Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

OT Horrible thought

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Lady Nina

unread,
Aug 27, 2008, 6:13:48 PM8/27/08
to
After Krusty's post I wondered how many UKRM men would be checking for
lumps. Then an image of you all rummaging around popped into my head,
in the sort of clarity that not even strong drugs and gin can wipe
away.

You - yes you, take that filthy leer off your face and get your hand
out of your trousers.
--
Lady Nina

wessie

unread,
Aug 27, 2008, 6:22:26 PM8/27/08
to
Lady Nina <spam...@ntlworld.com> wrote in
news:u8kbb41mba3o052qe...@4ax.com:

I bet you're not as disturbed as I am, knowing that you have visions that
include me.

Anyway, this is one of those jobs where I feel one must GAMI.

--
wessie at tesco dot net

BMW R1150GS

steve auvache

unread,
Aug 27, 2008, 6:31:38 PM8/27/08
to
In article <u8kbb41mba3o052qe...@4ax.com>, Lady Nina
<spam...@ntlworld.com> writes

>After Krusty's post I wondered how many UKRM men would be checking for
>lumps.

I can understand why you do it darling but personally as there is no
comparison between my huge dick/bollox combination and the tiny
offerings of the rest of them I didn't give it a second thought.

--
steve auvache
A Bloo one with built in safety features

platypus

unread,
Aug 27, 2008, 6:39:30 PM8/27/08
to

Coo. I seem to have hairs on the palms of my hands.

Cab

unread,
Aug 28, 2008, 2:38:20 AM8/28/08
to
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 23:13:48 +0100, Lady Nina wibbled:

I can't remember who it was, but some comedian remarked on this a few
years ago. Apparently it was brought up that blokes should check their
nuts every so often for lumps. His comment was that blokes _always_
have their hands on their sacks, so the medical advice was irrelevant.

I wish I could remember who it was. He told the joke so much better.

--
Cab

Greybeard

unread,
Aug 28, 2008, 3:04:42 AM8/28/08
to

"Lady Nina" <spam...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:u8kbb41mba3o052qe...@4ax.com...

No...
I'm enjoying myself ;o)

--
Greybeard

FLHR -03 UK (95 cu-in Stg 2. Big Boy 2!)

Garmin Zumo 550, To get me home!

ukrm@foxtails[dot]co[dot]uk


Scraggy

unread,
Aug 28, 2008, 4:11:17 AM8/28/08
to
Lady Nina wrote:
> After Krusty's post I wondered how many UKRM men would be checking for
> lumps.

<puzzled>
Why, when one owns a woman to do this sort of thing...?

--
I don't care to belong to a club that accepts people like me as
members. Groucho Marx


Message has been deleted

T i m

unread,
Aug 28, 2008, 4:58:06 AM8/28/08
to
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:11:17 +0100, "Scraggy"
<scr...@abuseisgoodforyou.org.be> wrote:

>Lady Nina wrote:
>> After Krusty's post I wondered how many UKRM men would be checking for
>> lumps.
>
><puzzled>
>Why, when one owns a woman to do this sort of thing...?

Indeed and mine used to 'examine' me when she was <ahem> down here
anyway <weg>. Caring yes, 'romantic', no.

She's still going through the change so I've not been checked for
*ages*. :-(

All the best ..

T i m

CT

unread,
Aug 28, 2008, 4:59:13 AM8/28/08
to
T i m wrote:

> She's still going through the change

Jeez, not another one!

--
Chris

Tim

unread,
Aug 28, 2008, 5:09:48 AM8/28/08
to
In message <1spcb4tdo176cj18h...@4ax.com>, T i m
<ne...@spaced.me.uk> writes

>On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:11:17 +0100, "Scraggy"
><scr...@abuseisgoodforyou.org.be> wrote:
>
>>Lady Nina wrote:
>>> After Krusty's post I wondered how many UKRM men would be checking for
>>> lumps.
>>
>><puzzled>
>>Why, when one owns a woman to do this sort of thing...?
>
>Indeed and mine used to 'examine' me when she was <ahem> down here
>anyway <weg>. Caring yes, 'romantic', no.

Weg? What is he doing down there? euuuggghghhhh brain bleach time.
--
Tim
http://www.pitfieldbeershop.co.uk/

T i m

unread,
Aug 28, 2008, 5:18:08 AM8/28/08
to
On 28 Aug 2008 08:59:13 GMT, "CT" <m...@christrollen.co.uk> wrote:

>T i m wrote:
>
>> She's still going through the change
>
>Jeez, not another one!

Fraid so, and for a good (well not good) few years so far.

I've lost count of number of times she's said "is it hot in here or is
it just me?" You would think the clue would be the rest of us sitting
in our coats.

Oh, and if she hasn't got a hand fan on her that seems to make her
worse (I've even been known to fabricate one out of *anything* when we
are out).

And when you do try and show a bit of closeness .. "get off, I'm
having a flush ... " (said in a loving way of course)?

