.com> wrote in message
news:2d9718d7-1852-42c6...@27g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> Halla wrote:
> > trin blethered:
> > >flower of romance wrote:
> > >> A newsgroup not full of squabbling. It makes a nice change.
>
> > >Ha! You know you've doomed us all to troll-invasion oblivion by saying
> > >that, don't you?
>
> > And immediate frantic disputes about everything up to and including
> > whether water is wet. <g>
>
> And, of course, what is a bloody pagan when its at home (strangely
> typoed as 'horn' *slightly bewildered head shake) anyway?
>
So how does one define paganism anyway, and are satanists pagans?
Jo B...
news:cba4f427-aa3c-4908...@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> Halla wrote:
> > trin blethered:
> > >flower of romance wrote:
>
> > >> A newsgroup not full of squabbling. It makes a nice change.
> >
> > >Ha! You know you've doomed us all to troll-invasion oblivion by saying
> > >that, don't you?
> >
> > And immediate frantic disputes about everything up to and including
> > whether water is wet. <g>
>
> And, of course, what is a bloody pagan when its at home
Is it different when its at home?
<luvvy Stoppard mode/>
(strangely
> typoed as 'horn' *slightly bewildered head shake) anyway?
Sounds Freudian to me *grin*
Jo
>
> --
> trin
rhiannon s
"Jo B..." <spirit_craft(antispam)@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:SlHUj.145$Nk5...@newsfe15.ams2...
> <n.pit...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
> news:cba4f427-aa3c-4908...@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> > Halla wrote:
> > > trin blethered:
> > > >flower of romance wrote:
> >
> > > >> A newsgroup not full of squabbling. It makes a nice change.
> > >
> > > >Ha! You know you've doomed us all to troll-invasion oblivion by
saying
> > > >that, don't you?
> > >
> > > And immediate frantic disputes about everything up to and including
> > > whether water is wet. <g>
> >
> > And, of course, what is a bloody pagan when its at home
>
> Is it different when its at home?
> <luvvy Stoppard mode/>
>
I want a definition of "home" before we begin debating that one :op
Baird Stafford
"rhiannon s" <mdde...@hotmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
> ...and are satanists pagans?
Puh-lease! Not again!
On the other hand, it *has* been well over fifteen years since that
particular row consumed the attention of the Pagan community on usenet
(at that time, alt.pagan mostly, and soc.religion.paganism to a lesser
extent; alt.religion.wicca was not involved and arwm hadn't even been
newgrouped yet). Maybe it is time for another go-round.
<snip>
Blessed be,
Baird
rhiannon s
"Baird Stafford" <ba...@newstaff.com> wrote in message
news:baird-26AA88....@news-server.cfl.rr.com...
> In article <a_2dnSfQydwJir7VnZ2dnUVZ8tGqnZ2d@plusnet>,
> "rhiannon s" <mdde...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > ...and are satanists pagans?
>
> Puh-lease! Not again!
Ok, are Jedi Knights pagans then? :oP
trin
> So how does one define paganism anyway, and are satanists pagans?
I dunno, do they define as pagans?
I can tell you for certain that (some) Atheists are though.
:}
--
trin
Jani
Only if it's Max / Starr/ Dazza yet again ;)
Jani
(he never did go for coffee with janet and LadyNina, did he? wonder why? :)
flower of romance
"rhiannon s" <mdde...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6YWdnRffmYEtyb_V4p2dnAA@plusnet...
>
> "flower of romance" <whoc...@me.net> wrote in message
> news:M8sUj.305$rM5...@newsfe3-win.ntli.net...
>> A newsgroup not full of squabbling. It makes a nice change.
>
> No it doesn't :op
>
> Just kidding. Hi there, welcome, we aren't the most hig traffic
> newsgroup,
> but I like tothink we've got a fairly together vibe type thing going....
>
> That sentence worked a lot better in my head.
I've been here before and I wasn't very popular. I sort of get why but
that's another story. It's nice to see some groups don't indulge in the
bitchfest that is usenet. I hope you don't mind my comments.
flower of romance
"trin" <ur...@lokeandimensions.com> wrote in message
news:17b376a5-d64f-4c57...@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
LOL. I'm sure you can handle them though it saddens me that they are the
norm; whatever that is.
trin
> TRIN!!!! wrote
> > And, of course, what is a bloody pagan when its at home
>
> Is it different when its at home?
> <luvvy Stoppard mode/>
I dunno. I'm not, but I'd probably be very different if I was actually
very bloody. ;)
> (strangely
> > typoed as 'horn' *slightly bewildered head shake) anyway?
