Stringent fines

[Guy King]

Can we have stringent fines for Gordon Ramsey? He should lose a good
couple of hundred quid per invective.

--
Skipweasel
Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

[Tim Hall]

On Fri, 9 May 2008 08:37:36 +0100, Guy King <guy....@zetnet.co.uk>
wrote:

>Can we have stringent fines for Gordon Ramsey? He should lose a good
>couple of hundred quid per invective.

Hearing him on the Home Service being interviewed by our
"Entertainment Editor" caued a grin, thobut.

(put Alan Bennett on shortly after mind you)

--

Tim

I understand very little of what's being discussed
but for some reason it's fascinating.

(Jon Thompson, urs)

[bobharvey]

On 9 May, 08:37, Guy King <guy.k...@zetnet.co.uk> wrote:
> Can we have stringent fines for Gordon Ramsey? He should lose a good
> couple of hundred quid per invective.

I do think that Viz could make something of the Vegetable police.
"These parsnips look past their best, Mr Ramsey. Are you sure they
aren't last weeks?" And why not meat? "The menu says spring lamb,
but there is no trace of a stressed metal attachment depending for
it's operation on Hooke's law". or Whine? "This beaujolis must have
travelled at least 600KM, Mr Ramsey. You do realise that a pint of
Burton Ale would have far fewer food miles?"

Tosspot. Which is probably a kitchen gadget to be flogged by
Sainsbury's with jamie olive-oil on the label.

[Lister]

On Fri, 9 May 2008 06:03:20 -0700 (PDT), bobharvey
<robert...@my-deja.com> wrote:

>
>Tosspot. Which is probably a kitchen gadget to be flogged by
>Sainsbury's with jamie olive-oil on the label.

Jammy, shirley?

[Paul C. Dickie]

In message <5pk824t8u343mfin3...@4ax.com>, Lister
<fa...@SPAMclara.net> writes

With sticky fingers?

--
< Paul >