BNP are faking their letters...
Moral Conscience
on their site and as opposition have a poorly written letter....
For an analysis of the fake read below!
Chris X wrote:
> "Moral Conscience" <an...@123.com> wrote in message
news:p8w7e.29697$pA6....@newsfe1-win.ntli.net...
>
>>
>> leighton Jones wrote:
>>
>>
>>> "Chris X" <Chr...@postmaster.co.uk> wrote in message
news:ls2dnaNGWNe...@giganews.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>> "leighton Jones" <leigh...@virgin.net> wrote in message
news:8Jv7e.29676$pA6....@newsfe1-win.ntli.net...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> "Chris X" <Chr...@postmaster.co.uk> wrote in message
news:-6ednUqREM9...@giganews.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.bnp.org.uk/democracy/lettersmain.php
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you say u want free speach but you will not show any of the
emails sent that are against your policies, if u didnt im sure uv have
many more emails to show. ur policies are aload of **** n how are you
the biggest growing party? half of the NHS is run by asians not because
they are asian its because they are skilled enough to do the job so they
deserve the placement. plz email back i would like tohear what you would
have to say back if you have an oppinion about my email because we all
no u love **** freedom of speech.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Courtney Grant, Halesowen College
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Editors response...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh dear, where do I begin?
>>>>>> The BNP does indeed champion freedom of speech, but for
decency's sake > I had to remove your expletives.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Would it be cynical of me to suggest that young Courtney, doesn't
exist!
>>>>> Yesterday we had School boy; Adam, who though he had good points
to make, had the same English written skills as Courtney?
>>>>>
>>>>> Does the BNP get no e-mails that criticise, and are written
correctly?
>>>>> Yesterday the "editor" slated the English skills but left in the
good points that had been made!
>>>>> Today the "complaint", actually seems to back up BNP claims, in a
round about way!
>>>>>
>>>>> Could it be that when letters are a little slow coming in, then a
bit of artistic licence is used, in an attempt to push the views of the BNP.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Poor Jones, and your display of support the other day for your
young schoolboy namesake was *so* touching ...
>>>> Now he's not so sure that poor Adam even *exists*. Deary me
Jones, ye of little faith .....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ah, but Chris, Did I ever believe that Young Adam Existed?
>>> Or was he just perfect to make a point with, about BNP policy?
>>> And you provided the link!
>>> Perfect!
>>> Cheers LJ.
>>
>>
>> The BNP have probably posted a fake. Using standard analytical
techniques the above is a fake. To give a few examples:
>>
>> 1. The first part of the first sentence is reasonably well written
except for the use of 'u'. The grammar is good - an indication of it
being someone who is an adult. Yet, with a proven ability the poster
then makes some silly "mistakes" for the rest of the post - deliberate.
>
>
>
>> 2. A 'u' used in the beginning to act like a child however, a few
words later it is 'you' and for the rest of the post it is 'u' again -
any kid that uses txt messages sticks with 'u' so, the conclusion is
that the poster was an adult that slipped up.
>
>
>
> It could just as well be a kid who was trying to write like an adult
and then thought "sod it".
Not at all. The 'u' comes first, an indication of an attempt to be a
child. The 'you' is the slip up.
>
>
>> 3. The content considered issues that a kid would not have know about.
>
>
>
> What issues wouldn't a kid have KNOWN about ?
You know how you are trying to spin matters - a kid would not know about
the core issues of your spin. It requires psychological analysis....
>
>
>> There were too many relevant political and spin related matters for
it to be from a person who has not spent a long time analyzing them...
>
>
>
> Absolute rubbish from our resident alien who is now making it up as
he goes along even *more* than before !
Keep denying it... you know you are trying to fake it - "letters" to the
BNP is a good way to do it as well as it having an ability to influence
your supporters - another mindbender technique. You are using a
technique of portraying the oppositions points from a "dumb" perspective
to convince your supporters of your superiority.
