I'm thinking about buying a new bike, and I'm looking for some advice...
Most of my cycling is short-distance urban commuting (just over 3 miles each way, in Cambridge so pretty flat), but I'd also like my bike to be something that I'd be happier to go longer distances on (I sold my car this morning so bike/PT is it for transport).
Things I definitely want:
* hub gears * at least 5 gears (I have the trad. Sturmey-Archer 3 speed at the moment, and while it's OK in town I'd like a lower gear for hills without having to sacrifice the high end) * hub dynamo * mudguards * rack * not suspension
I don't much like straight handlebars (not enough variation in hand position on longer rides) but I dunno whether I'd get on with drop bars either (not having ridden any bikes with them). I suppose there's always moustache bars :-)
My budget is limited not so much by how much I can afford to spend as by the point at which I don't feel comfortable leaving the bike locked up in the street (perhaps you can convince me that this is excessive caution or suggest a cheap insurer). I don't want to give a figure yet because I'm really not sure what kind of price my feature list implies.
Online shops don't seem to do useful things like "show me only hub gear bikes" so it's hard to find ones which match without spending ages wading through irrelevancy :-(
So can anybody suggest: * where I might find bikes that meet these criteria * anything else I ought to think about
> I'm thinking about buying a new bike, and I'm looking for some > advice...
> Most of my cycling is short-distance urban commuting (just over 3 > miles each way, in Cambridge so pretty flat), but I'd also like > my bike to be something that I'd be happier to go longer distances > on (I sold my car this morning so bike/PT is it for transport). ... > My budget is limited not so much by how much I can afford to spend as > by the point at which I don't feel comfortable leaving the bike locked > up in the street (perhaps you can convince me that this is excessive > caution or suggest a cheap insurer). I don't want to give a figure yet > because I'm really not sure what kind of price my feature list implies.
Sounds like the answer could well be two bikes - a cheaper one for round-town use, and a nicer one for distance. Say shimano kit - hub 'mo, nexus 8, flat bars, etc for the town bike so you're happy to leave it locked up on the street, and something more comfortable for the distance stuff.
On Dec 1, 10:07 pm, Peter Maydell <pmayd...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> Most of my cycling is short-distance urban commuting (just over 3 > miles each way, in Cambridge so pretty flat), but I'd also like > my bike to be something that I'd be happier to go longer distances > on (I sold my car this morning so bike/PT is it for transport).
> Things I definitely want:
> * hub gears > * at least 5 gears > * hub dynamo > * mudguards > * rack > * not suspension
I have a Carrera Subway 8 that fits most things on your list, but it is too heavy for long distance stuff. I bought it as a low maintenance commuter for a 3 mile each way commute and it is now in its third winter. I only use it when the weather is damp or worse (I skate in nice weather), but this is NE Scotland, so it gets plenty of use. In that time I have had to tighten the chain once. I have not had to replace or adjust anything in over two years! Comes with mudguards, full front & rear rack mounting points, 8 gears, no suspension (has a suspension seatpost I've replaced to take a tagalong and not noticed any difference). No hub dynamo, though. As for the bars, I've fitted long bent bar-ends which give a few extra positions, but then I don't usually use it for long rides.
I'd highly recommend it as a bombproof bike for a three mile commute. You can take a great big lock with you and not notice the increase in weight (yes, the bike is that heavy). Great for just using, though. No hassle at all.
Peter Maydell wrote: > So can anybody suggest: > * where I might find bikes that meet these criteria > * anything else I ought to think about
A Brompton, of course :-) Srsly, hub gears, mudguards, pannier, rack, hub dynamo, lights, noodle bars option, PT friendly and no need to leave it on the street at all.
> I'm thinking about buying a new bike, and I'm looking for some > advice... > Things I definitely want:
> * hub gears > * at least 5 gears (I have the trad. Sturmey-Archer 3 speed at the > moment, and while it's OK in town I'd like a lower gear for hills > without having to sacrifice the high end) > * hub dynamo > * mudguards > * rack > * not suspension
Carrera Subway 8, from Halfords, is the easy option, though no dynamo. To get the hub dynamo included, Bikefix in London have the Farhrrad Manufaktur range - from memory, the T100 would suit.
