Paging Ginge
Wik
At midnight, /he/ will have the material you asked for.
Bring gloves.
--
| Wik -UKRMHRC#10- 2000 ZX12R-A1 -DC#1 -'FOT#0 'FOF #39 - BOD#12 BOB#12
|# You don't believe me | "Experience is the worst teacher.
|That the scenery | It always gives the test first
|Could be a cold-blooded killer. | and the instruction afterward."
Ginge
> The incontinent baboon sleeps heavily in /Antwerp/, tonight.
>
> At midnight, /he/ will have the material you asked for.
>
> Bring gloves.
OK.
Newcastle: 2, Manchester City: 2
--
ginge [at] stopthevoices.org.uk :: Kawasaki ZRX1200R, Yamaha SZR660
JP
>> The incontinent baboon sleeps heavily in /Antwerp/, tonight.
>>
>> At midnight, /he/ will have the material you asked for.
>>
>> Bring gloves.
>
>OK.
>
>Newcastle: 2, Manchester City: 2
In womens tennis I always bet against the heterosexual
--
ST1100 Pan European (With optional Get out of Jail Free Card)
ZX9R E1 (Its Green and Clean) XTZ750 (Flying Banana)
"Leaner Meaner Janitorial Cleaner" IBW#5 NATC#1 MHP#1 MMJ#1
BotTOS#1 UKRMFBC#4 Kot HMC APOSTLE#11
Bear
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 17:43:52 +0100, Ginge <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>
> >> The incontinent baboon sleeps heavily in /Antwerp/, tonight.
> >>
> >> At midnight, /he/ will have the material you asked for.
> >>
> >> Bring gloves.
> >
> >OK.
> >
> >Newcastle: 2, Manchester City: 2
>
> In womens tennis I always bet against the heterosexual
You've dropped your phoney dog poop.
--
Bear
These are my own opinions, and not necessarily those of all Bears
"I was so much older then; I'm younger than that now"
Bear's Current Paw Track: Dust Junkies: "Movin' On (Mega Bubble Dub)"
Champ
wrote:
>In womens tennis I always bet against the heterosexual
..and now you're reduced to using Bear's comedy lines? Sheesh.
--
Champ : worse than Bonwick
GSX-R 1000, GPz 750 turbo, ZX7RR Endurance Racer
GYASB#0 BotToS#2 BOTAFO(T|F)#35 UKRMFBC#2 IHABWTMMJ#3 MCT#5 WG*#1 BONY#40 DFV#8 IbW#17 SBS#34
Racing : www.team-ukrm.com. Vanity Publishing : www.champ.org.uk
Bear
> On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 18:09:33 +0100, JP <jpheidi@claradotcodotuk>
> wrote:
>
> >In womens tennis I always bet against the heterosexual
>
> ..and now you're reduced to using Bear's comedy lines? Sheesh.
The last time anyone mentioned Top Secret around here, I believe it was
AndyR, followed closely by your good self, but of course I could be
wrong.
Ginge
> On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 18:09:33 +0100, JP <jpheidi@claradotcodotuk>
> wrote:
>
> >In womens tennis I always bet against the heterosexual
>
> ..and now you're reduced to using Bear's comedy lines? Sheesh.
Nope, that one's broken my secret squirrel encoder ring.
If you're going to join in these private *paging* type messages at least
remember to use the secret code we all agreed on, otherwise everyone may
understand.
Champ
<bastardUND...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Champ wibbled ...
>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 18:09:33 +0100, JP <jpheidi@claradotcodotuk>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In womens tennis I always bet against the heterosexual
>>
>> ..and now you're reduced to using Bear's comedy lines? Sheesh.
>
>The last time anyone mentioned Top Secret around here, I believe it was
>AndyR, followed closely by your good self, but of course I could be
>wrong.
Sorry, on this occasion I wasn't having a go - it's just recall that
line as one that I've heard you use in real life.
I can't actually recall using any Top Secret lines, but I may well
have just repeated stuff that I've heard other people say.
No, *you* are.
Bear
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 00:06:51 +0100, Bear
> <bastardUND...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >Champ wibbled ...
