UK next ? ........
Jimbo GM4DHJ ...
Yeti
Jimbo GM4DHJ ...
"Yeti" <ye...@ayrshore.com> wrote in message
news:hda5d4$vi8$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
stuff that .....
Jimbo GM4DHJ ...
"Jimbo GM4DHJ ..." <jim.g...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:hda5eq$1vb$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
Brian Reay
Indeed. In fact, why not make it a criminal offence not to register a phone.
(Spike, if you invent a dilemma over this, figure it out yourself- your
dilemma, your problem.)
--
73
Brian G8OSN/W8OSN
www.g8osn.net
Chris
> "Yeti" <ye...@ayrshore.com> wrote in message
> news:hda5d4$vi8$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>> Jimbo GM4DHJ ... wrote:
>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/09/spanish_mobiles/
>>
>> Why not?
>
> Indeed. In fact, why not make it a criminal offence not to register a phone.
Because there is no good reason to, and English Common Law is based on
being permissive not proscriptive.
Have you registered *Every* radio transmittor you own? Built? Borrowed? The
sheer bureaucracy of a registration scheme is invariably, with the exeption
of things like firearms just not worth it.
luc...@eternal-flames.gov
<ng...@chris-street.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>Have you registered *Every* radio transmittor you own? Built? Borrowed? The
>sheer bureaucracy of a registration scheme is invariably, with the exeption
>of things like firearms just not worth it.
You are Gordon Brown and I claim my five pounds.
Jimbo GM4DHJ ...
"Brian Reay" <seewe...@invalid.com> wrote in message
news:0u1Km.8058$dM3....@newsfe05.ams2...
> "Yeti" <ye...@ayrshore.com> wrote in message
> news:hda5d4$vi8$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>> Jimbo GM4DHJ ... wrote:
>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/09/spanish_mobiles/
>>
>> Why not?
>
> Indeed. In fact, why not make it a criminal offence not to register a
> phone.
>
why allow postings here without ID .......
luc...@eternal-flames.gov
<jim.g...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>why allow postings here without ID .......
Why allow Brian?
Ian Jackson
Morrison <b...@fenrir.org.uk> writes
>On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 23:21:43 -0000
>"Brian Reay" <seewe...@invalid.com> wrote:
>
>> Indeed. In fact, why not make it a criminal offence not to register a phone.
>
>not doing anything wrong of course.
>
It will come. One day, to buy anything, you will need an ID card (or
implanted RFID) with the appropriate level of authorisation.
Registration of anything which the state requires to be registered will
be automatic. It will be very difficult to be a criminal in the new
Utopia.
--
Ian
Spike
Brian Reay wrote:
I see you're struggling with the concept of 'dilemma', perhaps that
explains why you have difficulty recognising one, even when explained
in simple terms, and why you made the rather revealing remark above.
HTH.
--
from
Aero Spike
Not a member of the RSGB for 50 years 1959 - 2009
G1LVN
wrote:
> In message <20091109234345.2f7cd...@peterson.fenrir.org.uk>, Brian
>
> >> Indeed. In fact, why not make it a criminal offence not to register a phone.
>
> >Because you'd create a lot of criminals who are people that are actually
> >not doing anything wrong of course.
>
> It will come. One day, to buy anything, you will need an ID card (or
> implanted RFID) with the appropriate level of authorisation.
> Registration of anything which the state requires to be registered will
> be automatic. It will be very difficult to be a criminal in the new
Let me see - ATM network, chip and pin, credit/debit cards, electron
cards, nectar cards, tesco club cards, . Who needs ID cards since UK
govt now owns the majority share of all UK banks and tesco is set to
buy the rest.
Utopia? - we've been here for a while.
John
news:6l9if5d6ggnk4q3pu...@4ax.com...
> Brian Reay wrote:
>>"Yeti" <ye...@ayrshore.com> wrote in message
>>news:hda5d4$vi8$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> Jimbo GM4DHJ ... wrote:
>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/09/spanish_mobiles/
>>> Why not?
>>Indeed. In fact, why not make it a criminal offence not to register a
>>phone.
>>(Spike, if you invent a dilemma over this, figure it out yourself- your
>>dilemma, your problem.)
> I see you're struggling with the concept of 'dilemma', perhaps that
> explains why you have difficulty recognising one, even when explained
> in simple terms, and why you made the rather revealing remark above.
If I read you correctly, the revelation that you say that Brian has made is
that by not recognising dilemmas that Brian shows himself to have the mind
of a child by always seeing things in black and white?
(Perhaps the reason that Brian is such a Big Prick is that he is being
permanently
pricked by the horns of several simultaneous dilemmas and is in denial about
them?)