Limited hub geared options available from Giant, Specialized, and I think Ridgeback and Cannondale. When I looked into this properly all the above were using the Shimano Nexus 8 (Halfords use the premium version, don't hink the others do). Haven't seen anyone fitting the SRAM iMotion, but I haven't been looking hard.
All the above have flattish bars (I think the Bikefix one may be more moustache-y): if you want drops without having to tinker yourself, then I think St John St Cycles are your best option, though they'd probably want you to spend thousands on a Rohloff hub.
Rack will probably be extra whatever you choose but frames for hub gears normally also have rack eyelets. None of the above are going to be especially sporty.
> I'm thinking about buying a new bike, and I'm looking for some > advice...
> Most of my cycling is short-distance urban commuting (just over 3 > miles each way, in Cambridge so pretty flat), but I'd also like > my bike to be something that I'd be happier to go longer distances > on (I sold my car this morning so bike/PT is it for transport).
> Things I definitely want:
> * hub gears > * at least 5 gears (I have the trad. Sturmey-Archer 3 speed at the > moment, and while it's OK in town I'd like a lower gear for hills > without having to sacrifice the high end) > * hub dynamo > * mudguards > * rack > * not suspension
> I don't much like straight handlebars (not enough variation in hand > position on longer rides) but I dunno whether I'd get on with drop > bars either (not having ridden any bikes with them). I suppose there's > always moustache bars :-)
> My budget is limited not so much by how much I can afford to spend as > by the point at which I don't feel comfortable leaving the bike locked > up in the street (perhaps you can convince me that this is excessive > caution or suggest a cheap insurer). I don't want to give a figure yet > because I'm really not sure what kind of price my feature list implies.
> Online shops don't seem to do useful things like "show me only > hub gear bikes" so it's hard to find ones which match without > spending ages wading through irrelevancy :-(
> So can anybody suggest: > * where I might find bikes that meet these criteria > * anything else I ought to think about
> Thanks! > -- PMM
I expect my offer to the topic is too expensive but I have had my Thorn Raven Tour for just over 2 years now.
So it cost £1700 ish with all the things you mention. Of course the Rohloff hub is the expensive part of it coming in at £650 to £750ish but I have never regretted it!
I have " butterfly" handlebars which are comfortable for my annual cycle camping tours. I find straight bars too uncomfortable and I have too many years behind me for drops. ( I think the SJS don't recommend drops and they were not keen on me wanting "butterfly" bars but I find them suiting me and I have no problem with controls at all)
So more much of its year it just does my routine trundling -- sort of just like commuting -- but not going to work! I tow a trailer when I go out shopping and I am hardly a speed freak! On tour it carries a load very well!
Things I like about it 1 It is virtually maintenance free -- an oil change at least once a year. Then a monthly wash down and light oiling of the chain ( to be honest this is usually a 2 month + performance). It is great on tour nor to have to keep cleaning the chain and gear of the derailleur system every day. 2. It is not a "flash" looking bike. Mine is a darkish red and I think it just looks sort of ordinary and doesn't flaunt itself. Mind you I don't ;eave it unattended for longer than I can even when locked up. It is also fitted with a bike alarm -- just to give a scare to would be tealeafs! 3. In 8000 miles it has not let me down once. 4. The all steel frame gives a secure comfortable ride and it has survived a few knocks probably somewhat better than its rider. 5. It is very polite and always hums to me when I am working hard in a low gear under full load! -- So I may often swear at myself but never at my velocepanther!( well not where she can hear me). 6 There is then the unquantifiable asset that we slotted together on day one and have worked as a team ever since. My last new bike took me over a month to come to terms with and it did have a habit of misbehaving when I least expected it. I suppose that SJS Cycles do "size" it to you and it shows.
The only real "anti" point I have found is that I put a new chain on at about the 18 month point. When I bought it I had expected to get a much better life out of the chain -- less stressing than the derailleur gears but last April I found it necessary to fit a new chain. And I have just taken up the slack last week. So I would expect to have to put a new chain on before I set out for Berlin next June. I think Tom Crispin has experienced the same thing on his Thorn.
Although a bit expensive I think it is a hugely successful everyday bike that can cope with all that I ask it to do.
