And so we turn to the question of why he made the Lou Knee post where he
called another poster a "piece of shit". Why did he not just post as
himself? Was he trying to make it seem like there was more support for
his position than there actually was? I can't see any other logical
reason for him pretending to be someone else when he made that post,
although it is Chapman we're talking about, so logic may very well not
come into it at all. (After all, it's not logical to hate motorists.)
It's time for him to stop evading the question. He seems to think he
can please his "God" without having to be honest by simply refusing to
say whether he posted as Lou Knee. Well, somehow, if "God" existed then
I don't think he'd be as easily deceived: "He" would know that Chapman
was still taking the soft option by not fessing up, and that whether or
not he actually lied about it was more or less irrelevant, and he'd
probably be more angry with Chapman for taking "Him" for a gullible fool
(like Chapman does with *everyone*) than he would have been had Chapman
just lied and denied making the post. So Chapman fails. Again. As
always.
Let's see if he's learnt anything yet, shall we? Guy Chapman, here's
your chance to redeem yourself: Did you make the Lou Knee post where you
called another poster a "piece of shit"? You *must* answer.
> Has Guy Chapman ever posted as Lou Knee?
Has Nuxxy ever posted as Guy Chapman?
>Has Nuxxy ever posted as Guy Chapman?
And The Reverend Tom Crispinson and Polly Parrot and dozens of others.
Guy
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/urc
GPG public key at http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/pgp-public-key.txt
Go away, you piece of shit. This is tedious beyond belief now.
--
Mr. Nasty
If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten
Ha ha. If you really think it's tedious then the best way of stopping
all discussion on it is to get Chapman to answer the question. But
you're obviously too much of a grovelling, pathetic sycophant of his to
do that (in fact you're clearly so embarrassed by being putty in his
hands that you've tried to hide who you are).
Of course, you could be Chapman himself. Either way you're a fuckwit
who contributes towards the problems on URC by being one of the braying
morons who refuses to ever accept that Chapman's wrong about anything,
no matter how obvious it is.
You can talk. At least there's a proper reason why I post here. You
have none that I can see, you just enjoy complaining about *everyone's*
posts.
Hi Guy. Have you ever posted as Lou Knee? How come you won't answer
that question?
Nice one. Jumping to your car-hating messiah's defence once again I
see. Do you take lessons from him on being a lying car-hating question-
evading fuckwit after your daily worship sessions? (You did say you'd
met him...presumably that's why?)
Well, Reverend Tom Nuxxy Crispinson. I did not see that as jumping to the
defence as such. I just thought that I would point out the irony of someone
asking if someone else has ever posted as someone else, when that person
habitually posts as someone else IYSWIM.
And, no, I have never met Guy, though I'm sure we would have much to chat
about :-)
I think your OP shows your state of self-delusion.
May I have your attention please?
May I have your attention please?
Will the real Lou Knee please stand up?
I repeat, will the real Lou Knee please stand up?
We're gonna have a problem here..
'Cause I'm Lou Knee, yes I'm the real Knee
All you other Lou Knees are just imitating
So won't the real Lou Knee please stand up,
please stand up, please stand up? . . .
And every single person is a Lou Knee lurkin . . .
Guess there's a Lou Knee in all of us
Fuck it, let's all stand up
apols to Mr Mathers
--
Its never too late to reinvent the bicycle
Ah, go on -- tell us the 'proper' reason.
Then tell us who you are instead of being a big chicken.
Chicken shit from someone too chicken to post as themselves.
Hiding behind mummy's apron and shouting at strangers is no way to behave.
Still posting as a coward, you big chicken.
> In article <7lnnhtF...@mid.individual.net>, he...@there.com says...
>>
>> Go away, you piece of shit. This is tedious beyond belief now.
>
> Ha ha.
Yes, we're laughing at you, you tedious prick.
Mike P
> In article <hd68i9$t86$2...@aioe.org>, ha...@munday.com says...
>>
>> Dear Rev.
>> You really need to get yourself a life. Seeing a Doctor might be a good
>> first step.
>> HTH.
>> Happi
>
> You can talk. At least there's a proper reason why I post here.
Could you enlighten us what it is then please?
Mike P
> In article <7lnnhtF...@mid.individual.net>, he...@there.com says...
>>
>> Go away, you piece of shit. This is tedious beyond belief now.
>
> Ha ha. If you really think it's tedious then the best way of stopping
> all discussion on it is to get Chapman to answer the question. But
> you're obviously too much of a grovelling, pathetic sycophant of his to
> do that (in fact you're clearly so embarrassed by being putty in his
> hands that you've tried to hide who you are)
Wrong. I couldn't care less whether Chapman, or anyone else for that
matter, called someone a "piece of shit" on usenet. It's usenet. It
happens. You clearly aren't mature enough to cope with this simple fact.
I think he's getting to you - either that or you're another who needs to
see a doctor tomorrow.
Happi.
Nah, it's just another version of the 'Spartacus' thang a few weeks back
hth