The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling
From: PhilO <goo18...@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 06:47:40 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Oct 4 2012 9:47 am
Subject: Re: Cycling Safer than Walking?
On Thursday, October 4, 2012 11:10:52 AM UTC+1, Scion wrote:
I'll go along with that. "About as safe as walking" is my view of cycling.
> Yerbut I don't think it helps to say "cycling is safer than walking > because KSI per mile travelled is less" when KSI per hour may well be > more. "Cycling is generally no more dangerous than walking" might be a > better angle, then there's less reason getting bogged down in stats trying > to prove one is "safer" than the other. Unfortunately, People like Judith insist on posting figures that show only the dangers of cycling. I respond with figures to balance the picture. This whole threas started with such a posting from Judith. She knows the figure intimately, but chooses to post only those that imply cycling may be dangerous. I'm just trying to provide a little balance. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||