Re: UKRM Torrent site down.
ogden
> Sorry folks, but I'll need to take this down, as the new French
> anti-piracy law is now in force.
>
> I'll try to set it up on an HTTPS connection when I get the chance, but
> it's a case of a round tuit.
>
> Anyone else willing to host this?
What does it need?
--
ogden
Simon Wilson
> Sorry folks, but I'll need to take this down, as the new French
> anti-piracy law is now in force.
>
> I'll try to set it up on an HTTPS connection when I get the chance, but
> it's a case of a round tuit.
>
> Anyone else willing to host this?
>
It's a private tracker though isn't it? IWHT highly unlikely for it to
be noticed by anyone.
Having your t'internet taken away would be a Bad Thing though I agree -
I wouldn't want to be the first.
--
/Simon
Cab
Urm, a webserver, a mysql database and PHP.
- php4.3x - php5.2.3
- mysql4 and mysql5
Check out torrenttrader.org for more info.
You can install the site using a basic setup and I can zip it all up (web pages
and d'base) for you to overwrite the basic setup.
I'll even set up a redirect to http://ukrm.info/torrent.
--
Cab :^) - "It's not a fookin' budgie, you daft tart!"
Z1000ABS : http://www.rosbif.org/ukrm (just for WUN)
The ALL NEW ukrm website : http://www.ukrm.info
email addy : ukrm_dot_cab_at_rosbif_dot_org
Cab
> Cab wrote:
>> Sorry folks, but I'll need to take this down, as the new French
>> anti-piracy law is now in force.
>>
>> I'll try to set it up on an HTTPS connection when I get the chance, but
>> it's a case of a round tuit.
>>
>> Anyone else willing to host this?
>>
>
> It's a private tracker though isn't it? IWHT highly unlikely for it to
> be noticed by anyone.
You're quite right. But there are people that don't like me on here that
would quite happily stitch me up. I don't want to give them ammunition.
Even if the files aren't on my own server.
> Having your t'internet taken away would be a Bad Thing though I agree -
> I wouldn't want to be the first.
Heh, me neither.
ogden
> On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 18:30:58 -0000, ogden wibbled:
> > Cab wrote:
> >> Sorry folks, but I'll need to take this down, as the new French
> >> anti-piracy law is now in force.
> >>
> >> I'll try to set it up on an HTTPS connection when I get the chance, but
> >> it's a case of a round tuit.
> >>
> >> Anyone else willing to host this?
> >
> > What does it need?
> >
>
> Urm, a webserver, a mysql database and PHP.
>
> - php4.3x - php5.2.3
> - mysql4 and mysql5
>
> Check out torrenttrader.org for more info.
OK, I've just set up a test install and it seems to work.
> You can install the site using a basic setup and I can zip it all up (web pages
> and d'base) for you to overwrite the basic setup.
Go for it.
P.
--
ogden
The Older Gentleman
> Krusty wrote:
>
> > Cab wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:38:54 +0000, Simon Wilson wibbled:
> > > > Cab wrote:
> > > >> Sorry folks, but I'll need to take this down, as the new French
> > > >> anti-piracy law is now in force.
> > > >
> > > > It's a private tracker though isn't it? IWHT highly unlikely for
> > > > it to be noticed by anyone.
> > >
> > > You're quite right. But there are people that don't like me on here
> > > that would quite happily stitch me up.
> >
> > <waves>
> >
> > Faux Froggie cunt.
>
> I'm not sure whether to take you seriously or not. I wasn't actually
> thinking of you.
I'd cheerfully drop you in it, if only for your mangling of the French
language.
--
BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F Triumph Street Triple
Suzuki TS250ER GN250 Damn, back to six bikes!
Try Googling before asking a damn silly question.
chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
des hanging around for a while
> On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:38:54 +0000, Simon Wilson wibbled:
>> Cab wrote:
>>> Sorry folks, but I'll need to take this down, as the new French
>>> anti-piracy law is now in force.
>>>
>>> I'll try to set it up on an HTTPS connection when I get the chance, but
>>> it's a case of a round tuit.
>>>
>>> Anyone else willing to host this?
>>>
>>
>> It's a private tracker though isn't it? IWHT highly unlikely for it to
>> be noticed by anyone.