> >> On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 18:09:33 +0100, JP <jpheidi@claradotcodotuk>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In womens tennis I always bet against the heterosexual
> >>
> >> ..and now you're reduced to using Bear's comedy lines? Sheesh.
> >
> >The last time anyone mentioned Top Secret around here, I believe it was
> >AndyR, followed closely by your good self, but of course I could be
> >wrong.
>
> Sorry, on this occasion I wasn't having a go
Well FFS sort yourself out then ... I rely on you for quality abuse and
whinging about my good self and the service is pants ATM.
> - it's just recall that
> line as one that I've heard you use in real life.
>
> I can't actually recall using any Top Secret lines, but I may well
> have just repeated stuff that I've heard other people say.
>
> No, *you* are.
Pretextual sublimation and Marxist capitalism
1. Eco and subdialectic textual theory
The main theme of the works of Eco is not deappropriation, but
predeappropriation. A number of narratives concerning pretextual
sublimation exist.
In the works of Eco, a predominant concept is the concept of
neodeconstructivist reality. But Lacan uses the term 'subdialectic
textual theory' to denote the stasis, and hence the paradigm, of textual
class. The premise of preconstructivist socialism suggests that academe
is dead, but only if Foucault's critique of Marxist capitalism is valid;
if that is not the case, Sontag's model of pretextual sublimation is one
of "Lacanist obscurity", and thus part of the economy of consciousness.
In a sense, the characteristic theme of la Tournier's[1] analysis of
patriarchial objectivism is not construction, but neoconstruction. The
premise of Marxist capitalism states that truth is used to reinforce the
status quo.
Thus, the primary theme of the works of Eco is the bridge between sexual
identity and art. Many theories concerning a self-fulfilling whole may
be revealed. In a sense, the main theme of la Fournier's[2] critique of
Batailleist `powerful communication' is the difference between sexual
identity and language. In The Island of the Day Before, Eco affirms
subdialectic textual theory; in The Limits of Interpretation (Advances
in Semiotics), although, he analyses textual precultural theory.
Thus, the characteristic theme of the works of Eco is the rubicon of
dialectic society. Any number of situationisms concerning Marxist
capitalism exist.
2. Pretextual sublimation and Derridaist reading
The primary theme of Wilson's[3] analysis of Marxist capitalism is the
role of the writer as reader. In a sense, Foucault promotes the use of
Derridaist reading to challenge sexual identity. The subject is
interpolated into a pretextual sublimation that includes reality as a
totality.
In the works of Eco, a predominant concept is the distinction between
within and without. However, Sontag suggests the use of Lyotardist
narrative to attack sexism. McElwaine[4] implies that we have to choose
between Marxist capitalism and structural subcapitalist theory.
"Class is unattainable," says Derrida; however, according to Wilson[5] ,
it is not so much class that is unattainable, but rather the paradigm,
and subsequent dialectic, of class. Thus, Marx promotes the use of
cultural theory to modify and analyse class. Lyotard uses the term
'Marxist capitalism' to denote not, in fact, deconstructivism, but
postdeconstructivism.
If one examines Derridaist reading, one is faced with a choice: either
reject preconceptualist discourse or conclude that expression is a
product of the masses, given that sexuality is equal to language.
Therefore, the subject is contextualised into a pretextual sublimation
that includes sexuality as a reality. The main theme of the works of
Joyce is the common ground between sexual identity and society.
"Class is part of the meaninglessness of art," says Debord. In a sense,
Sartre uses the term 'Derridaist reading' to denote the paradigm, and
some would say the failure, of capitalist consciousness. The primary
theme of Pickett's[6] critique of neocultural libertarianism is a
mythopoetical paradox.
Therefore, Bataille uses the term 'pretextual sublimation' to denote not
materialism as such, but postmaterialism. The example of Marxist
capitalism intrinsic to Joyce's Finnegan's Wake is also evident in A
Portrait of the Artist As a Young Man, although in a more capitalist
sense.
However, Debord uses the term 'pretextual sublimation' to denote the
role of the poet as writer. If Marxist capitalism holds, the works of
Joyce are empowering.
