Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: new fishing forum

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Derek Moody

unread,
Jun 3, 2008, 7:18:15 PM6/3/08
to
In article <g238kc$57q$1$830f...@news.demon.co.uk>, wayne
<URL:mailto:wa...@bibles.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> we have started up a new forum which includes sections on shore sea fishing

Fascinating. A quick check shows over a hundred 'new forum' posts on urfs,
not so many on urfg but over 130 on urfc.

I wonder how many ever get a visitor, one or two must get some traffic but
given the hassle of using www interfaces I don't intend to investigate.

Cheerio,

--
Fishing: http://www.fishing.casterbridge.net/
Writing: http://www.author.casterbridge.net/derek-moody/
uk.rec.fishing.game Badge Page:
http://www.fishing.casterbridge.net/urfg/

Old Codger

unread,
Jun 6, 2008, 8:11:06 AM6/6/08
to
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 00:18:15 +0100, Derek Moody <derek...@clara.net>
wrote:

>In article <g238kc$57q$1$830f...@news.demon.co.uk>, wayne
><URL:mailto:wa...@bibles.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>> we have started up a new forum which includes sections on shore sea fishing
>
>Fascinating. A quick check shows over a hundred 'new forum' posts on urfs,
>not so many on urfg but over 130 on urfc.

Stop making figures up Moody. Not many of you gnomes know how to
write.

>I wonder how many ever get a visitor, one or two must get some traffic but
>given the hassle of using www interfaces I don't intend to investigate.

Looks like sitting on the side of a river looking like a gnome and
throwing loaves of bread at fish at a captive audience is not so much
fun any more? I suppose you still have your smutty websites to amuse
you but looking over your shoulder and waiting for the knock must be
quite tiresome!

0 new messages