>
> You're quite right. But there are people that don't like me on here that
> would quite happily stitch me up. I don't want to give them ammunition.
> Even if the files aren't on my own server.
I hope you're not referring to me. You'll note that whilst you thought it
a wheeze to relate my private life in e-mails and whilst pissed on a TOG
run, I know your address (if you're still in the same place), and have
never revealed that. Nor shall I.
Vindictive little shits are called 'Cab'; not 'Des'.
Cab
> Sorry folks, but I'll need to take this down, as the new French
> anti-piracy law is now in force.
>
> I'll try to set it up on an HTTPS connection when I get the chance, but
> it's a case of a round tuit.
>
> Anyone else willing to host this?
>
It's already back up, thanks to ogden. You can still get it here:
http://www.ukrm.info/torrent but you'll be redirected to ogden's page.
Logins, etc, don't change but torrents will need to be redownloaded to
be used.
The Older Gentleman
*CHOMP*
des hanging around for a while
> des hanging around for a while <d...@des.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2010-01-01, Cab <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:38:54 +0000, Simon Wilson wibbled:
>> >> Cab wrote:
>> >>> Sorry folks, but I'll need to take this down, as the new French
>> >>> anti-piracy law is now in force.
>> >>>
>> >>> I'll try to set it up on an HTTPS connection when I get the chance, but
>> >>> it's a case of a round tuit.
>> >>>
>> >>> Anyone else willing to host this?
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> It's a private tracker though isn't it? IWHT highly unlikely for it to
>> >> be noticed by anyone.
>> >
>> > You're quite right. But there are people that don't like me on here that
>> > would quite happily stitch me up. I don't want to give them ammunition.
>> > Even if the files aren't on my own server.
>>
>> I hope you're not referring to me. You'll note that whilst you thought it
>> a wheeze to relate my private life in e-mails and whilst pissed on a TOG
>> run, I know your address (if you're still in the same place), and have
>> never revealed that. Nor shall I.
>>
>> Vindictive little shits are called 'Cab'; not 'Des'.
>
> *CHOMP*
>
*sigh*
Neil, we both know he was writing in earnest.
Nige
> Krusty wrote:
>
>>>>> You're quite right. But there are people that don't like me on
>>>>> here that would quite happily stitch me up.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Faux Froggie cunt.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure whether to take you seriously or not.
>>
>>
>> Does that mean 2010 is the year when smileys become necessary? We've
>> never even disagreed on anything afaik!
>
> Heh, agreed.
>
> My bad. I've just become a bit parano when it comes to someone else on
> the NG.
Who?
--
Nige,
BMW K1200S
Honda Transalp XL600V
Yamaha R1
Range Rover Vogue
steve auvache
around for a while <d...@des.com> writes
Another language Cab has failed to master?
--
steve auvache
des hanging around for a while
*chortle*
The Older Gentleman
> >
> >Neil, we both know he was writing in earnest.
>
> Another language Cab has failed to master?
<VBG>
Ace
Older Gentleman) wrote:
>des hanging around for a while <d...@des.com> wrote:
>> Vindictive little shits are called 'Cab'; not 'Des'.
>
>*CHOMP*
Excellent. And this from the person who twice emailed complaints of
racism to someone's employer, based on an I-kike comment or two.
des hanging around for a while
I didn't e-mail them, you idiot; I faxed them. And your boss was very
pissed off that you were making anti-Semitic statements via the Internet,
on your company's time.
You were also stupid enough to make those statements whilst living in
France. You didn't know that such acts were criminal offences in France.
Did you expect to get away with it?
I note (with some sense of satisfaction, but no pleasure whatsoever) that
you started posting from iFrance just after that, and that you have been
very reticent about repeating your anti-Jewish rhetoric on UKRM since then.
Are you about to start again? Have you lost your job at Roche? If you
haven't and you start your nonsense again, I promise you: you will.
JackH
> On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:38:54 +0000, Simon Wilson wibbled:
>
> > Cab wrote:
> >> Sorry folks, but I'll need to take this down, as the new French
> >> anti-piracy law is now in force.
>
> >> I'll try to set it up on an HTTPS connection when I get the chance, but
> >> it's a case of a round tuit.