But the main theme of the works of Joyce is the difference between
sexual identity and art. Several theories concerning a self-referential
totality may be discovered.
However, Reicher[7] states that we have to choose between pretextual
sublimation and patriarchialist feminism. Many dematerialisms concerning
Derridaist reading exist.
Therefore, the subject is interpolated into a neotextual theory that
includes narrativity as a whole. The figure/ground distinction prevalent
in Joyce's Dubliners emerges again in A Portrait of the Artist As a
Young Man.
However, Lacan suggests the use of pretextual sublimation to deconstruct
hierarchy. Constructivist narrative implies that the significance of the
poet is deconstruction.
3. Consensuses of defining characteristic
"Class is elitist," says Sartre; however, according to Hanfkopf[8] , it
is not so much class that is elitist, but rather the paradigm, and
therefore the stasis, of class. It could be said that a number of
discourses concerning the role of the writer as poet may be revealed.
Derrida's model of pretextual sublimation states that expression must
come from communication.
In the works of Spelling, a predominant concept is the concept of
subcapitalist culture. In a sense, the subject is contextualised into a
Derridaist reading that includes consciousness as a paradox. If Marxist
capitalism holds, we have to choose between pretextual sublimation and
the cultural paradigm of discourse.
Thus, many theories concerning Derridaist reading exist. In Charmed,
Spelling denies predialectic nationalism; in The Heights, however, he
reiterates Derridaist reading.
However, la Tournier[9] suggests that we have to choose between
materialist discourse and Baudrillardist simulation. The fatal flaw, and
subsequent genre, of Marxist capitalism depicted in Gaiman's Death: The
Time of Your Life is also evident in The Books of Magic, although in a
more mythopoetical sense.
Therefore, the characteristic theme of Cameron's[10] analysis of
Derridaist reading is a modern reality. Any number of discourses
concerning the dialectic, and eventually the stasis, of subtextual
sexual identity may be discovered.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
1. la Tournier, E. A. (1987) Reinventing Realism: Marxist capitalism and
pretextual sublimation. Panic Button Books
2. la Fournier, B. ed. (1970) Pretextual sublimation and Marxist
capitalism. Cambridge University Press
3. Wilson, P. M. B. (1993) The Narrative of Genre: Pretextual
sublimation, neocultural nationalism and nationalism. Loompanics
4. McElwaine, N. P. ed. (1982) Pretextual sublimation in the works of
Cage. And/Or Press
5. Wilson, N. J. C. (1997) The Meaninglessness of Sexual identity:
Pretextual sublimation in the works of Joyce. University of Georgia
Press
6. Pickett, W. ed. (1975) Marxist capitalism and pretextual sublimation.
Yale University Press
7. Reicher, L. O. (1991) The Meaninglessness of Reality: Pretextual
sublimation and Marxist capitalism. Schlangekraft
8. Hanfkopf, W. ed. (1975) Pretextual sublimation in the works of
Spelling. Oxford University Press
9. la Tournier, D. G. (1990) Deconstructing Socialist realism: Marxist
capitalism in the works of Gaiman. University of North Carolina Press
10. Cameron, J. ed. (1972) Marxist capitalism and pretextual
sublimation. Harvard University Press
Fight fire with fire, say I ;)
Platypus
>
<snip>
> Fight fire with fire, say I ;)
Did anyone else try to ROT-13 that?
--
Platypus
VN800 Drifter, R80RT
DIAABTCOD#2 GPOTHUF#19
BOTAFOS#6 BOTAFOT#89
BOB#1 SBS#35 ANORAK#18 TWA#15
Ace
wrote:
>Bear wrote:
>>
>
><snip>
>
>> Fight fire with fire, say I ;)
>
>Did anyone else try to ROT-13 that?
Err no, why would they?
--
Ace (bruce dot rogers at roche dot com)
GSX-R1000K3, CB400F2
BOTAFOT#3, SbS#2, UKRMMA#13, UKRMSPC#1, DFV#8, BOTCdV#1
Pip
>On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 03:31:35 +0100, Platypus <plat...@ukrm.org>
>wrote:
>
>>Bear wrote:
>>>
>><snip>
>>
>>> Fight fire with fire, say I ;)
>>
>>Did anyone else try to ROT-13 that?
