Also, how do you think urcm's going? Do you see yourself posting there
much in the future? Do you think it's right that MattB's posts are
being routinely delayed and censored simply because he dares to post
facts about anti-motorist measures that the car-haters would rather
pretend weren't true? Doesn't that indicate that those who thought from
the beginning that urcm was about censorship of such viewpoints were
right all along?
Doesn't it also indicate just how aware the car-haters are that the
facts regarding road safety aren't on their side and the only way they
can not be humiliatingly outdebated is by censoring, ignoring and/or
insulting the opposition so that they don't have to address their points
properly? Also, aren't people who knowingly post nonsense about road
safety in order to further a "hidden" agenda of theirs utter scum who
are prepared for road users to DIE just so that they can piss off
motorists? Don't you find that reprehensible? How can you defend such
people while simultaneously lecturing Judith and me and pretending to be
the "voice of reason" who's so much better and wiser than we are? If
you were really so reasonable and really such a great bloke then you
would think that deliberately distorting the road safety effort just to
make things harder for motorists was diabolical behaviour.
I think I've made my point Nobby. Much for you to think about here.
Unlike many of the regulars here, I can see that you're a decent person
who's been blinded by anti-motorist rhetoric and dogma, rather than
genuinely evil and dishonest like Chapman and co. There's hope for you
yet Nobby.
Bobby
--
Louis Genou
Empereur sans portfolio
As for the shite you posted, Nuxxy,
- I don't know, and more importantly don't give a shit whether Chapman
posted as Lou Knee.
- I think URCM's going fine. It's a pity there are a small number of
moaners, and as I've said I can't really see why they are moaning
given they voted against the group in the first place. I do and
will continue to post there if I see fit. I'm perfectly happy to
see Matt's posts scrutinised heavily, he's an inveterate bore with
an agenda and an aversion to listening to others, he can have a taste
of his own medicine for all I care.
- I doubt you'd recognise a fact regarding road safety if you crashed into
one. Also, I'm sorry you've mistaken my postings to you and your shrivelled
cunt as lectures - they're not meant to be.
- There is no hope for me thinking of you as anything more than a piece of
shit, Nuxxy. Frankly, I wouldn't weep a single tear if you were killed
by one of those murderous speed cameras you are so opposed to. That would
be an irony I could live with.
- I look forward as ever to hear about the legal action you promised against
Chapman. Of course, you won't actually do it, like everything that foams
from your mouth, it's bullshit. It makes you feel big in a small world,
doesn't it, while you sit there in your darkened room designing web
pages while mummy stands outside the door keeping the real world at bay?
Nobby
<childish rant and bullshit snipped>
> Nobby
Silly Prick!
Why can't the hypocritical tossers (AKA URCM mods) piss off back to
their own place?
Eh? I'm not a URCM mod! Mind you, bit of a laugh you calling something
a childish rant or bullshit, either wot I or wot Nuxxy spewed :-)
Nobby
How is it "stalking" someone to address a thread to them? You wouldn't
say it was "stalking" if one of your car-hating buddies FAOed another
one through a usenet thread (say because the addressee was too much of a
gutless coward to disclose their real email address).
If I was going round replying to all your posts in every thread then you
might have a point (which I know would be unusual for you).
Unfortunately you're not that special to me Nobby (just highly amusing
in various unintentional ways...you brighten up the dreary URC
experience immeasurably...no-one could possibly accuse you of being one
of the shit-boring robotic clone car-haters. It just shows that there's
an exception to every rule: there really is such a thing as an
interesting and individual car-hater who can think for themselves and is
capable of being honest and sincere, at least sometimes).
> As for the shite you posted, Nuxxy,
Sorry, who? If that bloody light switch isn't fixed soon then someone's
going to break their neck.
> - I don't know, and more importantly don't give a shit whether Chapman
> posted as Lou Knee.
You *do* know it was him. That's a LIE. If you really don't give a
shit, why bother lying? If it really "doesn't matter" then why don't he
and/or his sycophants just admit it was him and move on? We're hardly
going to keep asking whether Chapman posted as Lou Knee *after* he
admits it, are we?
And if you're going to keep taking the moral high ground then being
dishonest isn't very good. I mean, it's not unusual by any means, but
you can't run a country on outdated Bohemian mysticism.
> - I think URCM's going fine. It's a pity there are a small number of
> moaners, and as I've said I can't really see why they are moaning
> given they voted against the group in the first place. I do and
> will continue to post there if I see fit. I'm perfectly happy to
> see Matt's posts scrutinised heavily, he's an inveterate bore with
> an agenda and an aversion to listening to others, he can have a taste
> of his own medicine for all I care.
What you mean is that you don't like him posting inconvenient truths
which you don't want to be reminded of. You know you won't be able to
stop him doing it by outdebating him (because you know he's right), so
the only alternative open to you is to try to stop him posting in the
first place by playing dirty.
But what I don't get is: If you know he's right, why do you continue to
hold the opposite point of view (which by definition you must know to be
wrong)? Are you that arrogant that you will never put your hands up and
say "I was wrong" about anything? Thank goodness everyone isn't like
that...if Einstein, Newton, Darwin and co had taken the attitude that
"My first theory about everything is automatically right and so I'm
never going to revise what I think about anything, no matter what
evidence is presented to me", we'd be in an even worse state than we
currently are.