>
> >> Anyone else willing to host this?
>
> > It's a private tracker though isn't it? IWHT highly unlikely for it to
> > be noticed by anyone.
>
> You're quite right. But there are people that don't like me on here that
> would quite happily stitch me up. I don't want to give them ammunition.
> Even if the files aren't on my own server.
It comes to something when you feel you have to think like that.
However, in light of other posts made around these parts today, I can
see why you're thinking along those lines.
--
JackH
The Older Gentleman
> On 2010-01-02, Ace <b.ro...@ifrance.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 10:49:14 +0000, totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk (The
> > Older Gentleman) wrote:
> >
> >>des hanging around for a while <d...@des.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>> Vindictive little shits are called 'Cab'; not 'Des'.
> >>
> >>*CHOMP*
> >
> > Excellent. And this from the person who twice emailed complaints of
> > racism to someone's employer, based on an I-kike comment or two.
>
> I didn't e-mail them, you idiot; I faxed them. And your boss was very
> pissed off that you were making anti-Semitic statements via the Internet,
> on your company's time.
>
> You were also stupid enough to make those statements whilst living in
> France. You didn't know that such acts were criminal offences in France.
> Did you expect to get away with it?
>
> I note (with some sense of satisfaction, but no pleasure whatsoever) that
> you started posting from iFrance just after that, and that you have been
> very reticent about repeating your anti-Jewish rhetoric on UKRM since then.
> Are you about to start again? Have you lost your job at Roche? If you
> haven't and you start your nonsense again, I promise you: you will.
"Vindictive little shits are called 'Cab'; not 'Des'."
doetnietcomputeren
Gentleman) said:
>> I note (with some sense of satisfaction, but no pleasure whatsoever) that
>> you started posting from iFrance just after that, and that you have been
>> very reticent about repeating your anti-Jewish rhetoric on UKRM since then.
>> Are you about to start again? Have you lost your job at Roche? If you
>> haven't and you start your nonsense again, I promise you: you will.
>
> "Vindictive little shits are called 'Cab'; not 'Des'."
Heh. Nicely done. Hung by his own rope.
Of course, shortly there will be a string of reasons, excuses and
justifications, all nicely missing the point entirely.
--
Dnc
des hanging around for a while
> des hanging around for a while <d...@des.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2010-01-02, Ace <b.ro...@ifrance.com> wrote:
>> > On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 10:49:14 +0000, totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk (The
>> > Older Gentleman) wrote:
>> >
>> >>des hanging around for a while <d...@des.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >>> Vindictive little shits are called 'Cab'; not 'Des'.
>> >>
>> >>*CHOMP*
>> >
>> > Excellent. And this from the person who twice emailed complaints of
>> > racism to someone's employer, based on an I-kike comment or two.
>>
>> I didn't e-mail them, you idiot; I faxed them. And your boss was very
>> pissed off that you were making anti-Semitic statements via the Internet,
>> on your company's time.
>>
>> You were also stupid enough to make those statements whilst living in
>> France. You didn't know that such acts were criminal offences in France.
>> Did you expect to get away with it?
>>
>> I note (with some sense of satisfaction, but no pleasure whatsoever) that
>> you started posting from iFrance just after that, and that you have been
>> very reticent about repeating your anti-Jewish rhetoric on UKRM since then.
>> Are you about to start again? Have you lost your job at Roche? If you
>> haven't and you start your nonsense again, I promise you: you will.
>
> "Vindictive little shits are called 'Cab'; not 'Des'."
Yes, that's right. Because none of my actions were based on
'vindictiveness'. Rogers can (and has) called me any number of things, but
I only acted when he committed _a crime_. Hate speech is a criminal
offence in France. He broke the law, he paid the price (sort of).
Nothing to do with 'vindictiveness'.
HtH, HaND &c.
des hanging around for a while
> On 2010-01-03 00:25:01 +0100, totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk (The Older
> Gentleman) said:
>
>>> I note (with some sense of satisfaction, but no pleasure whatsoever) that
>>> you started posting from iFrance just after that, and that you have been
>>> very reticent about repeating your anti-Jewish rhetoric on UKRM since then.
