Address for Champ?
Dr Ivan D. Reid
I don't do texting (no phone...).
--
Ivan Reid, School of Engineering & Design, _____________ CMS Collaboration,
Brunel University. Ivan.Reid@[brunel.ac.uk|cern.ch] Room 40-1-B12, CERN
GSX600F, RG250WD "You Porsche. Me pass!" DoD #484 JKLO#003, 005
WP7# 3000 LC Unit #2368 (tinlc) UKMC#00009 BOTAFOT#16 UKRMMA#7 (Hon)
KotPT -- "for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty".
Simon Wilson
> Can someone send me an address for snail-mail cheer-ups to Champ?
> I don't do texting (no phone...).
>
http://sendtxt.o2.co.uk/sendtxt/?cm_re=Navigation-_-left-_-Sendtxt
hth
--
/Simon
muddy cat
"Dr Ivan D. Reid" <Ivan...@brunel.ac.uk> wrote:
> Can someone send me an address for snail-mail cheer-ups to Champ?
Can someone e-mail me his mobile number please.
--
Mike
In the end there is one dance you'll do alone
skype: muddycat
http://picasaweb.google.com/bammynmuddy/VisorSock
Dr Ivan D. Reid
<Ivan...@brunel.ac.uk>
wrote in <slrng3oea9.5...@loki.brunel.ac.uk>:
> Can someone send me an address for snail-mail cheer-ups to Champ?
Thanks to the Bonwicks for sending details. Unfortunately personal
mail bounced:
=====
Your message
To: XXXXXXXX Bonwick
Subject: Re: Champ
Sent: Wed, 28 May 2008 09:40:56 +0100
did not reach the following recipient(s):
XXXXXXXXXXXXX@YYYYY on Wed, 28 May 2008 09:40:55 +0100
The message contains a content type that is not supported
<uxexim102.brunel.ac.uk #5.6.1 smtp;554 5.6.1 Body type not
supported by Remote Host>
Longshanks
> On Tue, 27 May 2008 16:39:36 +0000 (UTC), Dr Ivan D. Reid
> <Ivan...@brunel.ac.uk>
> wrote in <slrng3oea9.5...@loki.brunel.ac.uk>:
>> Can someone send me an address for snail-mail cheer-ups to Champ?
>
> Thanks to the Bonwicks for sending details. Unfortunately personal
> mail bounced:
>
> =====
> Your message
>
> To: XXXXXXXX Bonwick
> Subject: Re: Champ
> Sent: Wed, 28 May 2008 09:40:56 +0100
>
> did not reach the following recipient(s):
>
> XXXXXXXXXXXXX@YYYYY on Wed, 28 May 2008 09:40:55 +0100
> The message contains a content type that is not supported
> <uxexim102.brunel.ac.uk #5.6.1 smtp;554 5.6.1 Body type not
> supported by Remote Host>
>
>
Looks like your mail program send some rubbish. The email address is
probably valid..
--
FZS 600 (red 2001)
muddy cat
Longshanks <longs...@no-where123.co.uk> wrote:
It was probably full of bosons or summat.
SaladDodger
> Can someone send me an address for snail-mail cheer-ups to Champ?
... and to me, please
Colin Irvine
<Salad....@gmail.com> squeezed out the following:
>On May 27, 5:39 pm, "Dr Ivan D. Reid" <Ivan.R...@brunel.ac.uk> wrote:
>> Can someone send me an address for snail-mail cheer-ups to Champ?
>
>... and to me, please
And me.
--
Colin Irvine
BOF#33 BONY#34 COFF#06 BHaLC#5
http://www.colinandpat.co.uk
Switters
wrote:
> anyway, I've sent it again (and to Colin & SD).
Is that his home address, or some other address that's suitable for the
interim period? I ask because I have the former, but as he's not there,
seems pointless.
Colin Irvine
out the following:
>On Wed, 28 May 2008 08:57:36 +0000 (UTC), "Dr Ivan D. Reid"
><Ivan...@brunel.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 27 May 2008 16:39:36 +0000 (UTC), Dr Ivan D. Reid
>><Ivan...@brunel.ac.uk>
>> wrote in <slrng3oea9.5...@loki.brunel.ac.uk>:
>>> Can someone send me an address for snail-mail cheer-ups to Champ?