I don't remember signing up for this ... ? :-(

T i m

unread,
Aug 28, 2008, 5:24:05 AM8/28/08
to
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:09:48 +0100, Tim <t...@nospam.osvif.demon.co.uk>
wrote:

;-)

No, this <weg> .. (I'm not that sort of boy)

http://www.netlingo.com/lookup.cfm?term=WEG

M J Carley

unread,
Aug 28, 2008, 5:32:29 AM8/28/08
to
In the referenced article, ukrm...@rosbif.org writes:

>I can't remember who it was, but some comedian remarked on this a few
>years ago. Apparently it was brought up that blokes should check
>their nuts every so often for lumps. His comment was that blokes
>_always_ have their hands on their sacks, so the medical advice was
>irrelevant.

>I wish I could remember who it was. He told the joke so much better.

Not the same guy, but worth seeing:

http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=Yrj1DmjhYNs
--
Differenza fra il rivoluzionaro e il cialtrone. Il rivoluzionario
rompe l'orologio e invece di presentarsi alle nove si presenta alle
nove meno cinque. Il cialtrone rompe l'orologio e si alza alle undici.
Michael Carley: http://people.bath.ac.uk/ensmjc/

Lady Nina

unread,
Aug 28, 2008, 6:01:01 AM8/28/08
to
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:18:08 +0100, T i m <ne...@spaced.me.uk> wrote:

>On 28 Aug 2008 08:59:13 GMT, "CT" <m...@christrollen.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>T i m wrote:
>>
>>> She's still going through the change
>>
>>Jeez, not another one!
>
>Fraid so, and for a good (well not good) few years so far.

Oh what a lovely whoosh.
--
Lady Nina

T i m

unread,
Aug 28, 2008, 6:21:47 AM8/28/08
to
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:01:01 +0100, Lady Nina <spam...@ntlworld.com>
wrote:

Go on then .. what did he mean (I'm new here and simple remember).

Scraggy

unread,
Aug 28, 2008, 6:26:58 AM8/28/08
to
Krusty wrote:

> Scraggy wrote:
>
>> Lady Nina wrote:
>>> After Krusty's post I wondered how many UKRM men would be checking
>>> for lumps.
>>
>> <puzzled>
>> Why, when one owns a woman to do this sort of thing...?
>
> <sobs>

<grins>

CT

unread,
Aug 28, 2008, 7:37:03 AM8/28/08
to
T i m wrote:

I was alluding to the fact that on ukrm "going through the change"
could, in all probability, mean something to do with gender
reassignment.

--
Chris

T i m

unread,
Aug 28, 2008, 7:42:25 AM8/28/08
to
On 28 Aug 2008 11:37:03 GMT, "CT" <m...@christrollen.co.uk> wrote:

>T i m wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:01:01 +0100, Lady Nina <spam...@ntlworld.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:18:08 +0100, T i m <ne...@spaced.me.uk> wrote:
>> >
>> >>On 28 Aug 2008 08:59:13 GMT, "CT" <m...@christrollen.co.uk> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > T i m wrote:
>> > > >
>> >>>> She's still going through the change
>> > > >
>> > > > Jeez, not another one!
>> > >
>> > > Fraid so, and for a good (well not good) few years so far.
>> >
>> > Oh what a lovely whoosh.
>>
>> Go on then .. what did he mean (I'm new here and simple remember).
>
>I was alluding to the fact that on ukrm "going through the change"
>could, in all probability, mean something to do with gender
>reassignment.

Ah, so it was fairly subtle, moreso if you weren't keeping up with the
nuances of the ot stuff and was mainly Lady Nina just showing off?
;-)

All the best (and thanks for the explanation CT)

T i m.

Cane

unread,
Aug 28, 2008, 7:58:04 AM8/28/08
to
On 28 Aug, 09:58, T i m <n...@spaced.me.uk> wrote:

> >> After Krusty's post I wondered how many UKRM men would be checking for
> >> lumps.
>
> ><puzzled>
> >Why, when one owns a woman to do this sort of thing...?
>
> Indeed and mine used to 'examine' me when she was <ahem> down here
> anyway <weg>. Caring yes, 'romantic', no.

That's as lovely as groping a woman then stopping with "Ooo, I've
found a lump!"

No wonder your sex life has shrivelled up.

Cane

unread,
Aug 28, 2008, 8:31:54 AM8/28/08
to
On 28 Aug, 10:09, Tim <t...@nospam.osvif.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> >>> After Krusty's post I wondered how many UKRM men would be checking for
> >>> lumps.
>
> >><puzzled>
> >>Why, when one owns a woman to do this sort of thing...?
>
> >Indeed and mine used to 'examine' me when she was <ahem> down here
> >anyway <weg>. Caring yes, 'romantic', no.
>
> Weg? What is he doing down there?

A romantic prostate exam?