>>> Are you about to start again? Have you lost your job at Roche? If you
>>> haven't and you start your nonsense again, I promise you: you will.
>>
>> "Vindictive little shits are called 'Cab'; not 'Des'."
>
> Heh. Nicely done. Hung by his own rope.
Humans are 'hanged', and the expression you're looking for is 'hoisted by
his own petard'.
> Of course, shortly there will be a string of reasons, excuses and
> justifications, all nicely missing the point entirely.
Not at all. Just the truth. I've never sought 'revenge' on anyone on UKRM
for what they've called me. But Bruce Rogers was stupid enough to - whilst
a resident of France - post anti-Semitic hate speech whilst at work. This
is a criminal offence in France. I asked him several times (in e-mail and
on UKRM) to stop. His response was to sneer on UKRM that I'd contacted
him. He didn't stop. Where hatred of Jews is concerned, I'm not very
tolerant; nor is my legendary sense of humour at all that enamoured of
people who post stuff like that. But if I'd really wanted to fuck him, I'd
have faxed the local nick in his town of residence. I didn't want to fuck
him - I wanted him to stop. I got him to stop, and he gets to go about his
business without an entry on the French Gendarmerie nationale computer.
I'd call that a win.
Not that this will matter to anyone here: certain members of .. erm, a
'group' on UKRM have impunity for anything. I'm reminded of the time when
the very same Bruce Rogers was involved in an accident in France. On a
road where the rule of 'priorité à droite' was in effect, he refused
priority to a motorist approaching from his right. Despite this, he blamed
the motorist for the accident, and this quite preposterous affirmation was
supported by Blaney (no surprise, there...) who was present, and by most
everyone else on UKRM.
'seems like it's always 'someone else's fault' where Ace is concerned.
Like he breaks the law, and it's always someone else's fault. I hope he
never murders anyone. I'll probably be banged up for it.
doetnietcomputeren
<d...@des.com> said:
>> Of course, shortly there will be a string of reasons, excuses and
>> justifications, all nicely missing the point entirely.
>
> Not at all.
And then you did.
--
Dnc
des hanging around for a while
ogden
> Not at all. Just the truth. I've never sought 'revenge' on anyone on UKRM
> a resident of France - post anti-Semitic hate speech whilst at work. This
> is a criminal offence in France.
But he doesn't work in France. He works in Switzerland where anti-
Semitic hate speech is all but mandatory.
--
ogden
des hanging around for a while
He lives in France. France subscribes to the legal theory of universal
competence - especially when it comes to hate speech. We're a little,
erm.. 'sensitive' when it comes to people who want to kill Jews.
The Older Gentleman
> France subscribes to the legal theory of universal
> competence - especially when it comes to hate speech. We're a little,
> erm.. 'sensitive' when it comes to people who want to kill Jews.
Amusing, considering how enthusiastically they participated in the
Holocaust.
des hanging around for a while
> des hanging around for a while <d...@des.com> wrote:
>
>> France subscribes to the legal theory of universal
>> competence - especially when it comes to hate speech. We're a little,
>> erm.. 'sensitive' when it comes to people who want to kill Jews.
>
> Amusing, considering how enthusiastically they participated in the
> Holocaust.
Not 'considering' - _because of_.
The Older Gentleman
> On 2010-01-03, The Older Gentleman <totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > des hanging around for a while <d...@des.com> wrote:
> >
> >> France subscribes to the legal theory of universal
> >> competence - especially when it comes to hate speech. We're a little,
> >> erm.. 'sensitive' when it comes to people who want to kill Jews.
> >
> > Amusing, considering how enthusiastically they participated in the
> > Holocaust.
>
> Not 'considering' - _because of_.
Actually, that's probably quite correct.
des hanging around for a while
> The Older Gentleman wrote:
>
>> des hanging around for a while <d...@des.com> wrote:
>>
>> > France subscribes to the legal theory of universal
>> > competence - especially when it comes to hate speech. We're a
>> > little, erm.. 'sensitive' when it comes to people who want to kill
>> > Jews.
>>
>> Amusing, considering how enthusiastically they participated in the
>> Holocaust.
>
> out. Again.