By the way Thorn don't do "trial rides" but do offer a 100 day no quibble return if not satisfied -- although I actually tried one out at the London Cycle show in October 2006
On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 03:40:53 GMT, "Trevor A Panther"
<ta...@NOSPAMblueyonder.co.uk> wrote: >By the way Thorn don't do "trial rides" but do offer a 100 day no quibble >return if not satisfied -- although I actually tried one out at the London >Cycle show in October 2006
I second the Thorn Raven Tour. An outstanding bike.
> I'm thinking about buying a new bike, and I'm looking for some > advice...
> Most of my cycling is short-distance urban commuting (just over 3 > miles each way, in Cambridge so pretty flat), but I'd also like > my bike to be something that I'd be happier to go longer distances > on (I sold my car this morning so bike/PT is it for transport).
> Things I definitely want:
> * hub gears > * at least 5 gears (I have the trad. Sturmey-Archer 3 speed at the > moment, and while it's OK in town I'd like a lower gear for hills > without having to sacrifice the high end) > * hub dynamo > * mudguards > * rack > * not suspension
> I don't much like straight handlebars (not enough variation in hand > position on longer rides) but I dunno whether I'd get on with drop > bars either (not having ridden any bikes with them). I suppose there's > always moustache bars :-)
> My budget is limited not so much by how much I can afford to spend as > by the point at which I don't feel comfortable leaving the bike locked > up in the street (perhaps you can convince me that this is excessive > caution or suggest a cheap insurer). I don't want to give a figure yet > because I'm really not sure what kind of price my feature list implies.
> Online shops don't seem to do useful things like "show me only > hub gear bikes" so it's hard to find ones which match without > spending ages wading through irrelevancy :-(
> So can anybody suggest: > * where I might find bikes that meet these criteria > * anything else I ought to think about
> Thanks! > -- PMM
Go to Station Cycles they have a good range of European bikes which will include Dynamo chaincase and hub brakes.
Then go to University cycles in Victoria avenue and see Colin, he will supply what you want even if he has to obtain it direct from Holland, and at a much better price and better service than other cycle shops
> * hub gears > * at least 5 gears (I have the trad. Sturmey-Archer 3 speed at the > moment, and while it's OK in town I'd like a lower gear for hills > without having to sacrifice the high end) > * hub dynamo > * mudguards > * rack > * not suspension
Specialised Globe City 3.1 was what Roos had for her birthday with pretty much the same list as you have there.
That has an RRP of £800, IIRC the successor model is less but has lower range dynohub and gear hub (both are Shimano 8s) and has lost the carbon fork, so not so nice a ride and stuff will ear out quicker. The model shown still seems to be available after a quick Google.
Not as nice as the Thorn Raven, but that is a bit over-specified for the job.
> I don't much like straight handlebars (not enough variation in hand > position on longer rides) but I dunno whether I'd get on with drop > bars either (not having ridden any bikes with them). I suppose there's > always moustache bars :-)
As you can see, the Globe has curved back bars, not straight, not moustache. The hand position thing is mostly a problem on a bike with a pronounced crouch in the riding position because that's what throws your weight onto your hands. Sit up straighter, which this sort of bike allows, and it's less of an issue. OTOH you do catch the wind more. You can always fit something like Cane Creek ergo bar-ends if you want, but I'd wait to see if it's a problem before you solve it.
http://kinetics.org.uk/html/spirit.shtml has an 8 speed hub as a factory option if you want. There is suspension though, but designed for the road rather than just sticking a MTB fork on a road bike suspension can be a Good Thing.
Another outre, though less outre, alternative with proper road-going suspension that makes the bike more rather than less efficient would be the Pashley/Moulton TSR 8 (http://www.tsr.uk.com/bikes/tsr8.php). Mudguards and racks are standard options and anyone who'd sell you one (e.g., Biketrax) will probably be happy to put in a dynohub.
The latter two are probably less prone to thievery because they're very unusual and hence harder to sell on and easier to trace (though I recall one thread in the past about a stolen Spirit, but it was recovered).
But for a "normal" bike, the Globe seems to do what you want.
Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net p.j.cli...@dundee.ac.uk http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/
In article <L7s*pG...@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>, Peter Maydell wrote: >miles each way, in Cambridge so pretty flat), but I'd also like [...] >My budget is limited not so much by how much I can afford to spend as >by the point at which I don't feel comfortable leaving the bike locked >up in the street (perhaps you can convince me that this is excessive >caution or suggest a cheap insurer).