>
> Sounds Freudian to me *grin*
Oh trust me, I know what a pagan at horn is - sometimes not a pretty
sight, I guarantee. *smirk*
--
trin
(at least slightly inebriated right at this very moment in time
trin
> I want a definition of "home" before we begin debating that one :op
Wherever I lay my hat? Thought not sure whether wherever =I= lay =my=
hat'd work for everyone. ;)
--
trin
Not that I've actually /got/ a hat, I don't think...
trin
> rhiannon s wrote:
> > ...and are satanists pagans?
>
> Puh-lease! Not again!
>
> On the other hand, it *has* been well over fifteen years since
...
> Maybe it is time for another go-round.
Can't be much worse* than me asking on NFP (URL here
http://community.livejournal.com/nonfluffypagans/868343.html if you
want it) if "Atheism an acceptable form of a pagan belief, or are
Atheists who claim to be pagans 'doing it wrong'?"
<weg>
* Yes, I realise it can /actually/ be much much MUCH worse, but
y'know, these days, does anyone really care all that much, other than
those who're having their labels assigned for them/borrowed by someone
to apply to someone else?
--
trin
now smoking too much 'cause I've drunk too much
trin
> I wonder what that story is.
I'm wondering if Jani's got her precog turned up too loud again. ;)
--
trin
(slightly soberer now)
Jani
> Halla wrote:
>
>> I wonder what that story is.
>
> I'm wondering if Jani's got her precog turned up too loud again. ;)
Mwahahaha. Time will tell :)
>
> --
> trin
> (slightly soberer now)
Aw, shame. Wanna beer?
Jani
Daniel Cohen
Does that mean you don't have a home?
--
http://www.decohen.com
Send e-mail to the Reply-To address;
mail to the From address is never read
Daniel Cohen
> "Baird Stafford" <ba...@newstaff.com> wrote in message
> news:baird-26AA88....@news-server.cfl.rr.com...
> > In article <a_2dnSfQydwJir7VnZ2dnUVZ8tGqnZ2d@plusnet>,
> > "rhiannon s" <mdde...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > ...and are satanists pagans?
> >
> > Puh-lease! Not again!
>
> Ok, are Jedi Knights pagans then? :oP
Are druids pagan?
Are heathens pagan?
Am I pagan?
Is the pope ...? Sorry, mytrain of thought got diverted to a different
track.
Jani
"Daniel Cohen" <dan...@f2s.com> wrote in message
news:1ignwkl.1qw2vrh14vrjpjN%dan...@f2s.com...
> trin <ur...@lokeandimensions.com> wrote:
>
>> rhiannon s wrote:
>>
>> > I want a definition of "home" before we begin debating that one :op
>>
>> Wherever I lay my hat? Thought not sure whether wherever =I= lay =my=
>> hat'd work for everyone. ;)
>>
>> --
>> trin
>> Not that I've actually /got/ a hat, I don't think...
>
> Does that mean you don't have a home?
I think she was using innuinuendo :)
Jani
1st Century Apostolic Traditionalist UK.RC
Jo B...
> Baird Stafford wrote:
> > rhiannon s wrote:
>
> > > ...and are satanists pagans?
> >
> > Puh-lease! Not again!
> >
> > On the other hand, it *has* been well over fifteen years since
> ...
> > Maybe it is time for another go-round.
>
> Can't be much worse* than me asking on NFP (URL here
> http://community.livejournal.com/nonfluffypagans/868343.html if you
> want it) if "Atheism an acceptable form of a pagan belief, or are
> Atheists who claim to be pagans 'doing it wrong'?"
LMAO - just had a vision of a new LOLgroup ..... LOLPagans *grin*
Jo
Jani
round :)
Jani
"1st Century Apostolic Traditionalist UK.RC"
<broadband[remove]12...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:rQ0Vj.287$Nk5...@newsfe15.ams2...
news.homecall.co.uk
> Psst, Jeff - write post first, hit send later. Doesn't work t'other way
> round :)
Turn your pre-cognition back on then ;-)
L
Jani
"news.homecall.co.uk" <raimyd...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:482588e4$1...@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
What, for Jeff? The predictable person's predictable person? :)
Jani
Jani
"Halla" <ha...@drunkenbastards.spam.com> wrote in message
news:4v2b24h6thtrpsej5...@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 9 May 2008 20:08:32 +0100, "Jo B..."
> <spirit_craft(antispam)@hotmail.com> blethered:
>
>>
>>"trin" <ur...@lokeandimensions.com> wrote in message
>>news:e90f02d7-f87d-47b4...@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>>> Baird Stafford wrote:
>>> > rhiannon s wrote:
>>>
>>> > > ...and are satanists pagans?