>>
>> Thanks to the Bonwicks for sending details. Unfortunately personal
>>mail bounced:
>
>do you mean my mail to you bounced or a response from you?
>
>anyway, I've sent it again (and to Colin & SD).
Thank you. Not turned up yet 'cos you'll be greylisted.
SaladDodger
> anyway, I've sent it again (and to Colin & SD).
Ta, Mrs B.
Dr Ivan D. Reid
> On Wed, 28 May 2008 08:57:36 +0000 (UTC), "Dr Ivan D. Reid"
><Ivan...@brunel.ac.uk> wrote:
>>On Tue, 27 May 2008 16:39:36 +0000 (UTC), Dr Ivan D. Reid
>><Ivan...@brunel.ac.uk>
>> wrote in <slrng3oea9.5...@loki.brunel.ac.uk>:
>>> Can someone send me an address for snail-mail cheer-ups to Champ?
>> Thanks to the Bonwicks for sending details. Unfortunately personal
>>mail bounced:
> do you mean my mail to you bounced or a response from you?
The response from me bounced.
> anyway, I've sent it again (and to Colin & SD).
Thanks again.
Colin Irvine
out the following:
>On Wed, 28 May 2008 08:57:36 +0000 (UTC), "Dr Ivan D. Reid"
><Ivan...@brunel.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 27 May 2008 16:39:36 +0000 (UTC), Dr Ivan D. Reid
>><Ivan...@brunel.ac.uk>
>> wrote in <slrng3oea9.5...@loki.brunel.ac.uk>:
>>> Can someone send me an address for snail-mail cheer-ups to Champ?
>>
>> Thanks to the Bonwicks for sending details. Unfortunately personal
>>mail bounced:
>
>do you mean my mail to you bounced or a response from you?
>
>anyway, I've sent it again (and to Colin & SD).
Hasn't got here. Did you use
colin (dot) irvine (at) spamcop (dot) net ?
Colin Irvine
out the following:
>Colin Irvine <Colin....@seebottomof.home.page> :
>
>>On Wed, 28 May 2008 12:46:20 +0100, Adie <sp...@bonwick.me.uk> squeezed
>>out the following:
>>
>>>On Wed, 28 May 2008 08:57:36 +0000 (UTC), "Dr Ivan D. Reid"
>>><Ivan...@brunel.ac.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 27 May 2008 16:39:36 +0000 (UTC), Dr Ivan D. Reid
>>>><Ivan...@brunel.ac.uk>
>>>> wrote in <slrng3oea9.5...@loki.brunel.ac.uk>:
>>>>> Can someone send me an address for snail-mail cheer-ups to Champ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to the Bonwicks for sending details. Unfortunately personal
>>>>mail bounced:
>>>
>>>do you mean my mail to you bounced or a response from you?
>>>
>>>anyway, I've sent it again (and to Colin & SD).
>>
>>Hasn't got here. Did you use
>>
>>colin (dot) irvine (at) spamcop (dot) net ?
>
>that's cos it bounced. I'd used the one from your headers amalgamated
>with the domain from your sig (like it said!).
>
>I'll re send.
Ta! And I'll clarify my email address.
Pip
<Colin....@seebottomof.home.page> wrote:
>Thank you. Not turned up yet 'cos you'll be greylisted.
Greylisted. That's just *so* appropriate.
--
Pip: B12
Colin Irvine
<gingerbl...@NOSPAMgmail.com> squeezed out the following:
FOYRNB
Pip
<lo...@bottom.of.home.page> wrote:
>On Thu, 29 May 2008 13:31:59 +0100, Pip
><gingerbl...@NOSPAMgmail.com> squeezed out the following:
>
>>On Wed, 28 May 2008 14:06:30 +0100, Colin Irvine
>><Colin....@seebottomof.home.page> wrote:
>>
>>>Thank you. Not turned up yet 'cos you'll be greylisted.
>>
>>Greylisted. That's just *so* appropriate.
>
>FOYRNB
Hey, I was thinking about Champ.
But there again, if the tint fits....
--
Pip: B12