Peter Maydell wrote: > ... or suggest a cheap insurer
I'd missed that the first time. Specialist cycle insurance tends to be insanely expensive IME. OTOH, depending on your specific policy and insurer your house contents insurance may well cover it at no extra cost. For example, one of the reasons we use M&S is it insures bikes up to £4K as default and doesn't seem to be burdened by stupid caveats like "only when set immovably in ferro-concrete within you home".
So, check your policy, and if it doesn't cover bikes up to the appropriate value think seriously about changing come renewal time.
Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net p.j.cli...@dundee.ac.uk http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/
Peter Maydell wrote: > I'm thinking about buying a new bike, and I'm looking for some > advice...
> Most of my cycling is short-distance urban commuting (just over 3 > miles each way, in Cambridge so pretty flat), but I'd also like > my bike to be something that I'd be happier to go longer distances > on (I sold my car this morning so bike/PT is it for transport).
> Things I definitely want:
> * hub gears > * at least 5 gears (I have the trad. Sturmey-Archer 3 speed at the > moment, and while it's OK in town I'd like a lower gear for hills > without having to sacrifice the high end) > * hub dynamo > * mudguards > * rack > * not suspension
> I don't much like straight handlebars (not enough variation in hand > position on longer rides) but I dunno whether I'd get on with drop > bars either (not having ridden any bikes with them). I suppose there's > always moustache bars :-)
> My budget is limited not so much by how much I can afford to spend as > by the point at which I don't feel comfortable leaving the bike locked > up in the street (perhaps you can convince me that this is excessive > caution or suggest a cheap insurer). I don't want to give a figure yet > because I'm really not sure what kind of price my feature list implies.
> Online shops don't seem to do useful things like "show me only > hub gear bikes" so it's hard to find ones which match without > spending ages wading through irrelevancy :-(
A couple of suggestions to look at: Ridgeback Nemesis with the Shimano Nexus 8 speed hub and hub brakes. Charge Tap - Nexus 8 speed again, but faster. Touring bikes make good commuters too, and some web sites have touring bike sections.
> So can anybody suggest: > * where I might find bikes that meet these criteria
A good local bike shop (if you have one), or the internet if you can tell from measurements whether a bike will fit you or not when you've unpacked, assembled and adjusted it.
> * anything else I ought to think about
The hub dynamo (and lights), mudguards and rack are things which are usually sold as add-ons. Don't write off a bike you like just because the standard spec doesn't include these. The dynamo hub combined with hub brakes is rare on any new bike, and there are cost implications to adding a dynamo to a bike which already has hub brakes, but you haven't mentioned hub brakes as a requirement. Hub gears and drop bars aren't a very well supported combination.
> I'm thinking about buying a new bike, and I'm looking for some > advice...
[snip] > Things I definitely want:
> * hub gears > * at least 5 gears (I have the trad. Sturmey-Archer 3 speed at the > moment, and while it's OK in town I'd like a lower gear for hills > without having to sacrifice the high end) [snip]
> My budget is limited not so much by how much I can afford to spend as > by the point at which I don't feel comfortable leaving the bike locked > up in the street (perhaps you can convince me that this is excessive > caution or suggest a cheap insurer). I don't want to give a figure yet > because I'm really not sure what kind of price my feature list implies.
[snip]
I was going to say how much I like my Rohloff Speed 14 hub gears but then I saw the bit about not wishing to feel uncomfortable leaving the bike locked up around Cambridge.
;-)
Mike -- o/ \\ // |\ ,_ o Mike Clark <\__,\\ // __o | \ / /\, "A mountain climbing, cycling, skiing, "> || _`\<,_ |__\ \> | reader in immunology, antibody engineer and ` || (_)/ (_) | \corn computer user"
In article <2238e56e-5d57-43f8-af16-649d2c668...@l39g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, TimB wrote: > Peter Maydell <pmayd...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
>> > I'm thinking about buying a new bike, and I'm looking for some >> > advice...
>If you want more local advice, try cam.transport (which is essentially >a cyclists' group)
No, it's often a group for cyclists and motorists who are clueless about cycling to argue about cyclists, with a bit of trainspotting. (This is not to suggest that all or most motorists are clueless about cycling, but the clueful ones are less likely to argue with the cyclists about cycling.)