Just admit that speed cameras don't work (and the other sensible things
that MattB says), accept that you were wrong and learn from it. I'm
quite happy to do the same thing when I realise I've been wrong about
something (which of course I am at times). It's for my own good in the
end - and yours. Much better to suffer momentary humiliation (if indeed
you even do) than to refuse to learn from experience and therefore
remain ignorant. You keep banging on about age as if you're always
right because you're old, but if you refuse to learn from life then
you're not benefitting in any way from your advancing years...you've
just got all the downsides of aging while still remaining childish.
> - I doubt you'd recognise a fact regarding road safety if you crashed into
> one.
Yeah, you see, silly generalised slurs, because you know that if you
start going into specifics then you'll lose very quickly. *None* of you
car-haters are *ever* prepared to have a fair, uncensored, reasoned
debate with your opponents, because you know damn well you wouldn't
stand a chance in hell.
> Also, I'm sorry you've mistaken my postings to you and your
> shrivelled cunt as lectures - they're not meant to be.
Course not. And don't you think that calling people things like
"shrivelled cunt" makes you rather twisted? It's the sort of bitter, "I
hate the world"-type language that's used by people who have a lot of
issues. Do you have issues, Nobsmegma?
> - There is no hope for me thinking of you as anything more than a piece of
> shit, Nuxxy. Frankly, I wouldn't weep a single tear if you were killed
> by one of those murderous speed cameras you are so opposed to. That would
> be an irony I could live with.
I tend to see it as a sign that I'm doing something right when a
dishonest car-hater says they dislike me. Oh, and well done for showing
how much you really care about road safety.
Really though Nobby, you go round calling people mad when the real irony
is that you're more unhinged than virtually anyone. Funny unhinged
rather than irritating unhinged, mind you (as long as I never have to
meet you in person of course...that would be beyond a joke).
> - I look forward as ever to hear about the legal action you promised against
> Chapman.
I think you've got me confused with someone else. Has Chapman broken
the law? If so, don't you think he should be brought to justice? Or
are you another "If Chapman does it then it's automatically fine" type?
> Of course, you won't actually do it, like everything that foams
> from your mouth, it's bullshit. It makes you feel big in a small world,
> doesn't it, while you sit there in your darkened room designing web
> pages while mummy stands outside the door keeping the real world at bay?
You got me. (Of course, again it's ironic in that you keep saying that
sort of thing to me to make yourself feel big, because presumably being
made to look foolish by someone younger than you makes you feel
insecure. It is however flattering that you keep making out that I'm so
young when I'm actually mere months away from 30. Do please keep it
coming. BTW most people who meet me in the flesh think I'm
older...funny old world, eh Gobby Nobby?)
> It is however flattering that you keep making out that I'm so
> young when I'm actually mere months away from 30.
Doesn't matter how old you claim to be, you're still a cunt.
--
Louis Genou
Conqueror of Italy
But special enough for you to waste your time writing about a hundred lines
of drivel all because I hurt your feelings!
> It is however flattering that you keep making out that I'm so
> young when I'm actually mere months away from 30. Do please keep it
> coming. BTW most people who meet me in the flesh think I'm
> older...
Oh Nuxxy, nearly 30 now? Wow, aren't you a big boy? So grown up too!
I bet Mummy's really proud of her boy! Bet she doesn't know what you
get up to in your bedroom with your computer though - she'd be sooooo
disappointed.
The Nobster xx
Who?
> > Unfortunately you're not that special to me Nobby ...
>
> But special enough for you to waste your time writing about a hundred lines
> of drivel all because I hurt your feelings!
Actually, Noreen, I was just goading you for my own amusement. But
sadly you're not biting, probably because you found my points too near
the bone and too difficult to answer (in other words the usual
explanation for a URC car-hater calling a post "drivel"...if you search
your idol Chapman's posts for that word then you'll find that almost
every post is an example of exactly that).
Damn it. I'm going to have to find some other car-hating loony to wind
up now. I know I shouldn't mock the afflicted but can you honestly say
that you've never derived amusement from poking fun at the more
colourfully fuckwitted (sorry, "disadvantaged") members of society?
Talking of which, I wish Glug would come back (again). You're nothing
compared to him in the "unintentionally extremely funny" stakes.
> > It is however flattering that you keep making out that I'm so
> > young when I'm actually mere months away from 30. Do please keep it
> > coming. BTW most people who meet me in the flesh think I'm
> > older...
>
> Oh Nuxxy, nearly 30 now? Wow, aren't you a big boy? So grown up too!
> I bet Mummy's really proud of her boy! Bet she doesn't know what you
> get up to in your bedroom with your computer though - she'd be sooooo
> disappointed.
You really do have problems and some worrying fixations, don't you?
Were you abused as a child?
> The Nobster xx
Only 2 kisses? Actually, try removing them and the 4 letters before
them for a more accurate sign-off.
--
A DIFFERENT Nobby Anderson