"kailblue" <pr001...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:0fMo7.24819$N01.1...@news1.cableinet.net...
TT ;-))
kailblue <pr001...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:0fMo7.24819$N01.1...@news1.cableinet.net...
> As for interconnects i again made my own from " Shark " cable & gold
> plated phono plugs from Maplin , ( £7.00 per 1m length ) ,couldn't hear
> any difference at all from a mates' Van de Hull ( £265/m ) ,Nordost (
> £380/m ) & Ixos 1004 (£20 per pair ).
FWIW I tend to use the 'low loss UHF, TV or Satellite' types of 75 Ohm coax
as interconnects. Typically less than 1 UKP/metre. I also use the
gold-plated Maplin phonos as they seem quite decent, and only a few quid
each. Been using these items for years and they seem fine to me. In the
past I did try comparing them with some more expensive leads, but didn't
hear anything that made me feel it was worth spending any more.
My own view is that people should at least consider starting out with
cables like the above. The are cheap enough that even if you don't like
them for some reason, you haven't wasted much money. They also give the
satisfaction of building your own, made to the right lengths.
Slainte,
Jim
--
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scots_Guide/intro/electron.htm
MMWaves http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scots_Guide/MMWave/Index.html
Armstrong Audio http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/Audio/armstrong.html
Barbirolli Soc. http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/JBSoc/JBSoc.html
"kailblue" <pr001...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:FF1p7.32083$N01.2...@news1.cableinet.net...
Griffin <expressli...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:9o30aq$lri$1...@plutonium.btinternet.com...
Gold plating has to be 24ct if you think about it!
>
snip
>
--
Ashley Booth
ICQ 74 74 32 33
"This is not a pipe: '|' "
d
_____________________________
Telecommunications consultant
http://www.pearce.uk.com
"kailblue" <pr001...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:0fMo7.24819$N01.1...@news1.cableinet.net...
I've thought about it - but I'm not sure if you mean:
1) Anything less than 24ct is not pure gold and therefore would result
in gold *alloy* plating
or
2) There is some reason that lower-purity gold (alloy) isn't used for
plating purposes.
Just curious.
--
Nick Hadlow
Drop DROPTHIS as appropriate for email address.
I would be interested to hear more details. What model of signal generator
and scope did you use? How was the distortion measured, and what level did
it reach? What were the details of the signal and load, and the measurement
setup? Can you also explain how your test conditions compare with those
that apply when the cable is used for its normal purpose?
I have never encountered a mains *cable* producing measureable distortion.
I have encountered imperfect joints that do. However even there, in
practical situations I have not encountered any significant effects.
You say "the expensive mains cables". Are you referring to specific brands
or makes and indicating that these have a distortion problem which standard
mains leads do not? If so, and your measurements are correct, then perhaps
you should publish all the details for others to judge.
> To the ear this gives the effect of a doubling of frequency which many
> people percieve as more detail in the music.
Are you saying this occurs as a result of mains harmonic creation? If so, I
have not experienced this. Can you say what amplifiers, etc, you used to
perceive this? (Or is your comment a generalised opinion?) In my experience
the PSU of most well-built amplifiers, etc, will essentially prevent the
normal levels of mains 'distortions' from reaching the actual amplifier
output. More details of your measurements, please, as I am interested.
> Of course it is merely second harmonic distortion. In fact, if you use
> an old cotton covered electric iron flex with two knots tied in
> opposition, any rectification effects will be too low for accurate
> measurements and there will be a vast improvement in the transparency of
> the music.
Again, I would be interested to learn the details of your measurements that
support what you say. Why do you mention 'knots' here? Are you assuming
they play a role? If so, what?
> I would be interested to hear more details.
Wooooooooooooooosh?
--
* Virtual reality is its own reward*
Dave Plowman dave....@argonet.co.uk London SW 12
RIP Acorn
Gold plating is an electro-chemical process and the plating has to be
pure gold. Look up the theory.
--
Ashley Booth
ICQ 74 74 32 33 www.snglinks.com
good point but how thick is the gold plating? if it's very thin it's
pointless.
Why is that? I thought the point of gold plating was to prevent
oxodation spoiling the contact.
Unless, of course, the gold was so thin it wore off!
John
regards
Welly
" evans" <ce001...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:5O8p7.34890$N01.2...@news1.cableinet.net...