It is a good place to get local advice from Cambridge cyclists, but anyone who thinks it is essentially a cyclists' group may well be surprised.
Clive George <cl...@xxxx-x.fsnet.co.uk> wrote: >Sounds like the answer could well be two bikes - a cheaper one for >round-town use, and a nicer one for distance. Say shimano kit - hub 'mo, >nexus 8, flat bars, etc for the town bike so you're happy to leave it locked >up on the street, and something more comfortable for the distance stuff.
This doesn't really appeal as a solution -- I don't see the point in spending money on a nice bike and then spending most of your time in the saddle riding something else. I'll keep the old bike for the "leave outside the station over the weekend" kind of situation, but if I can't at least do things with the new bike like commute to work or leave it outside pizza express for a few hours then it really isn't actually worth owning.
Peter Maydell <pmayd...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes: > This doesn't really appeal as a solution -- I don't see the point > in spending money on a nice bike and then spending most of your > time in the saddle riding something else. I'll keep the old bike
Obviously if you don't see the appeal then it's not worth it to you. For a counterexample, I quite like doing it this way because every time I *do* use the nice bike I am surprised all over again by how much lighter, faster, and more fun it is to ride. But YMM and in this case evidently does V
On Dec 2, 8:05 pm, Peter Maydell <pmayd...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> Clive George <cl...@xxxx-x.fsnet.co.uk> wrote: > >Sounds like the answer could well be two bikes - a cheaper one for > >round-town use, and a nicer one for distance. Say shimano kit - hub 'mo, > >nexus 8, flat bars, etc for the town bike so you're happy to leave it locked > >up on the street, and something more comfortable for the distance stuff.
> This doesn't really appeal as a solution -- I don't see the point > in spending money on a nice bike and then spending most of your > time in the saddle riding something else. I'll keep the old bike > for the "leave outside the station over the weekend" kind of > situation, but if I can't at least do things with the new bike > like commute to work or leave it outside pizza express for a few > hours then it really isn't actually worth owning.
> -- PMM
But you used to run a car - do you have any notion how much cheaper it is to run two bikes compared to running even the crappiest car in the world? In fact, logically, anyone who used to spend thousands a year running a car ought to be able to think of a bike as a disposable item. Yet it always amazes me that people think a few hundred is a lot to spend on a bike. Remember, no fuel, no tax, no insurance etc etc (more or less). Tim
In article <7e67db15-4eed-4208-8c68-1b62e183e...@f20g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>,
TimB <timburf...@onetel.net> wrote: >On Dec 2, 8:05 pm, Peter Maydell <pmayd...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> >wrote: >> Clive George <cl...@xxxx-x.fsnet.co.uk> wrote: >> >Sounds like the answer could well be two bikes - a cheaper one for >> >round-town use, and a nicer one for distance.
>> This doesn't really appeal as a solution -- I don't see the point >> in spending money on a nice bike and then spending most of your >> time in the saddle riding something else. >But you used to run a car - do you have any notion how much cheaper it >is to run two bikes compared to running even the crappiest car in the >world?
My point was not "I don't want to spend lots of money on a nice bike" but "I don't want to spend lots of money on a nice bike _and then not ride it_". (And also "I don't want to spend lots of money on a nice bike and then have it stolen after three months.")
(FWIW, my estimate about how much I was spending on the car in a year was about GBP550 fixed costs plus GBP450 depreciation plus GBP550 petrol. http://pm215.livejournal.com/81354.html Hey, I could buy a Raven Tour for that :-))
>In fact, logically, anyone who used to spend thousands a year >running a car ought to be able to think of a bike as a disposable >item.
Am I likely to have a bike stolen once every three months, once a year or once every five years? Anybody got a feel for that?
jsabine <j...@sabine.org.uk> wrote: >Carrera Subway 8 [..] Farhrrad Manufaktur range [..] Giant, Specialized >[..] Ridgeback and Cannondale.
Thanks for those pointers (and indeed to everybody else who suggested something) -- I now have a number of possibilities to go and think about for a bit.
>The hub dynamo (and lights), mudguards and rack are things which are >usually sold as add-ons. Don't write off a bike you like just because >the standard spec doesn't include these.
I agree with this generally; I guess I put most of that in as a sort of pointer to the kind of bike I wanted.