Following on from the excellent analysis by Martin Wilson (Thread "I think I
will",
7th Nov at 18:34) what Brian will now do is to divert to his alter-ego which
is
to be as-nice-as-pie for a few days, starting faux on-topic
threads (such as the Clansman one, although in that he has quickly reverted
to
lashing out at all and sundry). Then, because being as-nice-as-pie does not
satisfy
his inner demons, he will revert to type by lashing out at everybody, being
abusive
towards his scapegoat (currently Paul EI7GM) and generally talking down to
everyone in his arrogant pompous manner. I wonder what is his inner demon,
especially the one where he seems to be paranoid about being seen to be
"giving something back"?
Spike, you are one for the war films. I wonder if you are familiar with "The
Enemy Below"
1957, starring Robert Mitchum and Curt Jurgens, where Curt Jurgens plays the
part
of a U-Boat commander who after every skirmish reverts doggedly to his
mission's
compass direction?
How like Brian that such a character is! Driven by an inne demon until
sidetracked
by a skirmish, and then reverting to the behaviour caused by that inner
demon as soon
as it is perceived that the skirmish has ended!
Perhaps the long-term solution to the Brian problem is not to let him think
that
the skirmish has ended, but for all who are so entangled by him, to morph
the
engagement from just a skirmish into a full war?
So, Brian, are you going to seek the pstchiatric help for the problems that
Martin Wilson identified within you?
G1LVN
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/09/spanish_mobiles/
Fact is the bombers were traced prosecuted and locked up by tracing
the mobile phones they used. The trail eventually led back to them.
Back then it was difficult (impossible) to buy a sim card in spain.
They one I used was second hand from a friend who had upgraded their
phone which came with another sim card - That's how they were sold ie
with a phone only. To get a sim card you had to use the second hand
market. The bombers were traced this way i.e. through previous owners.
Contrary to popular belief bomb parts survive quite intact (compared,
say, to flesh and bone).
Recently though operators have started selling paygo sims in spain -
specifically at airports and the preferred (spanish) way to upload
credit is via scratch cards bought at a newsagents - if you pay in
cash the trail runs cold. Spanish public didn't like this (especially
after the bombing).Spanish government following such concerns insisted
they were registered. That's all.
Some clueless journo who doesn't know a thing about spanish cluture
and people turns the story on it's head
Will it happen in the UK? No, the British like their privacy at
whatever cost unlike the Spanish who have a much more open society and
culture. They'll think nothing of calling the rozzers if they don't
know who you are or what you are doing.
luc...@eternal-flames.gov
<ianREMOVET...@g3ohx.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>It will come. One day, to buy anything, you will need an ID card (or
>implanted RFID) with the appropriate level of authorisation.
>Registration of anything which the state requires to be registered will
>be automatic. It will be very difficult to be a criminal in the new
>Utopia.
Nonsense. It will be easier than ever to be a criminal. They won't
bother registering and buying phones, they'll just nick what they
want.
With all of the police, busily chasing the law-abiding, to make sure
they've got the right authorisation to buy whatever. The criminals
won't have to worry about them.
As for this phone registration in Spain.
Buy an illegally cloned local phone, or easier still.
Buy a PAYGO phone, outside of Spain and 'roam' about.
Nick.
Jimbo GM4DHJ ...
<luc...@eternal-flames.gov> wrote in message
news:pieif59u0tdm2m0qm...@4ax.com...
yes ...they are after the wrong people as usual .......
Yeti
Cloning GSM mobiles is not a possibility. Those days disappeared long ago.
On the other hand, the roaming idea will work - although it won't be
cheap :P
luc...@eternal-flames.gov
<jim.g...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>yes ...they are after the wrong people as usual .......
Yes.
Fun at therapy today, Jim?
You need that therapist with the short fair hair and glasses.
She gives good therapy and very reasonably priced.
Jimbo GM4DHJ ...
> Fun at therapy today, Jim?
Yes...very nice... they are now going after the person that caused the
problem in the first place...should save them a lot of referals in the
coming years.......
>
> You need that therapist with the short fair hair and glasses.
> She gives good therapy and very reasonably priced.
extras ?????
luc...@eternal-flames.gov
<jim.g...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Fun at therapy today, Jim?
>
>Yes...very nice... they are now going after the person that caused the
>problem in the first place...should save them a lot of referals in the
>coming years.......
Good. No doubt a 'Bishop' type.
>> You need that therapist with the short fair hair and glasses.
>> She gives good therapy and very reasonably priced.
>
>extras ?????
Oh yes... But good to see someone who takes a deep interest in her
work.
Nick.
luc...@eternal-flames.gov
<jim.g...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Fun at therapy today, Jim?
>
>Yes...very nice... they are now going after the person that caused the
>problem in the first place...should save them a lot of referals in the
>coming years.......