Ah, a new Clique SOP. Whenever anyone posts a follow-up to me, someone -
anyone - has to post immediately, setting it up as 'trolling'. So if I
post a response that defeats the person's point, the claim is, 'I was just
trolling'. If I _don't_ respond, no harm done and the original poster's
reputation is intact.
Nice. It could catch on.
Ace
Heh.
And just for the record, no, it didn't get me fired. The worst it did
was trigger an informal warning for posting during work time. But our
legal department were not well pleased at the time they'd had to waste
on such a petty-minded, patently false and vindictive, attack.
They would have been happy to support me in a court action against the
complainant, but I decided it just wasn't worth the hassle.
But seriously, trying to get someone fired from their job for calling
someone an "i-kike"? What sort of person would do that?
Dan L
Someone who can't differentiate between usenet and the real world. What
a petty minded and fucked up thing to have done.
--
Dan L on t'iPhone
des hanging around for a while
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 12:20:14 -0000, ogden <og...@pre.org> wrote:
>
>>des hanging around for a while wrote:
>>> Not at all. Just the truth. I've never sought 'revenge' on anyone on UKRM
>>> for what they've called me. But he was stupid enough to - whilst
>>> a resident of France - post anti-Semitic hate speech whilst at work. This
>>> is a criminal offence in France.
>>
>>But he doesn't work in France. He works in Switzerland where anti-
>>Semitic hate speech is all but mandatory.
>
> Heh.
>
> And just for the record, no, it didn't get me fired.
I didn't claim that it did.
> The worst it did was trigger an informal warning for posting during work
> time. But our legal department were not well pleased at the time they'd
> had to waste on such a petty-minded, patently false and vindictive,
> attack.
I rather suspect (judging by the two faxes that I still have on my Mac)
that they were very annoyed that their employee had been making
'unacceptable' (I quote) statements on the Internet.
Had they considered it 'petty-minded, patently false and vindictive', they
wouldn't even have bothered.
Or put more concisely: you're a liar.
> They would have been happy to support me in a court action against the
> complainant,
Oh, puhleeze...
> but I decided it just wasn't worth the hassle.
More likely, you decided that discretion was the better part of valour, and
that a talking-to from your boss was preferable to a talking-to from the
police.
But what would have been the nature of your complaint?
Oh, wait. You can't answer, 'cos you've got me killfiled, and so you can't
see, and well ... how convenient.
But let's look at the facts ..
1) an IP address that resolves to roche.com is used to post anti-Semitic
hate speech
2) I send (and keep copies of) several e-mails asking you to stop
3) I post several articles to UKRM in which I ask you to stop
4) rather than stopping, you brag on UKRM about how I've emailed you
5) you continue to use anti-Semitic slurs - again, almost proud of
yourself
So exactly what would have been your complaint, Bruce? That I 'faxed' your
boss? In what way is that illegal? In what way would I have been penally
or civilly responsible? You _did_ make those statements. Didn't you?
That much would have been easy to verify (and anyway, if your IP hadn't
been in there, your boss would never have bothered even calling you in), so
a libel case wouldn't have worked. Nor was faxing your company going to
cause me any grief, because I sent them from my own ADSL line, thus no
employer to whine that I used company time. Had you made a complaint,
however, I'd have just have brought your words to light, and you'd have
been laughed out of court.
(of course, I never did manage to verify whether you were in fact looking
for my address in Paris - that might have opened another can of worms, but
I'm out of your reach now, so we'll let that one pass....)
> But seriously, trying to get someone fired from their job for calling
> someone an "i-kike"? What sort of person would do that?
You're a liar, Bruce. You didn't just call me 'an i-kike'; you used the
word 'kike' and yid' to refer to other Jews. And .. *chuckle* ... the
remarkable thing is: it's _still_ 'someone else's fault'. It's never your
fault, eh? Poor baby. Everyone's bad to you.
I nailed you to the wall, Bruce. Now grow up, shut up, stop snivelling,
and take it like a man.
PS Gotcha.
des hanging around for a while
Oooooh, I dunno ... someone who'd threaten physical violence on another
poster for words written ... on Usenet? Or maybe someone who'd try to ruin
a teacher's life by accusing him of pædophilia, because he showed her up as
a fraud .. on Usenet?
Hmm. 'wonder who did that, eh..?