Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Another Islamic paedophile gang found guilty in the UK

1 view
Skip to first unread message

BurfordTJustice

unread,
May 15, 2013, 5:01:26 AM5/15/13
to
Another Islamic paedophile gang found guilty in the UK

(Oxford) Yet another gang of Islamic males have been found guilty in the UK
of grooming children, raping children and trafficking children. If you want
to read into the story, you will find them here.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/oxford-child-sex-grooming-gang-1889867

But the act of grown men chasing young girls for their sexual gratification
isn't what I wish to discuss. What I want to point out is how over the 8
years this gang preyed on young girls, the authorities (police, Oxford
council, hospitals, social services and child protection groups) all failed
to act when the victims of these evil men reported the abuse they were
suffering to the powers that be.

For example, one of the victims was threatened with arrest for wasting
police time after she told officers in 2006 that one of the defendants had
assaulted her. She said at the time: "I know they are doing it to little
girls as well. Little girls in their school uniform." One officer told the
shocked victim: "You are not the first and you won't be the last."


Another victim was subjected to a violent sex attack at the hotel in 2006.
She was plied with alcohol and drugs, then she sobbed while she was raped
and beaten. Another guest overheard her screams and called police. Photos
were taken of the scene and of the 14-year-old girl's injuries, but the case
was dropped.

Tonight on the bBC's Showcase news program Newsnight, the head of Oxford
Social services Joanna Simons (who has been in office for 6 years)
apologised for not doing enough and for failing these poor girls, but when
asked if she would resign for her terrible handling of this case, she
said... NO.

But what really has caught my eye over this latest case of Islamic grooming
of little white girls is how so many NGOs are trying to tell me this has
nothing to do with religion or race, and that actually more white men are
jailed for paedophilia in the UK than anybody else. Err, people, the UK is
predominately white (around 90%). That means in the scale of all things
statistical, whites are going to come top. But hang on, what's this? The
grooming gangs in Telford, Oldham, Rochdale, Derby, Rotherham were all men
who had a Pakistani background and were Islamic in faith. While Muslims
represent 2% of the population, they account for nearly 20% of the prison
population, and the left try to tell me this isn't about Islam?

And there lies the crux of the problem. For years, if anybody looked funny
at a Muslim, they were deemed to be a racist. Instead of arresting and
jailing Muslims guilty of shagging little girls, the authorities blamed the
victims. Free in the knowledge that the police wouldn't touch them, Muslims
have simply carried out what their unholy Koran tells them to do - murder,
rape and lie.

P.S.: If you feel offended by what I have just written, please take note: I
was born into an Islamic family, I was taken into care at an early age for
being a victim of physical abuse. When the authorities realised that I was
not white, they changed my white social worker for an Islamic one. Her first
words to me: "You have brought shame on your family" and "our father loves
you". Gee, I wonder why I walked out and refused to speak to the Islamic
bitch.

Bill

unread,
May 15, 2013, 5:14:43 AM5/15/13
to
On Wed, 15 May 2013 05:01:26 -0400, "BurfordTJustice"
<bur...@hubdub.mo> wrote:

>. For years, if anybody looked funny
>at a Muslim, they were deemed to be a racist.

Which is odd, because 'Muslim' isn't a race by any method of
measurement.

However sections of the Muslim community is rather given to screaming
'racist' when challenged.

On the other hand living in a country where there is an established
religion and all other religions are openly discriminated against
doesn't help.

BurfordTJustice

unread,
May 15, 2013, 5:24:41 AM5/15/13
to

"Bill" <black...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:cbk6p8h705ujt79nq...@4ax.com...
--
On the other hand, since you did not mention the subject we must
consider the fact that you approve of Child fucking.

The question becomes do you just approve or do you partake??

Bill

unread,
May 15, 2013, 6:23:11 AM5/15/13
to
On Wed, 15 May 2013 05:24:41 -0400, "BurfordTJustice"
<bur...@hubdub.mo> wrote:

>
>Which is odd, because 'Muslim' isn't a race by any method of
>measurement.
>
>However sections of the Muslim community is rather given to screaming
>'racist' when challenged.
>
>On the other hand living in a country where there is an established
>religion and all other religions are openly discriminated against
>doesn't help.
>
>--

Learn to post properly

Please do not use the 'sig' token as a separator. My newsreader cuts
stuff off below that.

>On the other hand, since you did not mention the subject we must
>consider the fact that you approve of Child fucking.

Lie.

>The question becomes do you just approve or do you partake??

More lies.

Goodness you are a nasty little shit.