Good. No doubt a 'Bishop' type.
>> You need that therapist with the short fair hair and glasses.
>> She gives good therapy and very reasonably priced.
>
>extras ?????
Oh yes... But good to see someone who takes a deep interest in her
work.
Nick.
Chris
Well since you appear to be following me around now and have a whiff of the
demonic that must mean you are Mandelson.
Jimbo GM4DHJ ...
> Oh yes... But good to see someone who takes a deep interest in her
> work.
>
> Nick.
i do ...
Brian Reay
news:hdc6sh$afa$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>
>
>> Fun at therapy today, Jim?
>
> Yes...very nice... they are now going after the person that caused the
> problem in the first place...should save them a lot of referals in the
> coming years.......
A "therapist" isn't going to be going "after" anyone. Your story makes no
sense. As usual. Like the time you were supposedly beaten up.
Steve Terry
news:183lz6w6e32c2$.1ogucj9i14rf7.dlg@40tude.net...
Steve Terry
--
Get a free Three 3pay Sim with �2 bonus after �10 top up
http://freeagent.three.co.uk/stand/view/id/5276
G1LVN
> "Jimbo GM4DHJ ..." <jim.gm4...@googlemail.com> wrote in messagenews:hdc6sh$afa$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>
>
>
> >> Fun at therapy today, Jim?
>
> > Yes...very nice... they are now going after the person that caused the
> > problem in the first place...should save them a lot of referals in the
> > coming years.......
>
> A "therapist" isn't going to be going "after" anyone. Your story makes no
> sense. As usual. Like the time you were supposedly beaten up.
Makes sense to me. Psychotherapy is about finding the root cause of a
particular anxiety then providing advice and assistance to fix it.
Brian Reay
news:cd43668d-9a09-4160...@a31g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>Makes sense to me. Psychotherapy is about finding the root cause of a
>particular anxiety then providing advice and assistance to fix it.
Then you aren't thinking.
Any "therapist" who hears a tale of woe from a patient is not in a position
to say "You problem is down to Mr(s) Bloggs, I will go after them." On the
other hand, if the patient just can't hack the reality of the real world,
the therapist may well try to help the patient to deal with the things most
people deal with. Not quite the same thing.
Then again, you claim knowledge of therapists, may be they do make promises
they can't keep.
luc...@eternal-flames.gov
Surely you're not surprised? I said three weeks ago I would treat all
of your postings with interest.
That's all I'm doing... Giving you the treatment.
Old Nick.
Jimbo GM4DHJ ...
whoever deals with the outcomes of these things know I have been helped and
suggesting that a certain person would benefit from some "help" thus
avoiding the future referrals of others he is damaging? ...........and brian
try not to embellish this in the way you added "beaten up by my fellow
amateurs" which I never said..............P.S. have you watched your
MM3/2M0 pal on that pirate radio youtube clip yet? .....
Brian Reay
>> A "therapist" isn't going to be going "after" anyone. Your story makes
no
>> sense. As usual. Like the time you were supposedly beaten up.
>>
>>
> OK "going after" perhaps wasn't the right expression...how about letting
> whoever deals with the outcomes of these things know I have been helped
> and suggesting that a certain person would benefit from some "help" thus
> avoiding the future referrals of others he is damaging?
So now this "therapist" is doing "remote" diagnosis on the basis of
second-hand information from someone under therapy.
This third person will have a legal field day.
Jimbo GM4DHJ ...
"Brian Reay" <s...@website.invalid> wrote in message
news:hUBKm.8344$FM5....@newsfe05.ams2...
I'm only telling you what they are going to do......I don't give a toss what
you think.......
Chris
Treatment for what? And what makes you think I need any?
luc...@eternal-flames.gov
<ng...@chris-street.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>> Surely you're not surprised? I said three weeks ago I would treat all
>> of your postings with interest.
>>
>> That's all I'm doing... Giving you the treatment.
>>
>> Old Nick.
>
>Treatment for what? And what makes you think I need any?
You're new here... It isn't a question of whether you need it. :-)
Nick.
luc...@eternal-flames.gov
p.s. Just out of interest, what part of Yorkshire are you?
Chris
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:29:11 +0000, luc...@eternal-flames.gov wrote:
>
> p.s. Just out of interest, what part of Yorkshire are you?
Like you really think I'm going to tell someone as clearly unstable as you
are info like that?
luc...@eternal-flames.gov
Are you that ashamed of Sheffield?
Nick.
Chris
If you had said Bradford it would have been better. I'm not from either
fortunately.
luc...@eternal-flames.gov
<ng...@chris-street.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>If you had said Bradford it would have been better. I'm not from either
>fortunately.
Oh well... Perhaps there is some hope for you. :-)
Nick.