Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Layout drawing software

11 views
Skip to first unread message

Chris King

unread,
Feb 6, 2012, 6:10:33 PM2/6/12
to
Once you have your layout mapped out/designed/pinned down and points
all wired up for DCC, is there any good software (free or commercial)
that allows you to put this in the computer/PC and then mark up
points/turnouts (and dcc accessory numbers), signals (and dcc numbers)
etc. ?

Now my layout is done and before I add scenery etc, I want to knock up
a diagram/plan of the layout and then mark on it the points/turnouts
and which accessory number (for point changing) is which on the diagram
so I have a hard copy reference. Short of making marker posts with the
numbers on alongside each turnout/point.

I know hornby do a track designed for about £10, but its more dependant
on the piece numbers and cost when building it. Are there any other
alternatives?

--
Chris King
(remove nospam to email direct)

Chris Wilson

unread,
Feb 6, 2012, 6:17:41 PM2/6/12
to
I'm using "Anyrail" at the moment, only had it a month or two but it meets
my needs and it has a very easy learning curve. I don't do DCC but it does
have the ability to add notes etc on th eplans so it will probably serve
your purposes. Oh and there's a free try before you buy version.

http://www.anyrail.com/index_en.html

--

All the best,

Chris

Robert Heller

unread,
Feb 6, 2012, 7:33:46 PM2/6/12
to
XtrkCAD is free, runs on any operating system.

http://www.xtrkcad.org/

>

--
Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933
Deepwoods Software -- Download the Model Railroad System
http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows
hel...@deepsoft.com -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/

ray

unread,
Feb 6, 2012, 7:56:36 PM2/6/12
to
+1 on xtrkcad

manat...@hotmail.com

unread,
Feb 7, 2012, 4:04:12 AM2/7/12
to
For layout design yes, but for a control panel I would do something
more diagrammatic using something like GIMP http://www.gimp.org/ .

MBQ

Robert Heller

unread,
Feb 7, 2012, 9:15:43 AM2/7/12
to
At Tue, 7 Feb 2012 01:04:12 -0800 (PST) "manat...@hotmail.com" <manat...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Feb 7, 12:56=A0am, ray <r...@zianet.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:10:33 +0000, Chris King wrote:
> > > Once you have your layout mapped out/designed/pinned down and points al=
> l
> > > wired up for DCC, is there any good software (free or commercial) that
> > > allows you to put this in the computer/PC and then mark up
> > > points/turnouts (and dcc accessory numbers), signals (and dcc numbers)
> > > etc. ?
> >
> > > Now my layout is done and before I add scenery etc, I want to knock up =
> a
> > > diagram/plan of the layout and then mark on it the points/turnouts and
> > > which accessory number (for point changing) is which on the diagram so =
> I
> > > have a hard copy reference. Short of making marker posts with the
> > > numbers on alongside each turnout/point.
> >
> > > I know hornby do a track designed for about =A310, but its more dependa=
> nt
> > > on the piece numbers and cost when building it. Are there any other
> > > alternatives?
> >
> > +1 on xtrkcad
>
> For layout design yes, but for a control panel I would do something
> more diagrammatic using something like GIMP http://www.gimp.org/ .

xtrkcad does have available all of the bits and pieces to do a control
panel.

If you are into a computer controlled layout (eg Chubb CMR/I), the Model
Railroad System can do that.

>
> MBQ

manat...@hotmail.com

unread,
Feb 7, 2012, 10:51:40 AM2/7/12
to
On Feb 7, 2:15 pm, Robert Heller <hel...@deepsoft.com> wrote:
Yes, I know. It also has quite a steep learning curve which is why I
would not recommend it, unless the effort is useful to you for layout
design as well.

