Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Is it time to build a bunker?

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Nozza

unread,
May 2, 2008, 3:22:18 PM5/2/08
to
<http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/default.stm>

Which links to (for when it changes)

<http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7379741.stm>

Alas, not so much bunkeresque as I had hoped for.

Noz

Simon (Dark Angel)

unread,
May 3, 2008, 1:02:38 PM5/3/08
to

"Nozza" <nozza_a...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message ...
> <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7379741.stm>

Wouldn't be much use in a flood though would it?


--
Best Wishes
Simon Taylor - http://actionstations.fotopic.net


Dave Liquorice

unread,
May 3, 2008, 4:47:33 PM5/3/08
to
On Fri, 02 May 2008 20:22:18 +0100, Nozza wrote:

> Alas, not so much bunkeresque as I had hoped for.

But has an element of truth. Modern society is on a knife edge of "just in
time" supplies. It wouldn't take much to knock it of kilter. In general
this country has very localised events and the people in the affected
areas can rely on the resources of unaffected areas to support them. This
may not always be the case... In my view anyone with any sense has at
least a few days, preferably over a week, of non-perishable food in store
and rotated with the day to day food so it is maintained "in date". Those
with a combi and thus no CW storage tank should seriously consider a
backup water supply and that isn't just a case of 500ml bottles of water.
Every person requires over 2l of water/day to remain healthy, family of 4
for a week is 56l and that doesn't include anything for cooking and
associated activities.
--
Cheers
Dave.

google...@trashmail.net

unread,
May 4, 2008, 8:27:32 AM5/4/08
to
> <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7379741.stm>
>
> Alas, not so much bunkeresque as I had hoped for.
>

The stock images were taken at Kelvedon Hatch.

We always have plenty of tinned food and pasta, etc it keeps forever
and it so cheap, we don't stock pile it, but when its like 25p a tin
or something why buy 2 or 3, I just put 20 odd tins in the trolly,
other half moans, but then she's happy to eat it when we've run out of
fresh stuff and its a sunday and the shops are shut!

Stimpy

unread,
May 4, 2008, 6:38:51 PM5/4/08
to
On Sat, 3 May 2008 21:47:33 +0100, Dave Liquorice wrote

I live in rural Mid-Wales... I have a stream running through my garden and
three shotguns

You have been warned :-)

google...@trashmail.net

unread,
May 7, 2008, 10:20:38 AM5/7/08
to
> I live in rural Mid-Wales... I have a stream running through my garden and
> three shotguns
>

Nice ;)

NOSPAM

unread,
May 7, 2008, 11:16:49 AM5/7/08
to
The message <0001HW.C443F98B...@news.eclipse.co.uk>
from Stimpy <stimpy...@yahoo.com> contains these words:


> I live in rural Mid-Wales... I have a stream running through my garden and
> three shotguns

> You have been warned :-)


Just hope that your local police force do not read that.

Bill Again

unread,
May 7, 2008, 11:25:00 AM5/7/08
to

"NOSPAM" <nos...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:3130303030373...@invalid.invalid...

Too late. I told them that he might know something.


Stimpy

unread,
May 7, 2008, 6:21:11 PM5/7/08
to
On Wed, 7 May 2008 16:16:49 +0100, NOSPAM wrote

>
>> I live in rural Mid-Wales... I have a stream running through my garden and
>> three shotguns
>
>> You have been warned :-)
>
> Just hope that your local police force do not read that.

...and the next farm up the road is inhabited by a DCS with whom I go
rabbiting - he already knows

Andy Burns

unread,
May 7, 2008, 7:07:07 PM5/7/08
to

He may well know you have the guns, he may not know you issue threats
about using them ...

Stimpy

unread,
May 8, 2008, 2:36:17 AM5/8/08
to
On Thu, 8 May 2008 00:07:07 +0100, Andy Burns wrote

Where's that threat then? You *chose* to interpret my remark about water
availability and quality as some sort of threat relating to my guns.

I suggest you (a) read the original context, (b) note the smiley and (c)
lighten up.

Round here, we're more worried about the threat to society posed by
Bluetongue at the moment. Vaccine still not available in any quantity and
movement restrictions still in place.

Andy Burns

unread,
May 8, 2008, 3:04:44 AM5/8/08
to
On 08/05/2008 07:36, Stimpy wrote:

> I suggest you (a) read the original context,

I did, and at the time I thought "I wonder if he'd get the licence
renewed so easily if he went round saying things like that in RL, rather
than on usenet", apparently it came across the same way to three others
too, but I originally decided not to post.

> Round here, we're more worried about the threat to society posed by
> Bluetongue at the moment. Vaccine still not available in any quantity and
> movement restrictions still in place.

Ah well, a couple of harsh winters might be required to keep it down.

Stimpy

unread,
May 8, 2008, 11:21:35 AM5/8/08
to
On Thu, 8 May 2008 08:04:44 +0100, Andy Burns wrote

> On 08/05/2008 07:36, Stimpy wrote:
>
>> I suggest you (a) read the original context,
>
> I did, and at the time I thought "I wonder if he'd get the licence
> renewed so easily if he went round saying things like that in RL, rather
> than on usenet", apparently it came across the same way to three others
> too, but I originally decided not to post.

Well of COURSE I wouldn't say stuff like that in the real world, even if I
were carrying a big fuck-off sign with a flourescent smiley on it.

>
>> Round here, we're more worried about the threat to society posed by
>> Bluetongue at the moment. Vaccine still not available in any quantity and
>> movement restrictions still in place.
>
> Ah well, a couple of harsh winters might be required to keep it down.

If we last that long :-(

her_majestys_...@trashmail.net

unread,
May 10, 2008, 11:27:00 AM5/10/08
to
> Just hope that your local police force do not read that.
>

Assuming he has a shotgun licence then they already know he has
shotguns!

As for them reading what he said on the internet, I think they would
have better things to do and what he said is not in the least bit
illegal.

The OP was, of course, refering to a state of national emergency when
the normal staus quo had broken down and, in effect, there would be no
law & order to speak of, other than marshal law. In such an occasion,
the authoirties wouldn't be too bothered about someone taking steps to
defend themselfs and thier family, as long as he didn't start shooting
at them! They would be more concerned with stopping looters, etc and
would, perhaps, see him as helping them.

NOSPAM

unread,
May 10, 2008, 1:54:01 PM5/10/08
to
The message
<09472e25-6677-4df6...@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
from her_majestys_...@trashmail.net contains these words:

He presumably was joking but the police tend to take a dim view about
anyone making any sort of threat involving firearms even if only done as
a joke.

I suspect that wanting a weapon for use after a nuclear strike would not
be considered a valid reason for issuing a firearms licence.

Huss

unread,
May 18, 2008, 5:41:42 AM5/18/08
to
In message <JK-dnfyML6SFq7_VnZ2dnUVZ8q_inZ2d@plusnet>, Andy Burns
<usenet.a...@adslpipe.co.uk> writes

You're either trolling or not very bright/politically correct.
--
Huss

Why so large a cost, having so short a lease, does thou upon your fading
mansion spend?

William Shakespeare

google...@trashmail.net

unread,
May 18, 2008, 1:04:37 PM5/18/08
to
>He may well know you have the guns, he may not know you issue threats
> about using them ...
>

He may also be adult enough not to care!

0 new messages