BurfordTJustice

unread,
May 15, 2013, 6:26:52 AM5/15/13
to

"Bill" <black...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:mdo6p855t841ghfj9...@4ax.com...
--
That is the title of those the approve and/or partake in child fucking.
You do not condemn therefore you approve...hang tough old Abe will
be along shortly to help you.
Why should I or anyone change to please you? Seems you fucks always want
everyone else to change to please you...

Bill

unread,
May 15, 2013, 6:31:15 AM5/15/13
to
On Wed, 15 May 2013 06:26:52 -0400, "BurfordTJustice"
<bur...@hubdub.mo> wrote:

>"Bill" <black...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:mdo6p855t841ghfj9...@4ax.com...
>On Wed, 15 May 2013 05:24:41 -0400, "BurfordTJustice"
><bur...@hubdub.mo> wrote:
>
>>
>>Which is odd, because 'Muslim' isn't a race by any method of
>>measurement.
>>
>>However sections of the Muslim community is rather given to screaming
>>'racist' when challenged.
>>
>>On the other hand living in a country where there is an established
>>religion and all other religions are openly discriminated against
>>doesn't help.
>>
>>--
>
>Learn to post properly
>
>Please do not use the 'sig' token as a separator. My newsreader cuts
>stuff off below that.
>
>>On the other hand, since you did not mention the subject we must
>>consider the fact that you approve of Child fucking.
>
>Lie.
>
>>The question becomes do you just approve or do you partake??
>
>More lies.
>
>Goodness you are a nasty little shit.
>
>--

Learn to post properly, or this is the last time I shall dignify your
crap with an answer.

>That is the title of those the approve and/or partake in child fucking.
>You do not condemn therefore you approve...hang tough old Abe will
>be along shortly to help you.

I don't need Abe to defend me, and I refuse to even enter into a
discussion with you on this matter.

You're vile in a way that is almost unbelievable.

>Why should I or anyone change to please you? Seems you fucks always want
>everyone else to change to please you...

Who are 'you fucks'?

The reason you should change is because you are not using the laid
down systems. That being the case many people will not answer your
posts.

Of course that may be what you want.

abelard

unread,
May 15, 2013, 6:33:09 AM5/15/13
to
On Wed, 15 May 2013 06:26:52 -0400, "BurfordTJustice"
<bur...@hubdub.mo> wrote:

>
ah, you wish to inhibit others from agreeing that you're a pathetic
little shit...

BurfordTJustice

unread,
May 15, 2013, 7:13:14 AM5/15/13
to

"abelard" <abel...@abelard.org> wrote in message
news:61p6p8hpj4dm2uaut...@4ax.com...
--
LOL Right on spot...moooslim/mooslim supporter abe jumps up.
Perhaps you two are like david brooks of Devon. He does not condemn
child fucking either. He also chums up to the gays..so perhaps you and he
just like
the little boys???

practice

unread,
May 15, 2013, 11:21:35 AM5/15/13
to
On 05/15/2013 05:31 AM, Bill wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2013 06:26:52 -0400, "BurfordTJustice"
> <bur...@hubdub.mo> wrote:
>

>>>
>>> --
>>
>> Learn to post properly
>>
>> Please do not use the 'sig' token as a separator. My newsreader cuts
>> stuff off below that.
>>
>>> On the other hand, since you did not mention the subject we must
>>> consider the fact that you approve of Child fucking.
>>
>> Lie.
>>
>>> The question becomes do you just approve or do you partake??
>>
>> More lies.
>>
>> Goodness you are a nasty little shit.
>>
>> --
>
> Learn to post properly, or this is the last time I shall dignify your
> crap with an answer.
>

BTJ, I just tinkled my diapers because you won't post properly. I'm
gonna take my ball and glove and go home! WAAAAAAAAH

kids!

Hotblack Desiato

unread,
May 15, 2013, 12:41:56 PM5/15/13
to


"BurfordTJustice" wrote in message news:kmvk1q$hos$1...@dont-email.me...
lel ... you better be trolling you fucking retard

abelard

unread,
May 15, 2013, 1:02:44 PM5/15/13
to
why not take both of them?

>kids!

BurfordTJustice

unread,
May 16, 2013, 4:04:35 AM5/16/13
to

"Bill" <black...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:oqo6p89bq48b5cm84...@4ax.com...


Learn to post properly, or this is the last time I shall dignify your
crap with an answer.

--
Dear billy bob rangel,
Why in the fuck would I care if you answer or not?
You are not near as important as you think. Now run
along with your mooslim butt buds and fuck another goat/child.

0 new messages