MBQ

Robert Heller

unread,
Feb 7, 2012, 1:57:15 PM2/7/12
to
At Tue, 7 Feb 2012 07:51:40 -0800 (PST) "manat...@hotmail.com" <manat...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Feb 7, 2:15=A0pm, Robert Heller <hel...@deepsoft.com> wrote:
> > At Tue, 7 Feb 2012 01:04:12 -0800 (PST) "manatba...@hotmail.com" <manatba=
> ...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Feb 7, 12:56=3DA0am, ray <r...@zianet.com> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:10:33 +0000, Chris King wrote:
> > > > > Once you have your layout mapped out/designed/pinned down and point=
> s al=3D
> > > l
> > > > > wired up for DCC, is there any good software (free or commercial) t=
> hat
> > > > > allows you to put this in the computer/PC and then mark up
> > > > > points/turnouts (and dcc accessory numbers), signals (and dcc numbe=
> rs)
> > > > > etc. ?
> >
> > > > > Now my layout is done and before I add scenery etc, I want to knock=
> up =3D
> > > a
> > > > > diagram/plan of the layout and then mark on it the points/turnouts =
> and
> > > > > which accessory number (for point changing) is which on the diagram=
> so =3D
> > > I
> > > > > have a hard copy reference. Short of making marker posts with the
> > > > > numbers on alongside each turnout/point.
> >
> > > > > I know hornby do a track designed for about =3DA310, but its more d=
> ependa=3D
> > > nt
> > > > > on the piece numbers and cost when building it. Are there any other
> > > > > alternatives?
> >
> > > > +1 on xtrkcad
> >
> > > For layout design yes, but for a control panel I would do something
> > > more diagrammatic using something like GIMPhttp://www.gimp.org/.
> >
> > xtrkcad does have available all of the bits and pieces to do a control
> > panel.
>
> Yes, I know. It also has quite a steep learning curve which is why I
> would not recommend it, unless the effort is useful to you for layout
> design as well.

In many ways, GIMP has just as steep a learning curve (and GIMP is really
horrible for CAD work anyway -- great for things like designing CD
labels or website artwork). I figured that once the OP figured out
laying track with xtrkcad, it would be fairly simple to move onto
designing the control panel(s)...

Darren

unread,
Feb 7, 2012, 2:03:31 PM2/7/12
to
Anyrail is fantastic. Highly recomended


On Feb 7, 6:57 pm, Robert Heller <hel...@deepsoft.com> wrote:
> At Tue, 7 Feb 2012 07:51:40 -0800 (PST) "manatba...@hotmail.com" <manatba...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 7, 2:15=A0pm, Robert Heller <hel...@deepsoft.com> wrote:
> > > At Tue, 7 Feb 2012 01:04:12 -0800 (PST) "manatba...@hotmail.com" <manatba=
> Deepwoods Software        -- Download the Model Railroad Systemhttp://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows
> hel...@deepsoft.com       --http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/

Graham Harrison

unread,
Feb 7, 2012, 5:32:46 PM2/7/12
to

"Darren" <ukmin...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d5f6acf0-280e-4380...@m2g2000vbc.googlegroups.com...
JMRI?

Graham Thurlwell

unread,
Feb 14, 2012, 7:46:36 AM2/14/12
to
On the 7 Feb 2012, Robert Heller <hel...@deepsoft.com> wrote:

<snip>

> In many ways, GIMP has just as steep a learning curve (and GIMP is really
> horrible for CAD work anyway -- great for things like designing CD
> labels or website artwork).

GIMP's mainly better for photo and bitmap work, for doing line art and
diagrams Inkscape is worth a look. http://www.inkscape.org - it's
free.


--
Jades' First Encounters Site - http://www.jades.org/ffe.htm
The best Frontier: First Encounters site on the Web.

nos...@jades.org /is/ a real email address!

Wolf K

unread,
Feb 14, 2012, 9:32:33 AM2/14/12
to
On 14/02/2012 7:46 AM, Graham Thurlwell wrote:
> On the 7 Feb 2012, Robert Heller<hel...@deepsoft.com> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> In many ways, GIMP has just as steep a learning curve (and GIMP is really
>> horrible for CAD work anyway -- great for things like designing CD
>> labels or website artwork).
>
> GIMP's mainly better for photo and bitmap work, for doing line art and
> diagrams Inkscape is worth a look. http://www.inkscape.org - it's
> free.

GIMP is an attempt to clone Photoshop functionality. It's spectacularly
successful in doing so, especially in the "steep learning curve", which
is code for "this is a textbook example of how to design the most
user-hostile interface possible".

Wolf K.

Robert Heller

unread,
Feb 14, 2012, 11:44:09 AM2/14/12
to
OTOH, a lot of what Photoshop is used for professionally can be pretty
complex (probably much more than what we 'amatures' really need). I
don't know if Photoshop has been suffering from the long term effects
of 'creeping featurism' with the result being that it has 'the most
user-hostile interface possible', which GIMP is trying its best to
clone, warts and all.

Inkscape also has a somewhat user-hostile interface, probably because it
is trying to clone Illustrator, which in turn probably suffers from
'creeping featurism' as well.

>
> Wolf K.
0 new messages