(I'm a bit boggled by mudguards being options on any vaguely commuter bike, but perhaps lots of people like the mud-spatter look?)
Can I assume that any frame will support having mudguards/rack attached, or do I need to look for ones which specifically have the right attachment points?
Also presumably if you get the hub dynamo as an addon you're effectively paying twice for wheel building...
>but you haven't mentioned hub brakes as a requirement.
This is because I don't have strong opinions on brake types. (My only experience of hub brakes is with a rather poor band brake on a rented bike in Japan, but I am assuming this isn't typical :-))
Peter Maydell wrote: > Jim Price <d1vers...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> The hub dynamo (and lights), mudguards and rack are things which are >> usually sold as add-ons. Don't write off a bike you like just because >> the standard spec doesn't include these.
> I agree with this generally; I guess I put most of that in as a sort > of pointer to the kind of bike I wanted.
> (I'm a bit boggled by mudguards being options on any vaguely commuter > bike, but perhaps lots of people like the mud-spatter look?)
It's not unknown for the manufacturer to spec mudguards on a commuter bike but then have the bike shop fail to display or fit them for customers. Put it down to the same reason bikes are classified on ebay as sporting equipment rather than vehicles.
> Can I assume that any frame will support having mudguards/rack > attached, or do I need to look for ones which specifically have > the right attachment points?
In general it is possible to attach mudguards to pretty much any normal looking bike, but some bike manufacturers make it more difficult than others. Anything sold as a tourer should be easy, and any mountain bike style frame will have the clearance once the knobbly tyres have been replaced with something suitable for commuting (unless your commute is through all year round mud). Faster bikes may well have less clearance and an absence of mounting points, but there are mudguards designed to work with those constraints. Don't be talked into mudguards which only cover a small proportion of the wheel - they may look nice, but they won't be very effective.
> Also presumably if you get the hub dynamo as an addon you're > effectively paying twice for wheel building...
Yes, but getting a good hub dynamo built by someone who knows what they're doing will result in a wheel of much higher quality than usually found on complete bikes. Have them re-tension the rear while you're at it, as that might not be optimal on a new bike. If it's a good bike shop they should do the wheelbuilding for free if you purchase the bike and all the bits from them. If they can't do it, they slip down a notch on the good bike shop scale.
>> but you haven't mentioned hub brakes as a requirement.
> This is because I don't have strong opinions on brake types. > (My only experience of hub brakes is with a rather poor band brake > on a rented bike in Japan, but I am assuming this isn't typical :-))
I put the need for maximum braking performance above the need for low maintenance, so I don't have any hub brakes, I have well maintained conventional rim brakes. Consider hub brakes if you are going to ride a lot in harsh conditions and/or want a long service interval, but try them out before you buy in case you don't think they perform well enough for your liking.
On Dec 3, 7:25 am, Peter Maydell <pmayd...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> Am I likely to have a bike stolen once every three months, once > a year or once every five years? Anybody got a feel for that?
Once every 5 years should be a generous estimate, assuming you don't do really silly things with it. How often were you planning on leaving it outside in town centres overnight?
Even the specialist insurance premiums that everyone rightfully decries as bad value are generally only about 10-15% of the value. At that price, you may as well just put the money towards a few bike. OTOH it is annoying when it happens, especially if you have put a lot of effort into setting it up just right with dynamos and stuff. So for that reason alone a beater bike may be worth having (although even then you will probably want to have it in good order).
IMO a lot depends on the exact location and nature of your workplace parking which you haven't elaborated on.
>IMO a lot depends on the exact location and nature of your workplace >parking which you haven't elaborated on.
Good point. The pattern of use is what's important. Eg workplace could be secure enough for a nice bike, town ok if you're not leaving it long with a big lock, outside the cinema could justify a beater bike. Use the nice bike for most stuff, use the beater when you think you're likely to be leaving it somewhere more iffy.
james.an...@gmail.com <james.an...@gmail.com> wrote: >IMO a lot depends on the exact location and nature of your workplace >parking which you haven't elaborated on.
Good point. Fairly well-used covered sheffield-stand racks in the company car park on a business park. They're right opposite the windows of the HR department, so I think you'd have to be a pretty bold thief to start in with the bolt cutters. They feel fairly safe to me.