T i m

unread,
Aug 28, 2008, 9:53:44 AM8/28/08
to
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:58:04 -0700 (PDT), Cane <Cane...@gmail.com>
wrote:

I'm not sure about the sort of women you grope Cane (would you be on
speaking terms with them at this stage, is it before they call the
Police etc?) but, along with what seems to be the common consensus
here, something mostly people should (and are ultimately grateful to)
know about (romantic or otherwise)?


>
>No wonder your sex life has shrivelled up.

No, that's just down to her going through the change .. (or menopause,
in case it confuses anyone). ;-)

I can actually have sex whenever I want it (with the wife of course
but not over the dining table [1]), I just choose not to (so much)
while she's not in 'the mood'. I just can't remember seeing this
clause on the wedding certificate? :-(

All the best ..

T i m

[1] We'd had a few drinks and forgot we were in a restaurant. (I'll
get me coat).

ogden

unread,
Aug 28, 2008, 10:09:50 AM8/28/08
to
T i m wrote:
> I can actually have sex whenever I want it (with the wife of course
> but not over the dining table [1]), I just choose not to (so much)
> while she's not in 'the mood'. I just can't remember seeing this
> clause on the wedding certificate? :-(

Paging cane and his questionable referrals.

--
ogden

GSXR750 K4
RGV250 VJ22

Cane

unread,
Aug 28, 2008, 12:03:25 PM8/28/08
to
On 28 Aug, 15:09, ogden <og...@pre.org> wrote:

> > I can actually have sex whenever I want it (with the wife of course
> > but not over the dining table [1]), I just choose not to (so much)
> > while she's not in 'the mood'. I just can't remember seeing this
> > clause on the wedding certificate? :-(
>
> Paging cane and his questionable referrals.

I'm sorry everyone. I never intended my post to prompt T i m to paint
this mental picture.

Grimly Curmudgeon

unread,
Aug 28, 2008, 1:02:16 PM8/28/08
to
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember T i m <ne...@spaced.me.uk> saying
something like:

>I can actually have sex whenever I want it (with the wife of course
>but not over the dining table [1]),

>[1] We'd had a few drinks and forgot we were in a restaurant.


Christ; I hope they threw a bucket of water over you.
--
Dave
GS850x2 XS650 SE6a

"It's a moron working with power tools.
How much more suspenseful can you get?"
- House

steve auvache

unread,
Aug 28, 2008, 1:48:24 PM8/28/08
to
In article <g96lmo$ei9$2...@registered.motzarella.org>, Grimly Curmudgeon
<grimly...@REMOVEgmail.com> writes

>We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
>drugs began to take hold. I remember T i m <ne...@spaced.me.uk> saying
>something like:
>
>>I can actually have sex whenever I want it (with the wife of course
>>but not over the dining table [1]),
>>[1] We'd had a few drinks and forgot we were in a restaurant.
>
>
>Christ; I hope they threw a bucket of water over you.

Euuwww that is so 20th century, these days it would be videoed and put
on utube

T i m

unread,
Aug 28, 2008, 2:55:45 PM8/28/08
to
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:02:16 +0100, Grimly Curmudgeon
<grimly...@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote:

>We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
>drugs began to take hold. I remember T i m <ne...@spaced.me.uk> saying
>something like:
>
>>I can actually have sex whenever I want it (with the wife of course
>>but not over the dining table [1]),
>>[1] We'd had a few drinks and forgot we were in a restaurant.
>
>
>Christ; I hope they threw a bucket of water over you.

Hehe

T i m

unread,
Aug 28, 2008, 3:04:37 PM8/28/08
to
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:03:25 -0700 (PDT), Cane <Cane...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On 28 Aug, 15:09, ogden <og...@pre.org> wrote:

Meh, I thought you were all 'lads' (even the girls)?

<sees mental picture> Ah, I get ya point ... :-(

Veggie Dave

unread,
Sep 9, 2008, 1:27:04 PM9/9/08
to
Lady Nina <spam...@ntlworld.com> wrote the following literary
masterpiece:

>Then an image of you all rummaging around popped into my head,
>in the sort of clarity that not even strong drugs and gin can wipe
>away.

Hmm, I better delete the e-mail I was sending you with the picture of me
checking then...

--
Veggie Dave
UKRMHRC#2 BOTAFOF#08
IQ 18 FILMS http://www.iq18films.com
POST PRODUCTION http://www.iq18films.co.uk
Toxic Shock Syndrome Gets More Girls Than Me

Lady Nina

unread,
Sep 9, 2008, 6:30:08 PM9/9/08
to
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 18:27:04 +0100, Veggie Dave <Veggie~Da...@127.0.0.1>
wrote:

>Lady Nina <spam...@ntlworld.com> wrote the following literary
>masterpiece:
>>Then an image of you all rummaging around popped into my head,
>>in the sort of clarity that not even strong drugs and gin can wipe
>>away.
>
>Hmm, I better delete the e-mail I was sending you with the picture of me
>checking then...

I'm off the opiates, I can't drink alcohol - spare me!
--
Lady Nina

0 new messages