On 28/05/2013 06:14, Justin Lewis wrote:
> On Sun, 26 May 2013 20:15:58 +0100, Dave- Cyclists VORP
> Dave, you turned up to neither venue - both were easily identifiable.
>
> Dover: I had just disembarked from a boat you claimed did not exist.
> In Waterloo Crescent I was searching for your white sign written van
> (apparently I should have been shitting myself ha ha ha , although I
> was looking forward to your childlike flailing attempt to avoid
> injury). We did not see your van, although there was a grey van
> outside the hotel.
You expect us to believe you noticed a grey van, but apparently didn't
notice that all the signage along the front of the hotel had completely
changed?
You were not there - stop wriggling
>
> MT: I stopped on the way from Harwich to Hertfordshire, parked in the
> hotel's car park and went in and used their toilets. I also took one
> of their folders regarding prices with me. Again no Dave.
I called the hotel, idiot. They had never heard of you.
You have changed your story again, you claimed you were staying there.
Now you have been caught out, you claim you only used the toilets.
You were not there - stop wriggling.
>
> You will now write: "You weren't there." You have no way of knowing
> (you cannot know that which is incorrect) that and as such it is an
> assertion you cannot support. That is the end of the matter. You
> should not have shat out.
So, if you were at Dover, explain how you and your passenger completely
failed to notice that the Churchill Hotel didn't exist anymore - despite
being prompted several times to confirm the venue?
You were not there - stop wriggling
>
> Now, do you have the bravery to turn up at Harwich? Obviously not.
>
Another fantasy of yours, idiot.