>
>Err no, why would they?
Now _that_ is a definite Diamond Nine, that is. With smoke.
--
Pip, Hairy Gfedcker. RF 900RR, Ruff and Rattly.
WS* DFWAG#0 IbW#27* DIAABTCOD#15 GP#0 EKP FUB#4 MKA+E#3
ANORAK#8 MIRTTH#15 BOTAFOT/F#47/34a BONY#13 KotMIB# <space>
UKRMRM#14 TWA#2
Bear
> Now _that_ is a definite Diamond Nine, that is. With smoke.
ROTFLMAO
PS while boating on the Broads, I saw the Red Arrows practising ... very
impressive.
Ace
<bastardUND...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Pip wibbled ...
>
>> Now _that_ is a definite Diamond Nine, that is. With smoke.
>
>ROTFLMAO
>
>PS while boating on the Broads, I saw the Red Arrows practising ... very
>impressive.
I get the feeling I'm being whooshed, double-whooshed and now
treble-whooshed.
But I don't care - you lot can just go fuck youselves, mkay?
Badger
>
> PS while boating on the Broads, I saw the Red Arrows practising ... very
> impressive.
Multi-colour trails? Shapes drawn in the sky, ending with a heart &
arrow? I saw that the other day when they were at Duxford. I was
some 10 miles away and still had a near-perfect view of the results.
Impressive? There's an inadequacy about the word when it's applied to
precision control by several people of hundreds of tons of steel in
that way.
--
Rick
NT650V
TWA#11 BREast#6 BOTAFOT#139
Wik
> The last time anyone mentioned Top Secret around here, I believe it was
> AndyR, followed closely by your good self, but of course I could be wrong.
<waves>
Wik
[of the Red Arrows]
> hundreds of tons of steel in that way.
<anorak>
Umm, prolly nearer 50 tonnes, all up.
Max T/O weight of a Hawk T1 is ~8,500kg. For display purposes, I'd guess
nearer 4-5000kg.
</a>
Bear
Actually, TBH, I'm not *that* impressed ... it's shapes, and lines and
maneuvering, yes, and yes it's very impressive, but this is what they
*do* FFS ... and *all* they do ... they should be bloody good at it.
<but yes, it was great watching them ;)>
Bear
> On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 00:06:51 +0100, Bear yammered:
>
> > The last time anyone mentioned Top Secret around here, I believe it was
> > AndyR, followed closely by your good self, but of course I could be wrong.
>
> <waves>
Be quiet, Fromage.
Wik
> Wik wibbled ...
>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 00:06:51 +0100, Bear yammered:
>>
>> > The last time anyone mentioned Top Secret around here, I believe it
>> > was AndyR, followed closely by your good self, but of course I could
>> > be wrong.
>>
>> <waves>
>
> Be quiet, Fromage.
I'm not the first guy who fell in love with a girl he met in
a restaurant who then turned out to be the daughter of a kidnapped
scientist only to lose her to a childhood lover who she'd last seen on a
deserted island and who turned out fifteen years later to be the leader of
the French Underground.
Bear
> On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 22:15:22 +0100, Wik <Rik_...@hotmail.com> said
>
> >On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 20:40:39 +0100, Bear yammered:
> >
> >> Wik wibbled ...
> >>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 00:06:51 +0100, Bear yammered:
> >>>
> >>> > The last time anyone mentioned Top Secret around here, I believe it
> >>> > was AndyR, followed closely by your good self, but of course I could
> >>> > be wrong.
> >>>
> >>> <waves>
> >>
> >> Be quiet, Fromage.
> >
> >I'm not the first guy who fell in love with a girl he met in
> >a restaurant who then turned out to be the daughter of a kidnapped
> >scientist only to lose her to a childhood lover who she'd last seen on a
> >deserted island and who turned out fifteen years later to be the leader of
> >the French Underground.
>
Is this the potato farm?
Yes. I am Albert Potato.