>>> >
>>> > Puh-lease! Not again!
>>> >
>>> > On the other hand, it *has* been well over fifteen years since
>>> ...
>>> > Maybe it is time for another go-round.
>>>
>>> Can't be much worse* than me asking on NFP (URL here
>>> http://community.livejournal.com/nonfluffypagans/868343.html if you
>>> want it) if "Atheism an acceptable form of a pagan belief, or are
>>> Atheists who claim to be pagans 'doing it wrong'?"
>>
>>LMAO - just had a vision of a new LOLgroup ..... LOLPagans *grin*
>>
>
> that there's a LOLPagans already. <g>
Pgnizm is srs bsnz *nods*
Jani
flower of romance
> On Fri, 9 May 2008 00:42:52 +0100, "flower of romance"
> <whoc...@me.net> blethered:
>
>>
>>"rhiannon s" <mdde...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:6YWdnRffmYEtyb_V4p2dnAA@plusnet...
>>>
>>> "flower of romance" <whoc...@me.net> wrote in message
>>> news:M8sUj.305$rM5...@newsfe3-win.ntli.net...
>>>> A newsgroup not full of squabbling. It makes a nice change.
>>>
>>> No it doesn't :op
>>>
>>> Just kidding. Hi there, welcome, we aren't the most hig traffic
>>> newsgroup,
>>> but I like tothink we've got a fairly together vibe type thing going....
>>>
>>> That sentence worked a lot better in my head.
>>
>>I've been here before and I wasn't very popular.
>
If you can raise both at the same time it's called a Roger Moore. :)
>
>>I sort of get why but
>>that's another story.
>
including a big one that began with 'a' and I drank too much of it but I'm
over that now and getting better at coping.
>
>>It's nice to see some groups don't indulge in the
>>bitchfest that is usenet.
>
> properly bitchy again any time soon. ;-)
:)
>
>>I hope you don't mind my comments.
>
> Depends what they are. <eg>
>
The ones above. :)
>
> --
> Henceforth I ask not good fortune. I myself am good fortune.
> -Elizabeth Watson
flower of romance
> On Wed, 7 May 2008 19:40:26 -0700 (PDT), trin
> <ur...@lokeandimensions.com> blethered:
>
>>flower of romance wrote:
>>
>>> A newsgroup not full of squabbling. It makes a nice change.
>>
>>that, don't you?
>
> whether water is wet. <g>
I don't know whether water is wet but i know i get wet when it falls on me.
:)
flower of romance
"Baird Stafford" <ba...@newstaff.com> wrote in message
news:baird-26AA88....@news-server.cfl.rr.com...
> In article <a_2dnSfQydwJir7VnZ2dnUVZ8tGqnZ2d@plusnet>,
> "rhiannon s" <mdde...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>
> Puh-lease! Not again!
>
> particular row consumed the attention of the Pagan community on usenet
> (at that time, alt.pagan mostly, and soc.religion.paganism to a lesser
> extent; alt.religion.wicca was not involved and arwm hadn't even been
> newgrouped yet). Maybe it is time for another go-round.
So are Satanists Pagans or not? <*FX: dives for cover*>
flower of romance
>
> "Baird Stafford" <ba...@newstaff.com> wrote in message
> news:baird-26AA88....@news-server.cfl.rr.com...
>> In article <a_2dnSfQydwJir7VnZ2dnUVZ8tGqnZ2d@plusnet>,
>> "rhiannon s" <mdde...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> > ...and are satanists pagans?
>>
>> Puh-lease! Not again!
>
Baird Stafford
> > <snip>
> >> ...and are satanists pagans?
> > Puh-lease! Not again!
Why dive? When it comes to my opinions on the subject, google archives
are your friends....
Blessed be,
Baird
who already wrote it once.
flower of romance
> rhiannon s <mddest...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So how does one define paganism anyway, and are satanists pagans?
>
> I dunno, do they define as pagans?
>
> I can tell you for certain that (some) Atheists are though.
>
> :}
You mean because they don't worship the Jewish god?
trin
> trin wrote
> > rhiannon s wrote:
> >> So how does one define paganism anyway, and are satanists pagans?
>
> > I dunno, do they define as pagans?
>
> > I can tell you for certain that (some) Atheists are though.
>
> You mean because they don't worship the Jewish god?
No.
