I've finally set up my horse picture gallery; it's still very much in
it's infancy and there'll be a more pics from more venues added over
time but, for the time being, I'd be grateful if anyone could have a
look and give me some feedback (either here in the ng or by e-mail if
you prefer; mind the spam trap!) . Particularly, if anyone has a high
speed connection, I'd be interested to know if the huge size of the
PNGs is worth the quality improvement over the JPGs; I have my doubts
and they took me ages to upload!
The gallery is at http://www.horsefly.free-online.co.uk
Cheers!
Steve Smith
Spam trap in use - Do not hit Reply
The correct e-mail address should be fairly obvious
Steve Smith wrote:
> II'd be interested to know if the huge size of the
> PNGs is worth the quality improvement over the JPGs; I have my doubts
> and they took me ages to upload!
>
> The gallery is at http://www.horsefly.free-online.co.uk
>
Hi Steve,
Nice pictures but you were right to doubt, I couldn't see any difference
between the 2 filetypes.
Also I couldn't get the one of the Winsofrd Hill Herd Stallion (URL not
found)
Hope this helps
Sue
> Hi Steve,
> Nice pictures but you were right to doubt, I couldn't see any difference
> between the 2 filetypes.
> Also I couldn't get the one of the Winsofrd Hill Herd Stallion (URL not
> found)
> Hope this helps
> Sue
I found all the piccies but like Sue, I couldn't see any discernible
difference between the 2 filetypes (viewed on a Mac). The story behind
the Exmoor foal and the stallion is funny though!
Thank you both for trying. General comments on free-online is that
websites hosted there can be a bit hit-or-miss, though they seem to
have got there act together now. Whenever I try it, it all comes up
OK. I think I will dump the PNG files, though!
Thanks again
Steve Smith
Take care,
Steve