--
trin
trin
> Jani blethered:
> >Halla wrote
> >> Jo B... blethered:
> >>>LMAO - just had a vision of a new LOLgroup ..... LOLPagans *grin*
>
> >> If we can have LOLTheorists and LOLGoths then there's every chance
> >> that there's a LOLPagans already. <g>
>
> >Pgnizm is srs bsnz *nods*
>
> Yes, I can just see that caption on a kitten now. How jolly. ;-|
>
> If there isn't a LOLPagans then we need one. Srsly.
I could've sworn I'd come across such an entity before, but alas, a
quick Google proved fruitless.
--
trin
flower of romance
bewildered?
>
> --
> trin
flower of romance
> On Mon, 12 May 2008 03:10:31 +0100, "flower of romance"
> <whoc...@me.net> blethered:
>
>>
>
> 'Yes'.
>
> ;-)
>
Suit yourself.
trin
> Halla wrote in message
> > flower of romance blethered:
> >> trin wrote
> >>> flower of romance wrote:
> >>>> trin wrote
> >>>> > rhiannon s wrote:
> >>>> >> So how does one define paganism anyway, and are satanists pagans?
...
> >>>> > I can tell you for certain that (some) Atheists are though.
>
> >>>> You mean because they don't worship the Jewish god?
>
> >>> No.
>
> >>What? You're just gonna leave it there? No clarification? Just leaving me
> >>bewildered?
>
> > Sorry to butt in.. Trin? May I?
>
> > 'Yes'.
...
> Suit yourself.
We usually do.
:)
--
trin
Flower of romance
> flower of romance wrote:
>> Halla wrote in message
>> > flower of romance blethered:
>> >>me
>> >>bewildered?
>>
>> > Sorry to butt in.. Trin? May I?
>>
>> > 'Yes'.
> ...
>> Suit yourself.
>
> We usually do.
Not that there's anything wrong in that. ;)
>
> :)
Flower of romance
> On Tue, 13 May 2008 03:05:24 -0700 (PDT), trin
> <ur...@lokeandimensions.com> blethered:
>
>>flower of romance wrote:
>>> Halla wrote in message
>>> > flower of romance blethered:
>>>
>>> >>me
>>> >>bewildered?
>>>
>>> > Sorry to butt in.. Trin? May I?
>>>
>>> > 'Yes'.
>>...
>>> Suit yourself.
>>
>>We usually do.
>>
>>:)
>
> chronic. I don't suit anyone at all. ;-)
Do you suit you?
>
>
> --
> Summer without flowers,
> kine without milk,
> women without modesty,
> men without valour;
> captives without a king,
> woods without mast,
> sea without produce
> - (Ó Cuív 37)
Flower of romance
> On Tue, 13 May 2008 17:44:13 +0100, "Flower of romance"
> <neve...@flower.com> blethered:
>>Do you suit you?
>
> I am anyone too, unless of course I'm no one.
Unless you're everyone. In that case, does that mean that you're me and I'm
you? Who'se eating these chips?
Lady Nina
wrote:
>
>"trin" <ur...@lokeandimensions.com> wrote in message
>news:17b376a5-d64f-4c57...@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>> flower of romance wrote:
>>
>>> A newsgroup not full of squabbling. It makes a nice change.
>>
>> Ha! You know you've doomed us all to troll-invasion oblivion by saying
>> that, don't you?
>
>Only if it's Max / Starr/ Dazza yet again ;)
>
>Jani
>(he never did go for coffee with janet and LadyNina, did he? wonder why? :)
I'm scary?
<waves to URP>
--
Lady Nina
Just this once.
trin
> Jani wrote:
> >(he never did go for coffee with janet and LadyNina, did he? wonder why? :)
>
> I'm scary?
...
> Just this once.
I'm sure you could've pulled off scary more than once if you'd really
really wanted to. :p
--
trin
Lady Nina
<ha...@drunkenbastards.spam.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 15 May 2008 23:41:18 +0100, Lady Nina <spam...@ntlworld.com>
>blethered:
>
>>On Thu, 8 May 2008 23:24:16 +0100, "Jani" <ja...@jani.adsl24.co.uk>
>>wrote:
>>>Jani
>>>(he never did go for coffee with janet and LadyNina, did he? wonder why? :)
>>
>>I'm scary?
>
>Aw, that sounded so *hopeful*. <g>
<smiles>
I was described as placid last weekend you know. I've definitely
mellowed with age.
>><waves to URP>
>
>Hello! <smashes ant with mouse> How's life?
Good, busy, work is excellent, finally got research report published
and funders are very pleased, enough to dangle more work at me.
Playing hard as well, lots of European trips on the motorbike - Italy
over Whit week.
--
Lady Nina